There is still one small problem with the redesign that maybe could be
addressed: coordinates when sharing, e.g. from clicking on node coordinates
in the history. When you check the edits of new users by looking at their
changesets, sometimes you'll see nodes moved or deleted and want to check
Kai Krueger wrote:
I am not a fan of just changing things to make them prettier without
adding functionality, or even less of the website hasn't changed in X
years, we need to change things to make it modern either, but having
multiple versions beyond what we already have is just likely not
I don't have to live with someone else's preferences.
On the internet, you have been. For years now, every single day.
Everybody is off making a better 'widget' for their pet project and
nobody is looking at the problem as a whole?
You mean in OSM? Look at how much push-back we get on
Tom MacWright wrote:
I don't have to live with someone else's preferences.
On the internet, you have been. For years now, every single day.
No - If I don't like something I don't use it ... that includes Google!
Everybody is off making a better 'widget' for their pet project and nobody
On 22/lug/2013, at 14:41, Tom MacWright t...@macwright.org wrote:
You mean in OSM? Look at how much push-back we get on something like Map-UI -
tens of angry comments about how X changed. Now imagine a much larger
redesign.
was that really so much? In my perception it was very few (if
was that really so much? In my perception it was very few (if any, less
than 3) who were generally against it, the rest were kind of bug reports,
unfortunately not always setting the right tone.
52 messages in the 'Upgraded map controls' thread, 13 in this one, 12 in
the one split off of this
Tom MacWright wrote:
52 messages in the 'Upgraded map controls' thread, 13 in this one, 12 in the one
split off of this one, 39 comments on the pull request. Around 116 messages in
total, though that's only the English count and I'm sure that there's something
on talk-de.
Tom will you PLEASE
@openstreetmap.org
Envoyéle : Lundi 22 juillet 2013 9h27
Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] New technology ...
On 22/lug/2013, at 14:41, Tom MacWright t...@macwright.org wrote:
You mean in OSM? Look at how much push-back we get on something like Map-UI -
tens of angry comments about how X changed. Now imagine a much
With the arrival of a 'new' set of controls, and the discussion on front
page, I feel that it IS necessary to open this discussion a little wider.
Having been using the new interface on mobile devices I find it much less
usable than the older set-up. But that is not to say that the old one was
With the arrival of a 'new' set of controls, and the discussion on front page, I
feel that it IS necessary to open this discussion a little wider. Having been
using the new interface on mobile devices I find it much less usable than the
older set-up. But that is not to say that the old one was
Hey Lester,
I agree entirely - thus far we aren't focusing on the mobile version of the
site. It's never been very polished, and recent changes aren't focused on
improving it significantly.
As far as why, it's pretty simple - changes to the site are extremely
time-intensive because of its myriad
Tom MacWright wrote:
Hey Lester,
I agree entirely - thus far we aren't focusing on the mobile version of the
site. It's never been very polished, and recent changes aren't focused on
improving it significantly.
As far as why, it's pretty simple - changes to the site are extremely
Hi Lester,
The most productive way to lead to better routing on OSM is to find 'bad'
routes, generate permalinks on OSRM or your favorite tool, and post bug
reports, including what the desired route would be and what's incorrect
about the incorrect route. For OSRM in particular the bug tracker is
...@macwright.org
To: Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
Cc: openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:19
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New technology ...
Hi Lester,
The most productive way to lead to better routing on OSM is to find 'bad'
routes, generate permalinks on OSRM or your favorite tool
lsces wrote
With the arrival of a 'new' set of controls, and the discussion on front
page, I
feel that it IS necessary to open this discussion a little wider. Having
been
using the new interface on mobile devices I find it much less usable than
the
older set-up. But that is not to say
For what it's worth, for those who want to use the Notes facility of OSM
remotely, I've worked on a predictably open source
https://github.com/osmlab/osm-note boringly named project called OSM Note,
that you can open on your phone like so
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-note/and place notes, log in,
lsces wrote
The problem is more fundamental than just bad routes, but I suspect Locus
is part of the problem as all 4 routers have the same problem. Routing
instructions through any junction with link_xxx gives a 'straight on'
rather than advising to take the slip road. None of the posts to
Kai Krueger wrote:
lsces wrote
The problem is more fundamental than just bad routes, but I suspect Locus
is part of the problem as all 4 routers have the same problem. Routing
instructions through any junction with link_xxx gives a 'straight on'
rather than advising to take the slip road. None
Kai Krueger wrote:
One question would therefore be, what functionality of osm.org would you
hope to actually be able to use on a mobile phone?
Browsing the map to see if an alternate route might be better. Not knowing where
one is scale wise, the old scale bar provides an easy and quick to
lsces wrote
Kai Krueger wrote:
One question would therefore be, what functionality of osm.org would you
hope to actually be able to use on a mobile phone?
Browsing the map to see if an alternate route might be better. Not knowing
where
one is scale wise, the old scale bar provides an easy
20 matches
Mail list logo
