r GPS, and so be less
precise when being in a forest?
--
hartmut
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 03.07.23 18:03, Marc_marc wrote:
but any reference about "google using ODBl" ?
via their Niantec subsidiary for Pocemon Go?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 2020-08-31 15:48, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Here’s an article about the players of the new flightsimulator improving
> buildings:
>
> https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2020/08/28/players-are-fixing-microsoft-flight-simulators-missing-monuments-with-google-maps/
>
> is there a way to import t
...
--
hartmut
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
st basic GIS applications)
--
hartmut
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ansmission error
at the town hall, nobody would even have known about ASCII
back in those days ...)
--
hartmut
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 2020-05-26 15:53, Dave F via talk wrote:
>
>
> On 26/05/2020 09:19, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
>>
>> sorry, my fault, it is bicycle_road=yes in addition to highway=*
>> (usually residential)
>>
>> and it isn't a cycleway as it is a regular road that
On 2020-05-26 10:00, Marc M. wrote:
>> I'm missing highway=bicycle_road being rendered
>
> only one https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=bicycle_road :)
> why it isn't a highway=cycleway ?
sorry, my fault, it is bicycle_road=yes in addition to highway=*
(usually residential)
and it isn
p is not desirable.
looking at my area I'm missing highway=bicycle_road being rendered
(and maybe bicycle parking facilities, too)
And in rather unrelated news I'm wondering whether you generated that
nice map legend sidebar with some automated too
On 19.03.20 20:02, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
> But (at least to me) "dissemination of authoritative data sets" sounds like
> "overwriting OSM data with external dataset" or "importing just because
> it is official".
>
> Just yesterday I was explaining to one of mappers that it is OK to ma
ould end up in which table,
planet_osm_line vs. planet_osm_polygon?
In that case it would probably not matter at all ...?
--
hartmut
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 25.02.20 18:03, Tomek wrote:
W dniu 20-02-25 o 16:26, Hartmut Holzgraefe pisze:
In a former company I worked for we had a clear "The burden shall
be on the writer, not the readers" principle. As the number of
readers is usually much larger then the number of writers (typically
to language choice and translations alone).
I would say this principle should apply here, too.
PS: While I like the general idea of choosing a common language
like Esperanto, I know that it will fail the same way as "we
should all use an open source word processor". People will stil
uld
qualify as unacceptable militant / extremist IMHO, but as far
as I can tell they are actually a very vocal, but nonetheless
rather small fraction of all the different groups collecting
themselves under the "Antifa" label.
--
hartmut
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
its of nanodegrees.
optional int64 lat_offset = 19 [default=0];
optional int64 lon_offset = 20 [default=0];
So we are at 64bit precision in nanodegrees, which brings us into
the range of possibly being as precise as low as a few percent
of a micrometer ...
That should be good enough f
On 08.02.20 11:58, Rory McCann wrote:
On 07.02.20 20:12, stevea wrote:
A well-known example is (national, other) boundaries, which
frequently do not exist "on the ground,"
National borders don't exist on the ground? huh? Have you ever actually
_crossed_ an international border? I assure you the
On 07.02.20 20:56, Colin Smale wrote:
In the case of Crimea, two different authorities have different views of
the jurisdiction to which it belongs. That is a fact, that we can safely
map. We can represent the border in one place "according to Russia" and
in another place "according to Ukraine
On 27.01.20 16:57, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
I also added them to the userboxes reference page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wiki_userboxes#Contact_.26_OSM_identity
along with the already existing SVN User box that was not listed there
yet ...
and now I see that I actually created
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wiki_userboxes#Contact_.26_OSM_identity
along with the already existing SVN User box that was not listed there
yet ...
--
hartmut
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
the very end to create the actual
PDF
also you'll still see presentation slides created with LaTeX Beamer
quite often, at least on open source events ...
--
hartmut
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
emoved, so it
is not easy to tell what UTF-8 sequence it actually doesn't like.
I did a quick check by downloading the last few hours of minutely
diffs, and then running all of them through xmllint, but that
didn't complain about any of them ...
--
hartmut
___
On 04.02.19 11:10, Maarten Deen wrote:
> The changes still don't show up. Also in another area [1] I've made
> changes (Kirchstraße is not pedestrian and added to memorials) that
> don't show up.
> Also someone on the dutch mailing list complained about changes not
> showing up.
> Is the renderer
to 1:12 I'd say it is showing this
neighborhood on Sylt:
https://binged.it/2KFpItb
Doesn't necessarily say that the house really is in that neighborhood,
but you get an idea how low-contrast reed thatching can bee in arial images
--
hartmut
__
23 matches
Mail list logo
