Re: [OSM-talk] 2 divided carriage-ways meeting at traffic lights.

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I played a little last night thinking of how a router application might sense junctions and worked out a solution at the way/map level. see: http://www.openstreetmap.com/?lat=51.11773lon=-114.0701zoom=17layers=0BFT (osmarender

Re: [OSM-talk] 2 divided carriage-ways meeting at traffic lights.

snip PS. Why are trunk_links rendered above primary/secondary streets. It make ugly junctions. This has bothered me for a while now but I have not got round to fixing it. It does look ugly and I think is quite easily fixed. At the moment rendering of mway/primary/trunk and their respective

Re: [OSM-talk] 2 divided carriage-ways meeting at traffic lights.

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Steve Chilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip PS. Why are trunk_links rendered above primary/secondary streets. It make ugly junctions. This has bothered me for a while now but I have not got round to fixing it. It does look ugly and I think is quite

Re: [OSM-talk] 2 divided carriage-ways meeting at traffic lights.

I played a little last night thinking of how a router application might sense junctions and worked out a solution at the way/map level. see: http://www.openstreetmap.com/?lat=51.11773lon=-114.0701zoom=17layers=0BFT (osmarender has rendered this, but you have to go to edit to see what I did).

[OSM-talk] 2 divided carriage-ways meeting at traffic lights.

Hi, This type of junction is very common here in Calgary, I just wanted to confirm that I'm constructed it correctly. It's basically two divided carriage ways (parallel, opposite one way streets with curb or larger seperator) crossing at a set of traffic lights. In addition there are normally

Re: [OSM-talk] 2 divided carriage-ways meeting at traffic lights.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sent: 18 March 2008 5:03 PM To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk] 2 divided carriage-ways meeting at traffic lights. Hi, This type of junction is very common here in Calgary, I just wanted to confirm that I'm constructed it correctly. It's basically two divided

Re: [OSM-talk] 2 divided carriage-ways meeting at traffic lights.

On 18/03/2008, Andy Robinson (blackadder) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks good to me. The routing will take into account that you can't travel the wrong way down a one way street. True, but that's only half the battle. It won't take you down the wrong street. However, it may instruct you to

Re: [OSM-talk] 2 divided carriage-ways meeting at traffic lights.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PPS. What's the best way to mark pedestrian overpasses/foot bridges? highway=foot bridge=yes layer=1 Can you specify the height restriction for road underneath? Sure. Place a node on the road under the bridge, and mark the node with maxheight=. Assumed to be