Did you read all I wrote? What do you think I mean with If we want to
specify the type you are of course welcome to do that, e.g.
bridge=viaduct or electrified=contact_line and These are only
examples where yes|no could be used. Other descriptive values are
still valid, e.g. bridge=viaduct or
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
regards
Konrad
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
How precisely is that going to end the debate?
a) Voting isn't the way to do this. It either needs consensus or a
dictator.
b) Lots of people don't care
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
Oh, and this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/VotingOnTheWikiIsStupid
___
talk mailing
How precisely is that going to end the debate?
a) Voting isn't the way to do this. It either needs consensus or a
dictator.
Consensus will never happen and we don't have a dictator, which makes
voting the option left.
b) Lots of people don't care about some stupid vote on the wiki
There
2009/10/3 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
Oh, and this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/VotingOnTheWikiIsStupid
Not that I'm
2009/10/3 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
2009/10/3 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
Oh, and this:
2009/10/3 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com:
Actually more important question - why people which love mapping (and
I guess we all do, otherwise we wouldn't be here), are discussing such
simple things as BOOLEAN values in a midday of the Saturday? (ok, for
others it is probably very very early
On 03/10/2009, at 5:54 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Consensus will never happen and we don't have a dictator, which makes
voting the option left.
I actually agree that we just need to pick one, and since yes seems
to be the most commonly used one, that should be it. However, I just
don't see how
Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/boolean_values
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
James Livingston wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
How precisely is that going to end the debate?
a) Voting isn't the way to do this. It either needs consensus or a
dictator.
It will probably demonstrate that there already *is* a consensus to use
John Smith wrote:
The third is generally the best option in practise most of the time,
it should comprise of no more than 10 people, preferably 5 since the
more people involved the less people are going to come to a consensus.
In my experience it's always better to have an odd number off
2009/10/3 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
John Smith wrote:
The third is generally the best option in practise most of the time,
it should comprise of no more than 10 people, preferably 5 since the
more people involved the less people are going to come to a consensus.
In my experience it's
James Livingston wrote:
b) Lots of people don't care about some stupid vote on the wiki
How do you know that?
Did you have a vote on it?
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/10/3 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
James Livingston wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
How precisely is that going to end the debate?
a) Voting isn't the way to do this. It either needs consensus or a
dictator.
It will probably demonstrate
Sorry, I apparently was not clear enough there. I've corrected it on
the wiki. I meant to decide what values to use when boolean values are
intended. The examples given were not intended as examples when only
boolean values are allowed. Instead of bridge=jomenvisst we should use
bridge=yes, and
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:02:07 +0200, Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
I do not think that jumping over Draft and Proposed stages directly to
Voting stage for a Proposal is in accordance with
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
2009/10/3 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
John Smith wrote:
The third is generally the best option in practise most of the time,
it should comprise of no more than 10 people, preferably 5 since the
more people involved the less people are going to
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:45 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
The problem isn't tied to a particular mechanism, it's a social
problem where we currently don't have any form if power structure,
This isn't a problem in itself.
and the one mechanism we have for choosing stuff (voting
2009/10/4 Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com:
boolean values are allowed. Instead of bridge=jomenvisst we should use
bridge=yes, and instead of electrified=naltaseotroligt we should use
Bridge isn't listed as boolean only, you can also have bridge=viaduct
which I've used a few times.
Other values
20 matches
Mail list logo
