Re: [OSM-talk] Big Blue Button download

Hello Rory, Can you please see if the video for Aug 8, 2020- 9-10 pm IST is there ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Virtual_Mappy_Hours We will move the videos to our youtube channel . thanks, naveenpf On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 a

[OSM-talk] India:Kerala: State to launch crowd-sourced mapping project

Hello, Kerala Govt has started mapping project in OpenStreetMap OSM Kerala community had a technical consultation earlier in March 2019[1] Our CM has urged everyone to map in OpenStreetMap. He had a video conference with NSS volunteers as a part of the inauguration [2] News from national daily[3

Re: [OSM-talk] Facebook mapping highways using AI in collaboration with OpenStreetMap

Hello Nuno I get your point Try YOGA it will help you. thanks, naveenpf On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:18 PM Nuno Caldeira wrote: > > Às 11:02 de 29/07/2019, Naveen Francis escreveu: > > > > On the rhetoric question:- > > We are using OSM maps life savings projects. >

Re: [OSM-talk] Facebook mapping highways using AI in collaboration with OpenStreetMap

ys All the best for fixing Tiger imports. thanks, naveenpf On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 4:15 PM Simon Poole wrote: > > Am 26.07.2019 um 19:30 schrieb Naveen Francis: > > Including my ₹ 0.10 (Indian ten paisa) > > Echoes same thoughts of Brazilian Real. > > AI-assisted human

Re: [OSM-talk] Facebook mapping highways using AI in collaboration with OpenStreetMap

Including my ₹ 0.10 (Indian ten paisa) Echoes same thoughts of Brazilian Real. AI-assisted human mapping tools will be a good aid for the OSM community. "Map faster, Map better". 40,00,000 kms to be mapped in India. 15 years of OSM mapped 18,00,000 kms. thanks, naveenpf On Fri, Jul 26, 2019

[OSM-talk] Metrics @ Improveosm is down

Hello, Metrics @ Improveosm is down https://metrics.improveosm.org/ thanks, naveenpf ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Language used in OSM forum/wiki/mailing list

)#Moving_from_draft_to_reality Thanks, Naveen Francis <http://wikibooks.in> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 4:18 PM Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 5:40 PM Naveen Francis > wrote: > >> Is there any policy on the language used in OSM talk/forum/wiki ? >> I was going through T

Re: [OSM-talk] Language used in OSM forum/wiki/mailing list

, raise in the forum. Second, raise to Moderator. Moderator can take the call ? When Verdy was blocked in the Wiki , we didn't had any policy. (still, we don't have) It was discussed on the random talk page. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Lyx#Verdy_p_2 Thanks, Naveen Fra

[OSM-talk] Language used in OSM forum/wiki/mailing list

ded or terminated depending on the degree of the abuse. Thanks, Naveen Francis <http://wikibooks.in> ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Grab using OSM Data for route preview

Some discussion are happening in OSM Asia telegram group @OpenStreetMapAsia On Thu 20 Dec, 2018, 8:11 PM Imre Samu > Techcrunch: "Grab is messing up the world’s largest mapping community’s > data in Southeast Asia > Remote teams incorrectly overwrote data developed by volunteer mappers in > T

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikimedia Community Wishlist 2019

Hello Stefano, Can you remove T156682 and add T158919 ? Enable auto-positioned snapshot on Kartographer side https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist_Survey_2019/Miscellaneous/Wikimedia_Maps_Improvements The above proposal has been redrafted to have only two important tasks. Main wishes

Re: [OSM-talk] United Nations World Geospatial Information Congres (UN-GGIM)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjMNeU3ewM0 On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 2:06 PM Naveen Francis wrote: > Hello, > > Any participation from openstreetmap community ? > UNWGIC in China to explore Geospatial for a better world > https://youtu.be/DjMNeU3ewM > > Thanks, > naveenp

[OSM-talk] United Nations World Geospatial Information Congres (UN-GGIM)

Hello, Any participation from openstreetmap community ? UNWGIC in China to explore Geospatial for a better world https://youtu.be/DjMNeU3ewM Thanks, naveenpf ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.

