On 16 April 2010 19:55, Cartinus wrote:
> On Friday 16 April 2010 20:29:41 Upliner wrote:
>> Current situation is real edit war. I consider some interference is needed.
>
> Sorry, experience has learned that edit wars on the wiki only end when one
> side gets bored with it.
>
I've locked the foll
2010/4/17 Liz :
> We have started to discuss different solutions, but we haven't really had much
> feedback from the PocketGis people on which solutions are more suitable.
I thought that Kirill and Eugene is already made the position of
PocketGis community clear. If it is interesting, there is even
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Upliner wrote:
> 2010/4/17 Kirill Bestoujev :
> > Frederik gave a great advice - if you say that wiki is not a law, just
> > recommendations, then do not take it seriously, let those who want write
> > what they want.
> >
> > Complaining is silly - there is no law, so there can
2010/4/17 Kirill Bestoujev :
> Frederik gave a great advice - if you say that wiki is not a law, just
> recommendations, then do not take it seriously, let those who want write
> what they want.
>
> Complaining is silly - there is no law, so there can be no punishment.
Hey, wait! You've mentioned
2010/4/17 Kirill Bestoujev :
> Edit war with bots is not a way of solving problems... If you do not
> understand that - then my words about small kids were more than right...
> That's very sad...
I don't think that edit war will solve the problem. I just don't
understand what PocketGis guys want.
A
Edit war with bots is not a way of solving problems... If you do not
understand that - then my words about small kids were more than right...
That's very sad...
K.
2010/4/17 Upliner
> 2010/4/17 Kirill Bestoujev :
> > Please do not pay any attention to this stuff - small kids always prefer
> to
2010/4/17 Kirill Bestoujev :
> Please do not pay any attention to this stuff - small kids always prefer to
> complain to the grownups, than to try to solve problems.
>
> K.
Kirill, are you sure that creating a bot will really solve the
problem? If that, I can do it.
--
Best regards,
Upliner
___
Frederik,
there are NO bots, it's just Upliner fantasy. But there were some people on
the complaining side who were discussing creation of bots for osm wiki :)
But they decided not to do it and to accuse others of doing that - talking
is always easy, doing - hard.
Please do not pay any attention
2010/4/16 Cartinus
>
> On Friday 16 April 2010 20:29:41 Upliner wrote:
> > Current situation is real edit war. I consider some interference is needed.
>
> Sorry, experience has learned that edit wars on the wiki only end when one
> side gets bored with it.
There are some hackers on both sides. Wha
Hi,
Nic Roets wrote:
> Our wiki plays a very important role in ensuring convergence of
> tagging standard, esp. homonyms, abstract concepts and those tags that
> are misnomers. In fact, it can be argued that some community members
> have become de facto moderators on the basis of the bots they ope
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Cartinus wrote:
> Sorry, experience has learned that edit wars on the wiki only end when one
> side gets bored with it.
Surely this needs to be improved. Perhaps learn from Wikipedia and
appoint Wiki moderators.
Our wiki plays a very important role in ensuring co
On Friday 16 April 2010 20:29:41 Upliner wrote:
> Current situation is real edit war. I consider some interference is needed.
Sorry, experience has learned that edit wars on the wiki only end when one
side gets bored with it.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
___
> On the other hand this
> vote is (like all votes in OSM) not binding but only demonstrating the
> majority's (of the voters) consensus.
However, Vctos and others is constantly trying to mislead the community
claiming that voting MUST be obligatory. To prevent this misunderstanding
Zkir added the
2010/4/15 Lester Caine :
> Of cause what is missing here is that since this 'vote' was only in Russian
> then
> the vast majority of us would not even be able to vote anyway. There should
> perhaps be a rule about needing all votes to carry an English translation,
> since
> the consensus IS that
Kirill Bestoujev wrote:
>
>
> 2010/4/15 Lester Caine mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk>>
>
>
> Of cause what is missing here is that since this 'vote' was only in
> Russian then
> the vast majority of us would not even be able to vote anyway. There
> should
> perhaps be a rule about nee
Alexandr Zeinalov wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Alexandr Zeinalov wrote:
>>> Good day.
>>>
>>> You should know about flame war about military objects and government
>>> secrets in Russian OSM community. And you should know that any voting
>>> results may be considered as and only as r
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Alexandr Zeinalov wrote:
>> Good day.
>>
>> You should know about flame war about military objects and government
>> secrets in Russian OSM community. And you should know that any voting
>> results may be considered as and only as recommendation, but not as
>> in
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Alexandr Zeinalov wrote:
> Good day.
>
> You should know about flame war about military objects and government
> secrets in Russian OSM community. And you should know that any voting
> results may be considered as and only as recommendation, but not as
> invariable
Alex,
Alexandr Zeinalov wrote:
> Since that user Vctos http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Vctos
> removed this warning 3 times with comment: "I deleted text about
> applicability of voting results that added after RFC" (translation).
I recommend to ignore it. If you insist that the Wiki site
Good day.
You should know about flame war about military objects and government
secrets in Russian OSM community. And you should know that any voting
results may be considered as and only as recommendation, but not as
invariable law.
At 2010-04-13 user Zkir http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User
20 matches
Mail list logo