see my previous email about the root certificate authority not being a
trusted source of issuing certificates. Your connection is still encrypted
like a self-signed certificate, but because the browser hasn't added the
root CA to their list of trusted CAs that comply with the practices/audits
it te
I also got an invalid cert.
It used to be the case that cacert was good because it was free. But
with LetsEncrypt giving free ssl certs, there's no excuse anymore.
On 07.04.2017 13:35, john whelan wrote:
Worksforme
Whether it works or not is not the point. It definitely shows an
invalid cert
>Worksforme
Whether it works or not is not the point. It definitely shows an invalid
certificate for me. This is simply poor security practise.
Cheerio John
On 7 April 2017 at 07:21, Éric Gillet wrote:
> 2017-04-07 12:11 GMT+02:00 David Earl :
>
>> The link https://pads.ccc.de/k4rlFOGIHb repo
it's because http://www.CAcert.org(CAcert Inc.) is not in the recognized
issuers of your browser. It's like having a self-signed certificate.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Éric Gillet
wrote:
> 2017-04-07 12:11 GMT+02:00 David Earl :
>
>> The link https://pads.ccc.de/k4rlFOGIHb reports an inval
2017-04-07 12:11 GMT+02:00 David Earl :
> The link https://pads.ccc.de/k4rlFOGIHb reports an invalid https
> certificate!
>
Worksforme
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
The link https://pads.ccc.de/k4rlFOGIHb reports an invalid https
certificate!
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 at 11:55 Christoph Hormann wrote:
> On Thursday 06 April 2017, Simon Poole wrote:
> >
> > The other issue is brain storming is nice and so on, but you are
> > going to disappoint a fair number of pe
On Thursday 06 April 2017, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> The other issue is brain storming is nice and so on, but you are
> going to disappoint a fair number of people if you don't scope it a
> bit, does "world peace" count as a worthy top 10 task? Or perhaps
> "turn osm.org in to a gmaps replacement"?
I
When you originally announced that the new group had formed and you had
simply for convinces sake used the existing EWG name, you specifically
scoped the "new EWG" differently than the "old EWG", now it seems as if
it is exactly the same.
The other issue is brain storming is nice and so on, but yo
Hi Ilya,
For the State of the Map, we're going to do a community survey for the
second time to help pick interesting sessions. If you wind up with much
more than ten tasks, I'm available to set up an open survey to help set
priorities. Just like in the State of the Map case, it could just be one o
Hi everyone,
Since 2008 we had a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Top_Ten_Tasks
wiki page which listed things new developers could work on, that would
improve OSM users experience. Things like OSM bugs (notes) integration,
an improved history tab and clickable points of interest. The list w
10 matches
Mail list logo