Paul,
I hope your truck is recovered in good condition.
My perception of Amazon edits is overwhelmingly positive. I see the same
types of mistakes, but those mistakes are one the same level or less than
traditional craft mappers. On the plus side, they are neatly solving the
last mile
Yes, but I mean cases when it is obviously, from imagery and land use, a single
family house driveway.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Yes, but I mean cases when it is obviously, from imagery and land use, a single
family house driveway.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
When you aren’t sure of the exact nature of a service road it makes perfect
sense to leave out the service= tag. If that makes it more prominent it’s the
fault of the renderer.
--
Andrew
From: Greg Troxel
Sent: 22 March 2020 16:46
To: Dave F
Cc: Dave F via
Dave F writes:
> On 21/03/2020 20:59, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>
>> This really seems unfair.
>>
>> When someone maps for OSM because they want to, they have goals and a
>> typically a good attitude about community norms.
>>
>> When someone is a a paid mapper, their goals come from the person who is
Dave F writes:
> On 21/03/2020 20:59, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>
>> This really seems unfair.
>>
>> When someone maps for OSM because they want to, they have goals and a
>> typically a good attitude about community norms.
>>
>> When someone is a a paid mapper, their goals come from the person who is
On 21/03/2020 21:11, Paul Johnson wrote:
Anybody paid to contribute to OSM *must* be capable of setting
the example, as far as I'm concerned.
There appears to be some kind of snobbery infiltrating OSM. Very
disappointing.
DaveF
___
talk mailing
On 21/03/2020 20:59, Greg Troxel wrote:
This really seems unfair.
When someone maps for OSM because they want to, they have goals and a
typically a good attitude about community norms.
When someone is a a paid mapper, their goals come from the person who is
paying them, and they don't
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:59 PM Greg Troxel wrote:
> Dave F via talk writes:
>
> > In my area, AL are adding legitimate data which helps improve the
> > quality of the OSM database. I believe they make the same amount of
> > errors as any other contributors, including experienced ones.
> >
> >
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:59 PM Greg Troxel wrote:
> Dave F via talk writes:
>
> > In my area, AL are adding legitimate data which helps improve the
> > quality of the OSM database. I believe they make the same amount of
> > errors as any other contributors, including experienced ones.
> >
> >
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 9:36 AM Dave F wrote:
> In my area, AL are adding legitimate data which helps improve the quality
> of the OSM database. I believe they make the same amount of errors as any
> other contributors, including experienced ones.
>
> Unsure why he thinks OSMF should be keeping
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 9:36 AM Dave F wrote:
> In my area, AL are adding legitimate data which helps improve the quality
> of the OSM database. I believe they make the same amount of errors as any
> other contributors, including experienced ones.
>
> Unsure why he thinks OSMF should be keeping
Dave F via talk writes:
> In my area, AL are adding legitimate data which helps improve the
> quality of the OSM database. I believe they make the same amount of
> errors as any other contributors, including experienced ones.
>
> Unsure why he thinks OSMF should be keeping an eye on contributors
Dave F via talk writes:
> In my area, AL are adding legitimate data which helps improve the
> quality of the OSM database. I believe they make the same amount of
> errors as any other contributors, including experienced ones.
>
> Unsure why he thinks OSMF should be keeping an eye on contributors
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:37 AM Jmapb wrote:
> I try to keep an eye on them and fix the errors and the most egregious
> road geometry. When I leave changeset comments, they generally reply,
> but there are so many of them that it feels like trying to cook rice one
> grain at a time.
Very much
On 3/21/2020 10:37 AM, Dave F via talk wrote:
In my area, AL are adding legitimate data which helps improve the
quality of the OSM database. I believe they make the same amount of
errors as any other contributors, including experienced ones.
Unsure why he thinks OSMF should be keeping an eye on
In my area, AL are adding legitimate data which helps improve the
quality of the OSM database. I believe they make the same amount of
errors as any other contributors, including experienced ones.
Unsure why he thinks OSMF should be keeping an eye on contributors
purely because they're paid.
I
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 6:07 PM Paul Johnson wrote:
> 3) Amazon Logistics and a revolving door team of one-edit-and-done spam
> accounts keeps throwing paid contributions into Oklahoma that are of poorly
> aligned, largely fictional and low quality. I'm stuck cleaning up in a
> neglected part
So, you all know at this point that I've been heavily invested in editing
OSM and contributing to my maximum activity, less as a need to help a
charity and more of an obligation to the public to do the most good with
the short time I have on this planet. However, I've had a few events come
up
19 matches
Mail list logo
