I've a couple of examples, and a couple of questions which might aid the
discussion.
I recently did some work which would label me as both a directee and a
director. For each changeset I added a custom changeset tag which I thought
was the sensible thing to do. It was also helpful for me to be abl
I and colleagues are affected by this policy in that we maintain the map,
which is based on OSM data, for the estate of the University of Cambridge
(obviously, not exclusively, but in practice, most of the work is done by
us, and there are some parts of the estate that aren't generally
accessible).
Thanks Frederik. This is a good explanation. Can some of it perhaps be
added to the document to make it clearer?
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22.11.2017 04:16, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
> > Pierre, I suspect the number of QA-tool-driven changes are as big, if
>
Hi,
On 22.11.2017 04:16, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
> Pierre, I suspect the number of QA-tool-driven changes are as big, if
> not much bigger than changes from the organized events and paid editing.
> I agree QA tools should be regulated, but are you sure we want to do it
> in the same document, and si
november 2017 11.54
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy
Hi,
On 22.11.2017 09:49, Wiklund Johan wrote:
> (first of all, I have not read the backlog of this conversation, only
> the last few messages)
[...]
> Therefore I feel I am opposed to the a
Hi,
On 22.11.2017 09:49, Wiklund Johan wrote:
> (first of all, I have not read the backlog of this conversation, only
> the last few messages)
[...]
> Therefore I feel I am opposed to the absoluteness of the damand of
> hashtagging every changeset
Just as a reminder, the proposed policy leaves
On Wednesday 22 November 2017, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > This policy applies as soon as someone is
> > directed by a third party exactly what and how to contribute to
> > OpenStreetMap.
>
> Maybe it would be a good idea to exclude small scale guided
> editing. For example my friend asked me to s
ri Astrakhan [mailto:yuriastrak...@gmail.com]
Sent: onsdag 22. november 2017 04.16
To: Pierre Béland
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy
Pierre, I suspect the number of QA-tool-driven changes are as big, if not much
bigger than changes from the organized events and paid edit
Pierre, I suspect the number of QA-tool-driven changes are as big, if not
much bigger than changes from the organized events and paid editing. I
agree QA tools should be regulated, but are you sure we want to do it in
the same document, and significantly increase the scope?
My understanding is tha
There is a constant increae of organized contributions from Task Managers on QA
tools and I agree that this policy should include these various organized
contributions.
There should be a goal assure the follow-up of these various projects to assure
a better collective coordination of the mappin
While this might not have been the intention, the
> b) directed by a third party exactly what and how to contribute to
OpenStreetMap
can be applied to any "challenge style" sites such as the MapRoulette or
Osmose. I think there should either be a clarification about this, an
additional discus
> This policy applies as soon as someone is
> directed by a third party exactly what and how to contribute to
> OpenStreetMap.
Maybe it would be a good idea to exclude small scale guided
editing. For example my friend asked me to show how OSM worked.
I showed him/her a map and asked to find some
I posted this announcement to osmf-talk 16 hours ago, where a little
discussion has already taken place. It has been pointed out to me that
it doesn't make sense to involve those who are not members in the
initial survey, but then cut them out later, so here's the announcement
below (even though, i
13 matches
Mail list logo
