+1!
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Pavel Melnikov positro...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 Another Thank you from another almost silent mapper
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
+1
I totally agree, a few negative are always more visible than a lot of
silent positive !
Sylvain
2013/1/9 RB tan...@gmail.com
+1
Thank you very much from a silent mapper.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Rob Nickerson
rob.j.nicker...@gmail.comwrote:
Richard, (All,)
I read your
Yes, and thank you from a unsilent mapper as well.
I've said for a long time that there's a small, silent group of folks
in OSM that are its heart, that keep it going, both in the technical
and practical sense. You are one of those, as is Tom Hughes, Grant
Slator, Andy Allen and Matt Amos.
You
+1 Another Thank you from another almost silent mapper
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Richard, (All,)
I read your email below and it saddened me that you feel this way. I
therefore want to write a quick thank-you on behalf of the silent layer of
contributors. We are grateful for the work that all developers put into
OSM and please do not feel disheartened by a few negative
+ 1
2013/1/8 Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
Richard, (All,)
I read your email below and it saddened me that you feel this way. I
therefore want to write a quick thank-you on behalf of the silent layer of
contributors. We are grateful for the work that all developers put into
OSM
+1
On Jan 8, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard, (All,)
I read your email below and it saddened me that you feel this way. I
therefore want to write a quick thank-you on behalf of the silent layer of
contributors. We are grateful for the work that
+1
Thank you very much from a silent mapper.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.comwrote:
Richard, (All,)
I read your email below and it saddened me that you feel this way. I
therefore want to write a quick thank-you on behalf of the silent layer of
a quick thank you to those mappers who have contributed a substantial amount of
roman features to the map in the last few weeks.
I have now got about 20% of my initial tracing of about 11,000 km of roman
roads narrowed down to a comfortable level of accuracy.
Many thanks
mick
On Viernes 24 Junio 2011 03:45:39 Richard Weait escribió:
Thank you so much, sysadmins, for all that you do to keep OSM running
every day. And that you especially for making the server move today
look so smooth.
Which reminds me that I didn't buy them a beer (and I had the opportunity). I
Hi all.
OpenStreetMap came through the scheduled maintenance on 23 June in
great shape.
We should all thank the sysadmin team for making the server move
happen. Grant, Andy and Harry were all on site at one or both ends of
the move. Andy's friend Mark helped out as well on site. Tom was
On 24 June 2011 02:45, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
OpenStreetMap came through the scheduled maintenance on 23 June in
great shape.
Pictures or it didn't happen!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/harrywood/5863059620/in/photostream
I actually have a bone to pick. I was going to try and do some
maintenance on a box here at home while the OSM servers were down in
the hopes that my replication setup wouldn't get so far behind. But
because they got things done quicker than the advertised 12 hours, I
didn't have a chance to get
Grant Slater openstreetmap at firefishy.com writes:
http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/
That summary page is great but unfortunately it's not what is on offer.
The real text of the ODbL is much more complex,
Quote from Creative Commons BY SA Summary Disclaimer:
The Commons
Jonas Krückel osm at jonas-krueckel.de writes:
I'm not sure if the CC-BY-SA license is really simpler than ODbL. Just look at
this website here http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/ and
you'll see that the ODbL is as simple as CC-BY-SA.
That summary page is great but
2009/12/7 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com:
Jonas Krückel osm at jonas-krueckel.de writes:
I'm not sure if the CC-BY-SA license is really simpler than ODbL. Just look at
this website here http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/ and
you'll see that the ODbL is as simple as CC-BY-SA.
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 09:13:14PM -0700, SteveC wrote:
Richard Weait schrieb:
I think the LWG has done a good job on a difficult task. A task that
we, as a community, asked them to do for us because we couldn't
implement a license change as a group of 20,000 (at the time)
individual
Am 06.12.2009 um 10:47 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 09:13:14PM -0700, SteveC wrote:
Richard Weait schrieb:
I think the LWG has done a good job on a difficult task. A task that
we, as a community, asked them to do for us because we couldn't
implement a license change as a
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Jonas Krückel o...@jonas-krueckel.dewrote:
Am 06.12.2009 um 10:47 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 09:13:14PM -0700, SteveC wrote:
Richard Weait schrieb:
I think the LWG has done a good job on a difficult task. A task that
we, as a
Apollinaris Schoell schrieb:
On 5 Dec 2009, at 20:03 , Ulf Lamping wrote:
I'm sorry, but for the last two years I can't remember asking for a
license change at all.
Sorry but this topic was many times on many lists, it's on the wiki. If you
didn't care then why do you care now?
You may
On 6 Dec 2009, at 10:25 , Ulf Lamping wrote:
Apollinaris Schoell schrieb:
On 5 Dec 2009, at 20:03 , Ulf Lamping wrote:
I'm sorry, but for the last two years I can't remember asking for a license
change at all.
Sorry but this topic was many times on many lists, it's on the wiki. If you
Apollinaris Schoell schrieb:
On 6 Dec 2009, at 10:25 , Ulf Lamping wrote:
Apollinaris Schoell schrieb:
On 5 Dec 2009, at 20:03 , Ulf Lamping wrote:
I'm sorry, but for the last two years I can't remember asking for a
license change at all.
Sorry but this topic was many times on many lists,
I think the LWG has done a good job on a difficult task. A task that
we, as a community, asked them to do for us because we couldn't
implement a license change as a group of 20,000 (at the time)
individual mappers. I'm glad that the LWG looked after our shared
concerns so ably, by consulting
Richard Weait schrieb:
I think the LWG has done a good job on a difficult task. A task that
we, as a community, asked them to do for us because we couldn't
implement a license change as a group of 20,000 (at the time)
individual mappers. I'm glad that the LWG looked after our shared
On Dec 5, 2009, at 21:03, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Richard Weait schrieb:
I think the LWG has done a good job on a difficult task. A task that
we, as a community, asked them to do for us because we couldn't
implement a license change as a group of 20,000 (at the time)
On 5 Dec 2009, at 20:03 , Ulf Lamping wrote:
Richard Weait schrieb:
I think the LWG has done a good job on a difficult task. A task that
we, as a community, asked them to do for us because we couldn't
implement a license change as a group of 20,000 (at the time)
individual mappers. I'm
26 matches
Mail list logo
