For those who are still naive to think that journalists find out these
things themselves: Google has huge amount of money to waste on PR. If last
two years is evidence everyone is happy to advertise "new stuff" of their
maps, because it's very easy for people to relate to.
I don't see how OSM woul
2013/5/24 Martin Koppenhoefer
>
>
> interesting, but it's a pity that really a lot of them seem to be "mapped"
> by import rather than OSM mappers.
>
>
It is bad because?
Peter.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetma
As one of people who raised issue of iD being slow on Firefox more than
week ago, I must say that I tested it right now on Firefox 20 (on same
system, just Firefox upgrade) and it is much much faster. Thanks for
improvements to iD dev team and keep up good work! :)
Respectfully,
Peteris Krisjanis.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Haiti/Imagery_and_data_sources#Google_Imagery
This is one explanation. Also source=Google really says nothing that source
is Google Maps.
P.
2013/5/18 malenki
> There are abot 33.000 objects in OSM which have "google" in the one
> way or another
Hi!
I write a work for which I did a small comparison of walking/transit
routing/data between digital maps for my diploma work. One thing caught my
eye is that while MapQuest have this nice open.mapquest.com site with all
up-to-date and nicely legit attribution to us, their default site for
capita
Hi Mike!
I'm not the person who can fix this, but can you be more precise why
do you think this is error from rectration bot? Do you claim that
license of data were ok? Please specify.
Respectfully,
Peteris.
2012/8/22 Mike Dupont :
> i am not going to deal with this ignorance,
> thanks
> mike
>
I think most humanly possible way is to set up monitoring for concrete
region and follow changesets. Usually those with vandalism don't have
very insightful changeset comments, also user names can sometimes
indicate intent.
I think there is no way computer can detect this except using our
defined
Actually I fail to see any war going on, because Google can easily
take our data, attribute accordingly and use them (with ODbL it will
be even easier). For some unknown for me reason they still insist to
use their own "soup" of data :)
So Microsoft gave us Bing permission, and for that I say than
2012. gada 1. aprīlis 13:01 Павел Фомин rakstīja:
> 01.04.2012, 12:16, "Mike Dupont" :
>
> I think we agreed here on the "on the ground rule", kosovo is on the ground
> the republic of kosovo and not serbia.
> [...]
> belgrad is not in fact control of kosovo, kosovo is its own country.
>
>
> Arrrg
2012. gada 29. janvāris 17:05 Morten Kjeldgaard rakstīja:
> Hi,
>
> It appears the danish meteorological institute has pointed to an area near
> Halmstad/Markaryd as an example where OpenstreetMap is poorer that Google
> maps [1].
Have some web source with such claims? Just interested.
There's n
2011. gada 15. decembris 17:42 Ed Avis rakstīja:
> If the new CC licence will be ready next year, why not keep the existing CC
> licence available as an option until then, in parallel with the ODbL? Then
> when
> CC4 is finalized the OSMF can make the decision whether to drop CC altogether.
> Bu
2011/10/10 Parveen Arora :
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:53 AM, pec...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Next time just Google For It [tm] :)
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Android
>
> Thank You very much :)
> and can you please suggest If any application is best according to
2011/10/10 Parveen Arora :
> Hi All,
> I was searching for the applications for android using OSM data and
> have got few.
> So Please suggest me some good applications like offline and online
> maps, navigation etc. etc. of android which uses OSM data.
Next time just Google For It [tm] :)
http:/
2011/10/5 Ed Loach :
> Lambert wrote:
>
>> Personally I would say: '.. OFFICIALLY used locally.'
>
> Which is where it becomes political... Do you mean officially
> according to Israel? Or official according to international
> resolutions such as
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Gener
2011/5/6 Josh Doe :
> Has anyone discussed the creation of a comprehensiveness or level of
> detail rating? What I mean by this is different from a quality rating
> or metric, as that is a very difficult task which entails comparison
> against "authoritative" sources or some other process, and diff
2011/5/5 Russ Nelson :
> Dermot McNally writes:
> > The change in licence and CTs has been endorsed massively by The
> > Community.
>
> I'm wondering on what data you come to that conclusion? Because people
> have clicked "ok" on the license change and CTs? And yet there is no
> agreement and no
If you wanna critize SWG/OSMF *again*, please, create new thread but
don't spam this one. I know there is lot of desire to express pain how
communication doesn't work between some very loud minority and OSMF,
but please, do it properly.
About logo - new version looks excellent in high resolution,
2011/4/18 Elizabeth Dodd :
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:40:45 +0200
> Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
>
>> In all the countries I know of ticking a checkbox is comparable to
>> sign a printed contract, so I thin is pointless to have a written
>> contract or a Copy&Past thing ;)
>
> add Australia to you
2011/4/11 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer :
> 2011/4/11 Dermot McNally :
>> OSM is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If
>> OSM is to survive at all it will be among bearded hippies too behind
>> the times to have discovered Waze. OSM continues to decay. Nothing
>> short of a cockeyed
2011/2/11 Andrew Ayre :
> What is the point of spreading unfounded FUD? OSM doesn't need Microsoft to
> exist anyway.
Well, I'm not talking about OSM existence, of course. I'm talking
about interesting collaboration between Microsoft and OSM community
which just started to give fruits. It was just
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12427680
I think we can call it a day. I really doubt Microsoft will be that
interested in OSM anymore when they got Nokia on their hook.
Cheers,
Peter.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openst
2010/12/6 Serge Wroclawski :
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:42 AM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
>> On 6 December 2010 14:55, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
Hi,
So, this is awkward. According to my profile, I've "agreed to the
new Contri
22 matches
Mail list logo
