Well, when I did my "original" edit in that area because of the collapse,
somebody had already deleted the small section that collapsed. So, I just
added the missing "access=no" tags on the other ways.
Plus, it didn't hurt that I was on my PC already and watching the local 11PM
(EDT) news and
Let's forget about Google Maps for a moment that give thanks to the
contributors who updated I-5 on OpenStreetMap. Alan, rickmastfan67,
Sundance and katpatuka have all contributed to the update.
It is dedicated mappers like these that make OSM great.
--
Clifford
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a huma
On 26/mag/2013, at 13:03, Paweł Paprota wrote:
> Well of course when you put "osm" in the search query you will get results
> from OSM.org... but it kind of defeats the purpose - the point is to promote
> OSM to people who don't know about it, isn't it?
you only get these results because
Well of course when you put "osm" in the search query you will get
results from OSM.org... but it kind of defeats the purpose - the point
is to promote OSM to people who don't know about it, isn't it?
On 05/26/2013 12:23 AM, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote:
Am 25/mag/2013 um 12:22 schrieb Paweł Pap
Am 25/mag/2013 um 12:22 schrieb Paweł Paprota :
> Sure but have you ever seen a link to OSM object (way/relation/node) in the
> internet?
Yes, I noted this because of a misspelled street name, but it also works for
correctly spelled ones, if you put osm to the search term you'll see them
so
Paweł Paprota writes:
> Sure but have you ever seen a link to OSM object (way/relation/node) in
> the internet?
Sure. I link to them all the time (warning, these are all associated
with railroads, so if you're not a railfan, click at your peril!):
This search:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/s/ope
On 05/25/2013 12:15 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Of course with Wikipedia it was somehow "easier" because all of their
work gets indexed by search engines
Also osm is indexed by search engines
Sure but have you ever seen a link to OSM object (way/relation/node) in
the internet?
When
On 25/mag/2013, at 10:33, Paweł Paprota wrote:
> Of course with Wikipedia it was somehow "easier" because all of their
> work gets indexed by search engines
Also osm is indexed by search engines
cheers
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreet
Things like these and in general -mania really only show how upside down the world is
nowadays.
Does OSM really want press like that? I'm not sure... true, it would
"get the word out" about OSM but is that the "proper" way to publicize?
I think people don't really care that some bridge was removed
For the press it's simple: everybody knows Google, Google is 'hot'.
Openstreetmap is relatively unknown. So writing about Openstreetmap won't
attract a lot of viewers for an article. And I wonder whether the community
really wants to see Openstreetmap turn into a big player which attracts a
lot of
How can we get more effective press coverage from events? Part of it is
probably more people volunteering for the communications working group, but
is there more?
Note: If you want to help with the CWG, email
communicat...@osmfoundation.org.
From: James Mast [mailto:rickmastfa...@hotmail.co
11 matches
Mail list logo
