Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-16 Thread Peter Körner
Am 16.09.2010 16:19, schrieb Lars Francke: My number 1 priority though is fresh data but unfortunately stuff keeps getting in the way and I have very little time at the moment. I hoped to get something done before October but I'm not sure yet. In which language is OSMDoc written and is the sour

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-16 Thread Lars Francke
>> My number 1 priority though is fresh data but unfortunately stuff >> keeps getting in the way and I have very little time at the moment. I >> hoped to get something done before October but I'm not sure yet. > > In which language is OSMDoc written and is the sourcecode public available? > Maybe I

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-16 Thread Peter Körner
Am 16.09.2010 01:56, schrieb Lars Francke: My number 1 priority though is fresh data but unfortunately stuff keeps getting in the way and I have very little time at the moment. I hoped to get something done before October but I'm not sure yet. In which language is OSMDoc written and is the sour

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-15 Thread Lars Francke
Hi Dave, sorry I missed your mail or forgot to answer. Thanks for the reminder. > The search facility appears to only search the key tag & not the values tag. > Is there a way to overcome this? > > For instance - parking. It doesn't list amenity=parking or any other > *=parking. the current OSMd

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-09 Thread Peter Körner
Am 03.09.2010 11:09, schrieb Lars Francke: Wow! That's awesome. Thank you for your work. I'll be back home next week and will give it a go then. Did you get anywhere? Do you need something? I could run it against a planet file on the wikimedia toolserver, I think, and supply you with a compre

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread Peter Körner
Am 03.09.2010 13:23, schrieb Peter Körner: Ah, I see. The Planet-Extracts I worked with had the changesets stripped out, so I haven't thought about that. I'll change the script to import the changeset count, too. I have implemented the changeset count now. There's no filter capability (eg. dro

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread Peter Körner
Am 03.09.2010 11:09, schrieb Lars Francke: The database schema is pretty easy though so if anyone has data laying around this is what I would need I've put together a script that creates this schema [1]. I used php& expat for the xml parsing and pl/pgsql for the counting/update/insert part.

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread Lars Francke
>> The database schema is pretty easy though so if anyone has data laying >> around this is what I would need > > I've put together a script that creates this schema [1]. I used php & expat > for the xml parsing and pl/pgsql for the counting/update/insert part. Wow! That's awesome. Thank you for y

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread Sam Vekemans
hi Peter, It will be great to see your resaults, then i can compare them with the current tagging system used by CanVec/Tiger/linz/garmin/mapnik/cyclemap/josm/potlatch/mapzen/merkaartor and others. I found that many tags are 'primary tag dependent', meaning that using the tag alone on a node/way/

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> Am 01.09.2010 15:15, schrieb Lars Francke: >> >> The database schema is pretty easy though so if anyone has data laying >> around this is what I would need: >> >> tag_keys: id integer, total_count integer, changeset_count integer, >> node_count integer, relation_count integer, way_count integer,

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread Peter Körner
Am 01.09.2010 15:15, schrieb Lars Francke: The database schema is pretty easy though so if anyone has data laying around this is what I would need: tag_keys: id integer, total_count integer, changeset_count integer, node_count integer, relation_count integer, way_count integer, name character va

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-01 Thread Peter Körner
Am 01.09.2010 22:32, schrieb Peter Körner: it took 6m50.329s for the germany/bremen extract [2] which is about 4MB of bz2 compressed xml (imported 65046 nodes, 125824 ways). I just ran it on a much faster server and it took 0m33.193s for the same extract. This sounds reasonable. I won't be a

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-01 Thread Peter Körner
Am 01.09.2010 15:15, schrieb Lars Francke: OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a more modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report myself - very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but functional to get a breakdown of tag usage.

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-01 Thread Lars Francke
>> What is the problem in running the import, that you did once, again, >> completely replacing the outdated data. > > he wrote on the German ML that he lost the program which did the import. Thank you Martin. He is correct. I don't have the script anymore that did the import and it didn't work v

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-01 Thread Dave F.
On 01/09/2010 14:15, Lars Francke wrote: Well thank you very much. Cheers, Lars (author of OSMdoc) Hi Lars The search facility appears to only search the key tag & not the values tag. Is there a way to overcome this? For instance - parking. It doesn't list amenity=parking or any other

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-01 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/1 Peter Körner : > What is the problem in running the import, that you did once, again, > completely replacing the outdated data. he wrote on the German ML that he lost the program which did the import. cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-01 Thread Peter Körner
Am 01.09.2010 15:15, schrieb Lars Francke: OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a more modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report myself - very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but functional to get a breakdown of tag usage. I

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-01 Thread Lars Francke
> OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date.  I needed a more > modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report myself - > very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but functional to > get a breakdown of tag usage.  I figured someone else might like to r

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-01 Thread Dave F.
On 01/09/2010 12:56, Jörg Ehrichs wrote: And just to get a full list. There is also the older, but still working and updated Tagwatch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagwatch http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/ I maybe missing something, but is there a search facility? Cheers Dave F. __

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-01 Thread Jörg Ehrichs
John Harvey wrote: > OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. ... Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2010, 13:40:23 schrieb Pierre-Alain Dorange: > In cas you don't know it, there is tagstat, a little bit slow but more > accurate and with updated data : > >

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-01 Thread Pierre-Alain Dorange
John Harvey wrote: > OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a > more modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report > myself - very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but > functional to get a breakdown of tag usage. I figured some

[OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-08-31 Thread John Harvey
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a more modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report myself - very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but functional to get a breakdown of tag usage. I figured someone else might like to read