Re: [OSM-talk] License change/redaction affecting objects geometry

2012-04-12 Thread Robert Norris
My 2p: Leave it to [2]. A. since it is no effort B. any problems created by the redaction should be noticeable by [2] whether it was caused by the bot or *any other normal edit* Apart from deletions, but then the gives mappers (including new mappers!) something to (re)map via local knowledge

Re: [OSM-talk] License change/redaction affecting objects geometry

2012-04-12 Thread Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)
Any help in identifying areas that should be eye-balled and possibly cleaned up would be welcome help indeed. It seems a small bit to attach a tag to any affected ways or relations from which members have been redacted. This will be especially helpful when the editing tools catch up to show t

Re: [OSM-talk] License change/redaction affecting objects geometry

2012-04-12 Thread Pieren
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Jacek Konieczny > The tag sounds like a good idea, but it has one problem: untouched tags > would stay forever even if there is no real problem there. It will be > only unneeded data in the database. Of course, the tags could be removed > by some bot later… but we

Re: [OSM-talk] License change/redaction affecting objects geometry

2012-04-12 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 12.04.2012 13:15, schrieb Jacek Konieczny: Then, I think that the best option would be to add a specific tag which could facilitate the remapping process for the "crowd". The tag sounds like a good idea, but it has one problem: untouched tags would stay forever even if there is no real proble

Re: [OSM-talk] License change/redaction affecting objects geometry

2012-04-12 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:01:46AM +0200, Pieren wrote: > The question is to insert in the rebuild script some kind of reports > or logs about such affected objects or not. Log with id-s and/or location of the detected/expected problems may be helpful and probably easiest to generate without compl

Re: [OSM-talk] License change/redaction affecting objects geometry

2012-04-12 Thread Martin Simon
2012/4/12 Simon Poole : > > > Am 12.04.2012 11:01, schrieb Pieren: >> .. >> Last option is to do nothing since we already have many quality >> assurance tools ([2]) monitoring the contributions. >> > This is IMHO by far the best way of handling any post redaction issues > (not necessarily t

Re: [OSM-talk] License change/redaction affecting objects geometry

2012-04-12 Thread Simon Poole
Am 12.04.2012 11:01, schrieb Pieren: > .. > Last option is to do nothing since we already have many quality > assurance tools ([2]) monitoring the contributions. > This is IMHO by far the best way of handling any post redaction issues (not necessarily the easiest one). Simon _

[OSM-talk] License change/redaction affecting objects geometry

2012-04-12 Thread Pieren
Hi, The rebuild team is warning that the relicensing ("redaction" script) will unsurprisingly affect many objects geometry like ways loosing nodes, intersections with unconnected ways, self-intersecting polygons, roundabouts not round, buildings not square anymore, etc.. ([1]). The question is to