preference).
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
terms cannot accept any data with an attribution condition.
Hopefully that is not the case! Is that interpretation any way valid,
interesting, cross eyed? If the answer is already out there, just link
to it. Thanks!
TimSC
___
legal-talk
tmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2010-April/005707.html
) This really only becomes an issue if/when ODbL relicensing kicks in,
as I understand.
This issue also applies to OS opendata, as it requires attribution. Is
work afoot to get OS to agree to compatibility with ODbL? (Probably in
the LWG?)
Ti
shows how much most
companies know. I don't see BSD as much more or less fragmented than
linux (given the whole Google/Android kernel branch being left to rot.)
Also, if we really cared about share-alike, we would have it apply to
"produced works" - that would encourage c
On 18/07/10 19:39, John Smith wrote:
On 19 July 2010 04:30, TimSC wrote:
Also, if we really cared about share-alike, we would have it apply to
"produced works" - that would encourage companies to give back.
Judging by a same straw poll, very few people cared about SA ex
On 18/07/10 21:22, John Smith wrote:
On 19 July 2010 06:18, TimSC wrote:
On 18/07/10 19:39, John Smith wrote:
On 19 July 2010 04:30, TimSC wrote:
Also, if we really cared about share-alike, we would have it apply to
"produced works" - that would encourage co
rmer considered "who should rule?", the later considers "how do we
tame the rulers?".
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
lly sound if I download my own contribution due,
to database rights? Would this interfere with relicensing of the data?
TimSC
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
nk anyone
should be surprised that relicensing is so divisive. I think the
consensus for licensing has not been properly quantified (and if I am
wrong, please get on with relicensing). And a consensus should not be
used to silence dissent. That would be tyranny of t
ough you can even be right) as you are
draining the community.
What are you talking about? The guidelines SteveC proposed are to
moderate how the discussion should be conducted, not how the project is
defined!
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@op
, that this whole proposal
is mainly motivated by the desire to censor dissent.
TimSC
On 10/08/10 21:29, steve brown wrote:
If you do suggest changes, just go ahead and make them on the page
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
sue on the legal-talk mailing list. No answer yet.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-August/003968.html
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
procedure. Perhaps the title "OSM discussion moderator"
might be more appropriate, and enables SteveC to pass it along if necessary.
TimSC
[1] http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Main_Page
[2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSFDm3UYkeE
[3]
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Questions_to_LW
re. It might do more harm than
good, depending on the outcome.
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
d in other people's views.
Regards,
TimSC
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On 18/08/10 15:13, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:51 PM, TimSC
wrote:
Is tracing someones ODbL licensed GPS track a creation of a derived database
or a produced work?
Depends how you store the trace, doesn't it?
How specifically does the interpretation of the ODbL d
case
quite well:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/File:License_Proposal.pdf
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ning a data set for which the original surveyor is
no longer participating. The alternative is to resurvey the whole planet
every decade from scratch.
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forking
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 06/10/10 00:59, Richard Weait wrote:
http://opengeodata.org/osm-founder-steve-coast-leaves-cloudmade
What, if any, impact does this have on OSM and OSMF, I wonder?
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
mailing list? So the question is: how
should the various organs of OSM interact to best achieve the overall
goal of OSM?
Answers on a post card :)
Regards,
TimSC
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Board_Meeting_June_2011
[2] https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_119fr26kqdz
*
k you are confusing "support the relicense" with "accept the
relicense" and that difference is significant.
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 10/06/11 22:51, Dermot McNally wrote:
On 10 June 2011 22:16, TimSC wrote:
I think you are confusing "support the relicense" with "accept the
relicense" and that difference is significant.
Not at all - I know of no form of democracy that distinguishes between
gr
ut no "signal", as engineers would call it.
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
n the OSMF as a member (people keep suggesting this but I don't
actually agree!)
Regards,
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ism in the CTs is different from
what previously had happened. But really the past doesn't matter as much
as what we do next.
Regards,
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
parties and Richard: please respond with a
definition of what constitutes "news" and/or some reasoning that it is
"one person's hobbyhorse", otherwise I will revert you back. Also if you
want to raise awareness of the poll, I would appreciate some support
here! ;)
Reg
ed your request - live and let live. I
am not asking you to do much - I am just asking for you to lay off, please.
So now I hope we can agree that other people think the poll is news, and
that it is consistent with past news items, are there any other
_constructive_ comments regarding putting the p
x27;t recommend SA licensed tiles for that. This forces me into
OS's arms with their BY type OpenData. I would prefer to use a crowd
sourced map that is not SA for tiles. (Unless I can trace over OSM tiles
without violating the current tile license, which I don't think is
possible.)
eves it should
be done differently. Credo experto - believe me, i've tried.
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ost normal legal professionals can't understand, unless
they are specialists). I suggest as many tasks as possible be moved into
domains were people actually have the skills to help out. (This might be
a lame idea but at least I am trying to
a high standard of behavior set by the community leaders. (Yes,
admittedly moderation takes volunteers but we need to agree on a plan
before implementing it.) Can anyone think of a better plan?
Regards,
TimSC
PS I plan to disregard, as much as I can, all non-constructive input. I
will
On 20/06/11 18:35, Dair Grant wrote:
TimSC wrote:
I suggest as many tasks as possible be moved into domains were people actually
have the skills to help out.
Then I suggest you do it, rather than just suggest it.
Doing things without discussing it might result in bad things
On 6/20/2011 8:03 AM, TimSC wrote:
It would be nice if the committee would be aware of this long standing
problems and as[k] for help from the community too. We have
considerable human resources in the community and if people are over
worked, perhaps they should delegate more?
Also, it can
34 matches
Mail list logo
