Re: [OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-30 Thread Matthew
Apologies if someone's mentioned it already, but I'd like to express my appreciation for the new symbol for a barrier across the road.  A simple line is exactly what it should be; a letter G in the middle of the road was rather confusing! ___

[OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-29 Thread David Ebling
I've noticed a lot of changes to the Mapnik slippymap rendering lately, and IMHO they are mainly not improvements. As the appearance of this map layer has a large impact on the public face of OSM, I think it's important to have lots of people discuss their views on this. Personally I don't

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-29 Thread Tom Hughes
David Ebling wrote: -Primary, trunk and secondary roads have no casing on them. This makes road junctions into a big mess, and you can't see what's what at all. I believe Steve has already says he plans to reintroduce more casings. -The road refs aren't centred properly in their boxes. This

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-29 Thread Gustav Foseid
Is there anywhere I can find the stylesheet used for the main Mapnik layer? - Gustav ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-29 Thread Grant Slater
Gustav Foseid wrote: Is there anywhere I can find the stylesheet used for the main Mapnik layer? http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/rendering/mapnik/ osm-template-fontset.xml AFAIK. I also think you also need the latest SVN mapnik. / Grant

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-29 Thread Dave Stubbs
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:52 PM, David Ebling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed a lot of changes to the Mapnik slippymap rendering lately, and IMHO they are mainly not improvements. As the appearance of this map layer has a large impact on the public face of OSM, I think it's important

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-29 Thread Andy Allan
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:52 PM, David Ebling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As the appearance of this map layer has a large impact on the public face of OSM, I think it's important to have lots of people discuss their views on this. It's helpful up to a point, but there's a certain amount of art

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-29 Thread Brian Quinion
-The road refs aren't centred properly in their boxes. This looks really poor. Also, they aren't as clear as the used to be. Actually a technical issue, so this time not a judgement call :-) This is the only thing which isn't really an opinion! I'm currently trying to add options to mapnik

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-29 Thread Tom Hughes
Brian Quinion wrote: -The road refs aren't centred properly in their boxes. This looks really poor. Also, they aren't as clear as the used to be. Actually a technical issue, so this time not a judgement call :-) This is the only thing which isn't really an opinion! I'm currently trying to

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-29 Thread Michal Migurski
I'm really looking to spark discussion here, rather than be critical, though unfortunately all of my comments happen to be negative. Here are some positives (they're not that hard to find): - Colour scheme is now much more consistent Consistently bland. =( -- OSM is about more than

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent changes to slippymap Mapnik rendering

2008-10-29 Thread Brian Quinion
resolved, see also: https://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/104 That ticket has nothing to do with the problem we're discussing here ;-) The ticket is about how a shield is positioned relative to a POI, but we're talking about the positioning of text relative to the shield symbol that surrounds it.