Re: [OSRM-talk] OSRM-talk Digest, Vol 27, Issue 12

Hi Romain, I would also be pretty interested in a bicriteria (or multicriteria) OSRM version. What bicriteria algorithm would you like to use? Let me first introduce myself. I'm involved in a SmartCities European Project in my city and we would like to provide routes that consider the minimization

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap

nded to be a contract, so there's no contractual relationship between A and B, though its easy enough for one to be implied in some jurisdictions. -- Francis Davey ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap

under CC-BY-SA. The second paragraph does that job well as far as I can see and prevents OSM from relicensing nearmap data under ODbL. All this is, of course, on the assumption that any intellectual property rights require licensing. -- Francis Davey __

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs are not full copyright assignment

;t thought about at all for anywhere other than the UK, where its sufficiently complicated to use up my time so far. You may well be right elsewhere in the world. Something for me to think about. -- Francis Davey ___ legal-talk mailing li

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs are not full copyright assignment

England, but not punitive damages. Some civil law jurisdictions won't allow punitive damages even for breach of copyright. How *effective* ODbL (or CC for that matter) might be is a separate and equally vexed question to the question of what is caught. -- Francis Davey

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?

On 19 April 2011 13:46, Anthony wrote: > > > My jurisdiction is Florida. OK. Mine is England and Wales. Licenses operate on different principles here as they do with you, so we can leave it there. -- Francis Davey ___ legal-talk mailing lis

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?

On 18 April 2011 15:09, 80n <80n...@gmail.com> wrote: > Francis > Thank you for your patience and the detail of your answers. > > This whole thing is a complicated business and the subtleties when > various different licenses and so forth are combine are often > unexp

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4

On 24 March 2011 09:29, Francis Davey wrote: > > > In context (which is how all contracts are read) it clearly means that > the purpose of the contract is to ensure that the contribution of data > does not infringe and to that end the contributor gives a warranty as > to their

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Objects versions ready for ODbL

ut the CTs also include a grant to sue for infringement. A non-exclusive licensee may, in some circumstances, be able to sue for copyright infringement. -- Francis Davey ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetm

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

x27;t wait to see the dispute over the "hanging chads" in > that scenario. I'm not sure why its humerous. There seems (to me) to be nothing wrong in principle in holding a vote by email or indeed by any other electronic means. There are of course problems, but then so are there with

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Database and its contents

one of a list of things (copying etc) whereas you infringe database right by extraction or reutlisation (of a substantial part...). -- Francis Davey ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Would The ODbL and BY-SA Clash In A Database Extracted From a BY-SA Produced Work?

1997 works in a similar way. It states: "16. — (1) Subject to the provisions of this Part, a person infringes database right in a database if, without the consent of the owner of the right, he extracts or re-utilises all or a substantial part of the contents of the database." Where &

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] ODbL vs CC-by-SA pros and cons

On 1 September 2010 14:42, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Francis Davey schrieb: >> >> Agreeing with the person you assign to that they will only use the >> copyright in certain ways won't protect you against a subsequent >> assignee of the copyright (eg OSMF assigns to

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Community vs. Licensing

a pure niggle of style. -- Francis Davey ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Contributor Terms - The Early Years

d be resolved against them and in favour of a contributor. This is what (I think) is meant by another poster to this thread talking about a "contract of adhesion" - though in English law that sort of doctrine relates particularly to unfair terms and consumers rather than as a generality. -- Francis Davey ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] decision removing data

t of MPs then such a claim might well fail (since it has that list anyway) whereas a carefully checked list generated by someone else (eg by My Society) might be different. The "Fixtures Marketing" cases being particularly relevant: http://www.out-law.com/page-5055 -- Francis Davey ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] decision removing data

On 5 August 2010 22:26, 80n <80n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Francis > Indeed.  Let's start getting specific.  The threshold in the US is very low > - which incidentally is where this "you can't copyright facts" stuff > originated. I may have missed that par

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Contributor Terms

ave > explicit > permission from the rights holder to submit the content. > Why not something like "You agree only to add contents which may be lawfully distributed under [ ] licence" or something like that. -- Francis Davey _