Re: [OSM-talk] There Is No Cabal

2009/3/4 Ulf Möller use...@ulfm.de: Frederik Ramm schrieb: then it emerges that this was an intentional change requested by the OSM Foundation. I haven't seen this emerging anywhere. (In fact, the OSM foundation, represented by their board of directors, seems to have been remarkably

[OSM-talk] There Is No Cabal

Richard Fairhurst schrieb: Far, far better that you speak up and post I'm worried about this because..., even in Schwabisch dialect if you like, than you sit there in silence thinking there's this conspiracy to make OSM commercial and I feel left out. After *three days* of analyzing the

Re: [OSM-talk] There Is No Cabal

Hi, Ulf Möller wrote: After *three days* of analyzing the licence text, people figure out that it doesn't actually require ShareAlike for commercial derived maps, I think we're seeing a slight problem with the wording here that has been overlooked, not a problem of the magnitude you

Re: [OSM-talk] There Is No Cabal

Frederik Ramm schrieb: then it emerges that this was an intentional change requested by the OSM Foundation. I haven't seen this emerging anywhere. (In fact, the OSM foundation, represented by their board of directors, seems to have been remarkably un-involved as we have heard from 80n