The time-to-destination shown on the public OSRM router seems to be
much too short.
e.g. For the route from Sheffield to Nottingham, via Chesterfield
(UK), OSRM says it will take 42 minutes. That is not a realistic time
at all. Even if you drive as fast as possible (breaking the speed
). This method would
be liveable with if it didn't zoom out so much.
Is there any easier way to do this that I haven't noticed?
Thanks,
Spod
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Ah, I hadn't seen that before - Thanks Richard!
As you say, it's not quite what I was looking for, because Nominatim's
nearest place to the coordinates can be a long way off the entered
coordinates. If it handled coordinates directly, then that would be exactly
what I need. I'll add something to
I have the VisionTac VGPS-900 (which is the same as the Columbus V900), and
am very happy with it.
1) For me, the audio recording is a vital feature, especially when mapping
house numbers, shops, POIs, turn restrictions etc. Having used this a lot, I
can't see myself going back to a logger
http://www.japantoday.com/category/lifestyle/view/crowds-create-wikipedia-style-maps-of-the-world?utm_campaign=jt_newsletterutm_medium=emailutm_source=jt_newsletter_2012-03-22_AM
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
OK, so spelling corrections could be viewed as not removing the taint,
because we can't tell if the agreer making the change used a
odbl/CT-compatible source for the change or not.
Thinking about it, other edits done by bots to normalise the tagging into
a standard (e.g. changing something like
6 matches
Mail list logo