I second that it should stay brown! There are way to many green objects and
we don't want it confused with the grass tag. My vote would be to play
around with the brown color. I certainly agree that it currently isn't the
best.
Cheers,
ingalls
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Lennard
Green grass would be useful to differentiate between pasture and use a lighter
brown for arable fields.
Not much farmland is tagged at present, but I it was envisage the map becoming
largely brown which will not be attractive. Most areas that are currently
default background are in reality
Aun Johnsen
On 7. jan. 2013, at 15:48, talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
. Most areas that are currently default background are in reality farmland.
Phil (trigpoint)
Not true, most untagged areas are either some form of wilderness, farmlands, or
on some rare occurances tagged with
On 6 January 2013 01:54, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer landuse areas to be darker than the default light gray background
color in the Standard rendering. This makes it obvious (especially on LCD
screens where lightness/luminance of colors vary depending on the viewing
Thanks for the initial feedback. I also had one off list in support of the
light green. Please keep them coming.
I will play with a couple more shades this evening and post an update.
Rob
On Sunday, 6 January 2013, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer landuse areas to be darker
When using OSM on my phone, windscreen mount, whilst driving I find the
biggest contrast problem is the green of forests can mask the green of
trunk roads, where the road passes through forest Would be nice is the
forest green could be lighter.
Phil (trigpoint)
Rob Nickerson wrote
This has led to a discussion about how the rendering 'looks' with
some arguing that it doesn't look that good. I believe that this may be
due
to the shade of colour used – specifically the farmland 'brown' is not as
luminous as the default 'grey'.
+1
What's more: The
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 05:19 -0800, NopMap wrote:
Rob Nickerson wrote
This has led to a discussion about how the rendering 'looks' with
some arguing that it doesn't look that good. I believe that this may be
due
to the shade of colour used – specifically the farmland 'brown' is not as
On 01/06/2013 02:34 PM, Philip Barnes wrote:
I would prefer to simply see the field boundaries mapped and unless
there is some way to distinguish between arable and pasture then
farmland does not really offer much that isn't obvious.
That's why a lot of people use farm(land) only for arable
Hi
Farmyards are about the right shade.
Fields eg landuse=farmland is slight too dark could do with
lightening. My preference would be to still with a brown rather than a
green (far too many items are already green - sports pitches are too
dark IMO).
On a related topic; if a field has a
On 6-1-2013 15:51, Dave F. wrote:
On a related topic; if a field has a barrier tag it changes colour
rendering at zoom 16:
That's because having a landuse on it as well pushes it into the polygon
table. It's subsequently rendered as a barrier area, ie. with the
barrier=hedge fill.
--
Hi all,
Thanks for the feedback. I have tested some other shades:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6J5ZA1hu93bMzVMQ1Z1SHFqcmM
Any additional comments are very welcome.
Rob
On 5 January 2013 22:18, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
(full text and images at
On 6 January 2013 19:13, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. I have tested some other shades:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6J5ZA1hu93bMzVMQ1Z1SHFqcmM
I think the first of the new ones under Update 1 (lighter brown;
same lightness as landuse=residential)
On 6 January 2013 01:54, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer landuse areas to be darker than the default light gray background
color in the Standard rendering. This makes it obvious (especially on LCD
screens where lightness/luminance of colors vary depending on the viewing
On 06/01/2013 10:13, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
On 6 January 2013 01:54, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
In the first proposal, I find it very difficult to see the difference
between the farmland and the non-tagged areas. It's a bit easier in
the second proposal. It could
Hi All,
(full text and images at
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6J5ZA1hu93bYm9IWXdlVHM1N1U )
Recently landuse=farmland (or simply landuse=farm) has been added to fields
near me. This has led to a discussion about how the rendering 'looks' with
some arguing that it doesn't look that good. I
I should add that if you want to play with Hue, Saturation and Lightness
(HSL) and Luminance then the following is a good place to start:
http://www.workwithcolor.com/hsl-color-picker-01.htm
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
I prefer landuse areas to be darker than the default light gray background
color in the Standard rendering. This makes it obvious (especially on LCD
screens where lightness/luminance of colors vary depending on the viewing
angle) that there is a tagged area there.
You could make the case that the
18 matches
Mail list logo
