do you think that you can update the data before we enter to the read only
phase? I don't want to push you...you data was very helpful for remapping.
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/ODbL-clean-Coastlines-tp5591448p5607499.html
Sent from the General Discussion
Paul Norman wrote
When examining the data, I found most of the ODbL-dirty status was mainly
from the following accounts:
hasse_osm_korinthenkacker (Antarctica)
Kin (Antarctica)
Blars (US West coast)
Actually, in might be pretty simple in the first case. To the best of my
knowledge, the
just fyithe generation of the processedc_p failed. It say it has 46 Byte.
coastlinec_p seems to be okay
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/ODbL-clean-Coastlines-tp5591448p5604606.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From: ThomasB [mailto:toba0...@yahoo.de]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
just fyithe generation of the processedc_p failed. It say it has 46
Byte.
coastlinec_p seems to be okay
My jxapi instance is lagged behind - it lost its state.txt file in a crash
and fell a couple
On 3/24/2012 7:13 AM, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
- Adopting changesets. Many of the dirty ways and nodes appear to be
imported. If the imported just imported PD data than they have no IP
in the
ways and they can be retained.
Are you
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server, using the
latest data from my jxapi server. Tonight I switched it over to filter out
data that WTFE reports as dirty. This is somewhat more aggressive than the
rebuild will be, but the results are worrisome.
A PNG showing the OSM
- Original Message -
From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 9:34 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server, using the
latest data from my jxapi server. Tonight I
I was just going to suggest this, while it limits you to CC_by-SA 2.0
as a licence for tiles (or similar), there is no reason that you
couldn't use a pre-licence change coastline for rendering (in the case
of the main OSM site, the tiles are going to remain CC-by-SA 2.0 anyway).
Simon
Am
One advantage of remapping is the possibility that there are now better data
sets available for import than the PGS data which was originally used. I'm
particularly thinking here of the US Canada.
This is exactly what I've been doing – non-safe coastline in the UK using the
OS OpenData
Paul Norman writes:
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server, using the
latest data from my jxapi server. Tonight I switched it over to filter out
data that WTFE reports as dirty. This is somewhat more aggressive than the
rebuild will be, but the results are
- Original Message -
From: Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com
To: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my
David Groom writes:
more error free. Had I now been a CT decliner I see no legal difference
between the resulting data in this instance and data which If it was
subsequently edited by a decliner, well, that's different.
How would we ever know? They're anonymous. If they want to come
On 24.03.2012 19:12, Russ Nelson wrote:
David Groom writes:
more error free. Had I now been a CT decliner I see no legal difference
between the resulting data in this instance and data which If it was
subsequently edited by a decliner, well, that's different.
How would we ever know?
-Original Message-
From: Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 7:42 AM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server
Stephan Knauss writes:
Users not agreeing or not responding have to be treated the same way,
regardless of their nick known or not.
Non-responsive.
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815
Potsdam, NY
-Original Message-
From: David Groom [mailto:revi...@pacific-rim.net]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
- Original Message -
From: Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
I have been running
Paul Norman writes:
It's particularly galling that anonymous users who haven't accepted or
declined are having their copyright respected. If you don't post your
land *with your name and address* in New York State, you cannot
successfully pursue a claim of trespass.
Copyright
-Original Message-
From: Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 2:21 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
It's particularly galling that anonymous users who haven't accepted
- Original Message -
From: Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
It's particularly galling that anonymous users who haven't accepted or
declined
David Groom writes:
But all theories of law aside, as a practical matter, if someone
hasn't bothered to decline, they're not going to bother to sue. You
The argument hey, we understand we don't know if we have any right to use
this data, buts lets leave it in and hope no one
20 matches
Mail list logo
