2009/2/24 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
On Monday 23 February 2009 19:52:37 LeedsTracker wrote:
E.g. I take a photo of a level crossing, locate in in Google Maps,
upload and tag it in WikiMedia Commons - no problem it seems.
Is this different from using the same method to adjust the
2009/2/24 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
On Monday 23 February 2009 19:52:37 LeedsTracker wrote:
E.g. I take a photo of a level crossing, locate in in Google Maps,
upload and tag it in WikiMedia Commons - no problem it seems.
Is this different from using the same method to adjust the
2009/2/24 Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk:
2009/2/24 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
On Monday 23 February 2009 19:52:37 LeedsTracker wrote:
E.g. I take a photo of a level crossing, locate in in Google Maps,
upload and tag it in WikiMedia Commons - no problem it seems.
Is this
Please don't use Google Maps when doing OSM. It's just not worth the risk.
I understand that this is a safe and wise rule, but as Wikimedia
Commons' site suggests (and Nic's reply, commenting on talk-legal
discussions), there may be a fair use (or fair dealing) for rectifying
the location of an
On 24/02/2009 09:58, LeedsTracker wrote:
Please don't use Google Maps when doing OSM. It's just not worth the risk.
I understand that this is a safe and wise rule, but as Wikimedia
Commons' site suggests (and Nic's reply, commenting on talk-legal
discussions), there may be a fair use (or
2009/2/24 Donald Allwright donald_allwri...@yahoo.com:
Please don't use Google Maps when doing OSM. It's just not worth the
risk.
I understand that this is a safe and wise rule, but as Wikimedia
Commons' site suggests (and Nic's reply, commenting on talk-legal
discussions), there may be a fair
http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p09_fair_use
I'm guessing that the spelling mistake on the front page (Devirative
works) is an Easter Egg to stop anyone copying it...
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
LeedsTracker wrote:
I do. To be clear, I'm not advocating using Gmaps/G-earth for OSM, I
was just puzzled by the (apparently unproblematic) use of it in
Wikimedia and wondered if a parallel use was justifiable.
Put yourself in the shoes of Google's lawyers - and, more significantly,
those of
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 04:00:22PM +, LeedsTracker wrote:
The concept of fair use is something which differs from one jurisdiction to
another. [snip]
I know, though the principle is in UK law:
http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p09_fair_use
That page is a little misleading.
Hello all,
Sorry to open this up again, but...
I just uploaded my first pic to http://commons.wikimedia.org It gives
the option to add a geo location for where you took the photo from.
This page gives many methods for doing that, including locating on
Google Maps or Google Earth:
Hi,
From what I've read on talk-legal on more than one occasion : Deriving
individual nodes and individual segments on a small scale is OK. Esp.
when they are derived from raw facts (photos and gps traces). But
extracting a whole bunch of nodes and segments that link up is bad.
It's not that
On Monday 23 February 2009 19:52:37 LeedsTracker wrote:
E.g. I take a photo of a level crossing, locate in in Google Maps,
upload and tag it in WikiMedia Commons - no problem it seems.
Is this different from using the same method to adjust the level
crossing node in OSM accordingly?
and just
12 matches
Mail list logo
