On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> In my opinion, changeset-based sources also make it clear which edit was
> using which source. For example, since good Bing imagery has become
> available, I've developed a habit to trace the buildings in an area from
> Bing, then go out and
Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:00 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> You can also put this information in the change-set-comment. IMHO this
>> is where this belongs to. AFAIK the source-tag is disputed and it is
>> recommended to use the changeset comments.
>
> Source is disput
2011/6/17 Steve Bennett :
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:00 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> Source is disputed? By whom? I've never heard any dispute about it? I
> put a source tag on every single object I create, and try and update
> it when I modify it.
It is not completely useless but I observed that
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:00 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> You can also put this information in the change-set-comment. IMHO this
> is where this belongs to. AFAIK the source-tag is disputed and it is
> recommended to use the changeset comments.
Source is disputed? By whom? I've never heard an
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason gmail.com> writes:
>I've been away for a while. But it seems to me from reading the terms
>that I can't say yes to them in good faith, not because I don't want
>to, but because I remember I derived a few things from external
>CC-BY-SA, and I can't now recall what they were
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:50 PM, SomeoneElse
wrote:
> On 16/06/2011 18:00, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> You can also put this information in the change-set-comment. IMHO this
>> is where this belongs to. AFAIK the source-tag is disputed and it is
>> recommended to use the changeset comments.
On 16/06/2011 18:00, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
You can also put this information in the change-set-comment. IMHO this
is where this belongs to. AFAIK the source-tag is disputed and it is
recommended to use the changeset comments.
The problem with the changeset "source" tag is that there's no
2011/6/16 Toby Murray :
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Graham Stewart (GrahamS)
> wrote:
>>
>> and that the source tag is certainly recommended, but not enforced.
>
> There is no such thing as an "enforced tag" in OSM. If you choose not
> to use a tag then that is your choice. Not using a sour
Toby Murray-2 wrote:
>
> There is no such thing as an "enforced tag" in OSM. If you choose not
> to use a tag then that is your choice.
>
"Enforced" may have been a poor choice of word.
What I meant was that, as I understand it, there is no particular licensing
requirement that every node/way
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Graham Stewart (GrahamS)
wrote:
>
> and that the source tag is certainly recommended, but not enforced.
There is no such thing as an "enforced tag" in OSM. If you choose not
to use a tag then that is your choice. Not using a source tag when
basing your mapping on
have contributed has source=OS OpenData or
some such. I really don't care that much even if that is deleted.
Nick
-Toby Murray wrote: -
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
From: Toby Murray
Date: 16/06/2011 02:07AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Can I say "yes" to the ODbL if I can't acc
Steve Bennett-3 wrote:
>
> ..the -BY- part means you
> have to attribute the source. So presumably you weren't in compliance
> with their licence anyway...
>
My understanding is that attribution is covered by the public attributions
on this Wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contri
Steve Bennett-3 wrote:
>
> Hi Aevar,
> Out of curiosity, how do you derive stuff from a CC-BY-SA source
> without making a note of the source? I mean, the -BY- part means you
> have to attribute the source. So presumably you weren't in compliance
> with their licence anyway...
>
Here's one pos
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> I've been away for a while. But it seems to me from reading the terms
> that I can't say yes to them in good faith, not because I don't want
> to, but because I remember I derived a few things from external
> CC-BY-SA, and I can't n
If only there were a way to indicate the *source* of a given object...
This is obviously hindsight and doesn't help at this point in your
situation but seriously... The source=* tag: use it.
Toby
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:48 PM, john whelan wrote:
> Exactly my own situation, except following p
Exactly my own situation, except following poor advice I accepted the new
CT. Apparently it is not possible to change the CT status and my formal
request to have my suspect data deleted seems to have been ignored.
My recommendation is not to accept the CT, and reenter those items that you
did fro
- Original Message -
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason"
To: "OpenStreetMap blather"
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:06 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Can I say "yes" to the ODbL if I can't account for
100%of my data?
Back in 2006 I wrote the following
Back in 2006 I wrote the following when it still wasn't clear what the
ODbL acceptance terms would be like:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 22:10, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> If someone presents me with a boolean "Do you allow relicensing under
> the ODbL" I'll have to say no because some of my edits
18 matches
Mail list logo
