Hi Ed,
On 17 December 2010 13:43, Ed Parsons wrote:
> Last month back Steve Coast contacted us to let us know that he had
> identified what may have been OpenStreetMap data in Google Maps of Colombia.
> We raised this issue with our provider for Colombia, and they agreed to
> remove the disputed
Last month back Steve Coast contacted us to let us know that he had
identified what may have been OpenStreetMap data in Google Maps of Colombia.
We raised this issue with our provider for Colombia, and they agreed to
remove the disputed data from their data set while they continue to discuss
the m
Dear Ed an all ..
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Ed Parsons wrote:
> Last week Steve Coast contacted us to let us know that he had identified
> what may have been OpenStreetMap data in Google Maps of Colombia. We
> investigated the matter and determined that one of our providers had indeed
> i
Fredy,
I think they will not tell you who sold them the OSM data. The same thing
happened with Waze when I asked about their provider for the Chilean OSM
Data. They told us that LocationWorld sold them the data (at least the first
time) and that a provider of that company was the one to be blamed
Ed Parsons google.com> writes:
>Although we feel unable to license OSM data at present, we remain supporters
>of the project, and we will without question act in a similar way if the
>rights of the OSM community and your data is abused.
From Google's point of view what would be needed so that yo
I strongly agree... Most errors are honest mistakes and we should always start
with the presumption of innocence.
Jim Brown
(Sent from my iPhone)
On 3 Nov 2010, at 09:35, "Jukka Rahkonen" wrote:
> Martijn van Exel rtijn.org> writes:
>
>>
>>
>> Ed - Big thumbs up for the quick response to
Martijn van Exel rtijn.org> writes:
>
>
> Ed - Big thumbs up for the quick response to this. Makes one wonder though -
> how much OSM data lives in Google Maps without us / you knowing about it, and
> what measures can you take / are in place to prevent and detect this?
I am pretty sure that
Let's keep license change discussions to legal-talk. I suspect that
whoever is doing this either just found "free" data and chose not to
read the fine print or just didn't care once they had the data. Which
license we are currently using probably wasn't even considered so it
doesn't matter to this
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:01 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2010/11/3 Anthony :
>> Why? According to the very organization distributing the data, the
>> license doesn't apply.
>
> Well, isn't it more "it might not apply"? Maybe we won't win a case
> but maybe we would actually.
I think "quite l
2010/11/3 Anthony :
> Why? According to the very organization distributing the data, the
> license doesn't apply.
Well, isn't it more "it might not apply"? Maybe we won't win a case
but maybe we would actually.
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
ta
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:04 PM, john whelan wrote:
>> Does it matter?
>
> Does it matter that there is some company out there that is making
> lots of money selling map data while violating our (very generous)
> licensing terms? Yes... Yes I th
On 2 November 2010 22:14, Richard Mann wrote:
> As far as I am concerned anyone is free to use the data I've put into
> OSM, as long as they let me have access to a reasonable amount of
> stuff in return. Share and share alike.
>
> I'd rather they'd kept the data, and offered to allow some to be
>
As far as I am concerned anyone is free to use the data I've put into
OSM, as long as they let me have access to a reasonable amount of
stuff in return. Share and share alike.
I'd rather they'd kept the data, and offered to allow some to be
available in exchange.
Richard
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:04 PM, john whelan wrote:
> Does it matter?
Does it matter that there is some company out there that is making
lots of money selling map data while violating our (very generous)
licensing terms? Yes... Yes I think it does matter.
Toby
___
Am 02.11.2010 22:58, schrieb Toby Murray:
Hmm this isn't the first time that OSM data has found its way into
some 3rd party platform via some unnamed "provider." Do google, etc
not ask any questions about the data source from these providers? Or
are the provider(s) lying about it?
There's a d
Does it matter?
Cheerio John
On 2 November 2010 17:58, Toby Murray wrote:
> Hmm this isn't the first time that OSM data has found its way into
> some 3rd party platform via some unnamed "provider." Do google, etc
> not ask any questions about the data source from these providers? Or
> are the p
Hmm this isn't the first time that OSM data has found its way into
some 3rd party platform via some unnamed "provider." Do google, etc
not ask any questions about the data source from these providers? Or
are the provider(s) lying about it?
Toby
___
talk
Am 02.11.2010 09:41, schrieb Ed Parsons:
once we learned this we removed the data as quickly as possible.
I think this is the essence of not being evil :)
Although we feel unable to license OSM data at present
Would this change with a switch ODbL?
Peter
_
Ed - Big thumbs up for the quick response to this. Makes one wonder though -
how much OSM data lives in Google Maps without us / you knowing about it, and
what measures can you take / are in place to prevent and detect this?
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
Laziness – Impatience – Hu
On 2 November 2010 14:11, Ed Parsons wrote:
> Although we feel unable to license OSM data at
> present, we remain supporters of the project, and we will without question
> act in a similar way if the rights of the OSM community and your data is
> abused.
Thats cool . Glad to hear from you ed . y
Last week Steve Coast contacted us to let us know that he had identified
what may have been OpenStreetMap data in Google Maps of Colombia. We
investigated the matter and determined that one of our providers had indeed
included OSM data in the data-set they provided to us, once we learned this we
r
21 matches
Mail list logo
