SteveC asklater.com> writes:
>
> I discovered that people are just rectifying using google aerial and
> stuff, which breaks our paranoid/cautious stance on accepting
> copyright derived work.
I speak now only about the i-cubed Landsat layer because OpenAerialMap does not
have anything bette
Hi,
> Doesn't feel to me like a confident, unambigious, "free to use in
> OSM" phrase.
On the other hand, we don't have anything in written from Yahoo!
either, so if you want to be paranoid then drop Yahoo as well.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00'09" E008
Steve Hill wrote:
> Aren't OSM's GPS traces considered CC-BY-SA as well? I haven't seen
> anything specifically licensing them, but they are in the OSM database,
> accessible via the OSM API so I err on the side of assuming the
> CC-BY-SA licence applies to them too.
They're not explicitly licen
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> (It's reasonably easily settled - either get Google to give the ok, or
> rerectify against OSM. Better still, rerectify against OSM's GPS
> traces alone, thereby sidestepping potential CC-BY-SA issues.)
Aren't OSM's GPS traces considered CC-BY-SA as
Is there any way to enable only "safe" data layers from OAM in Potlatch?
I am writing this, because there is black and white aerial imagery of
the Czech Republic from local goverment agency (UHUL), which permitted
to use it for OSM mapping. This imagery is now part of OAM data.
It is possible to u
[cc:ed to legal-talk]
Andy Allan wrote:
> That's pretty clear cut - i-Cubed own copyright over the imagery, and
> haven't given anyone any rights to do stuff with them - unless they
> explicitly say otherwise. "Public Domain" isn't viral for derived
> works.
Probably the biggest thing I've learn
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Jukka Rahkonen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that what is uncertain with OpenAerialMap is if the imagery that is
> colour adjusted by i-Cubed can be taken out from OAM, not if you can do
> derived
> work based on it.
That's pretty clear cut - i-Cubed own c
Andy Allan gmail.com> writes:
>
> The wording of the main/first data source never filled me with
> confidence either:
>
> "There is currently some question as to the licensing terms for this
> data. This is being resolved as quickly as possible. Until then, it is
> best to assume that this imag
The wording of the main/first data source never filled me with
confidence either:
"There is currently some question as to the licensing terms for this
data. This is being resolved as quickly as possible. Until then, it is
best to assume that this imagery can not be used outside of
OpenAerialMap."
I discovered that people are just rectifying using google aerial and
stuff, which breaks our paranoid/cautious stance on accepting
copyright derived work.
On 21 May 2008, at 21:55, Tomáš Tichý wrote:
> What happened to Openaerialmap layer in Potlatch? I see only -
> signs on the place
What happened to Openaerialmap layer in Potlatch? I see only -
signs on the place where it was in menu.
Tomas Tichy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
11 matches
Mail list logo
