Re: [OSM-talk] Georeferencing lots of photos using JOSM

2016-02-14 Thread Robert Norris
> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:28:31 +0100 > From: vosc...@gmail.com > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: [OSM-talk] Georeferencing lots of photos using JOSM > > Hi Russ > > > Solution: I remember where I took every photo (but if I see you > walking on th

Re: [OSM-talk] Georeferencing lots of photos using JOSM

2016-02-14 Thread Robert Norris
> > One open source cross platform program (including Windows) that can > georeference photographs against existing waypoints, tracks or for any place > you choose is Viking. > A link might be useful too: https://sourceforge.net/projects/viking/

[OSM-talk] Georeferencing lots of photos using JOSM

2016-02-14 Thread Volker Schmidt
Hi Russ > Solution: I remember where I took every photo (but if I see you > walking on the street I won't remember your name; go figure), so it's > just a matter of getting a lat/lon and storing it with every > photo. So, I look at the photo, and use JOSM to visit that location. I > add a node

[OSM-talk] Georeferencing lots of photos using JOSM

2016-02-13 Thread Russ Nelson
I'm trying to verify every(!) abandoned railroad bridge in NY with a field trip and a photographic record. It's worth doing, because I found a couple of bridges I thought I could see on the aerials, but which weren't actually there, a few that were reconstructs, not original RR bridges, and a few

Re: [OSM-talk] Georeferencing lots of photos using JOSM

2016-02-13 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi Russ, Am 13.02.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Russ Nelson: > Solution: I remember where I took every photo (but if I see you > walking on the street I won't remember your name; go figure), so it's > just a matter of getting a lat/lon and storing it with every > photo. So, I look at the photo, and use

Re: [OSM-talk] Georeferencing lots of photos using JOSM

2016-02-13 Thread Jorge López
El 13/02/2016 a las 21:41, Russ Nelson escribió: I'm trying to verify every(!) abandoned railroad bridge in NY with a field trip and a photographic record. It's worth doing, because I found a couple of bridges I thought I could see on the aerials, but which weren't actually there, a few that