On 2015-09-01 13:14, Dave F. wrote:
That the icon is used purely as a place holder & *removed* when a
picture is added proves its irrelevance.
Why would a newbie care or even need to know the XML structure of the
database?
Why is that relevant?
The wiki has to be a clear & simple as possibl
On 01/09/15 12:14, Dave F. wrote:
> That the icon is used purely as a place holder & *removed* when a
> picture is added proves its irrelevance.
>
> Why would a newbie care or even need to know the XML structure of the
> database?
That there is a lot of material that is NOT rendered on the map is
That the icon is used purely as a place holder & *removed* when a
picture is added proves its irrelevance.
Why would a newbie care or even need to know the XML structure of the
database?
The wiki has to be a clear & simple as possible.
"I see that icon as an indication that the detail I'm lo
sent from a phone
> Am 30.08.2015 um 12:50 schrieb "ajt1...@gmail.com" :
>
> It's a wiki. If you think you can improve it, do so.
yes, it is a wiki, but I appreciate that he's asking here before making a
change that will affect many pages. Just because everybody has write access
does not m
On 30/08/15 13:02, Dave F. wrote:
> As it doesn't help anyone learn the basics of OSM, it has no purpose on
> a wiki & be removed.
The fact that there are now two identical icons is a little careless,
but that icon has a very valid place on both the original pages (
multiple languages ) that expla
I'd love to, but know I'd make a pigs ear of it. Unlike many people I'm
aware of my limitations.
Those limitations, however, are not valid reasons for keeping this icon.
As it doesn't help anyone learn the basics of OSM, it has no purpose on
a wiki & be removed.
Dave F.
On 30/08/2015 11:50,
On 30/08/2015 10:34, Dave F. wrote:
I'm looking for either a valid reason to keep it & if there is none,
remove it.
Poor/lazy wiki page design doesn't seem a valid one.
Neither is giving irrelevant, baffling info to newbies. We're meant to
be encouraging people to join in, not turn them a
On 27/08/2015 11:13, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2015-08-27 11:21, Dave F. wrote:
On 26/08/2015 21:54, Andrew Hain wrote:
Dave F. madasafish.com> writes:
Hi
Bearing in mind the wiki is used more often by new OSM
contributors &
therefore should be a clear & concise as possible, I'm curious why
On 2015-08-27 11:21, Dave F. wrote:
On 26/08/2015 21:54, Andrew Hain wrote:
Dave F. madasafish.com> writes:
Hi
Bearing in mind the wiki is used more often by new OSM
contributors &
therefore should be a clear & concise as possible, I'm curious why
this
icon is so
prevalent:
http://wiki
On 26/08/2015 21:54, Andrew Hain wrote:
Dave F. madasafish.com> writes:
Hi
Bearing in mind the wiki is used more often by new OSM
contributors &
therefore should be a clear & concise as possible, I'm curious why
this
icon is so
prevalent:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/thumb/5/5
Dave F. madasafish.com> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> Bearing in mind the wiki is used more often by new OSM
contributors &
> therefore should be a clear & concise as possible, I'm curious why
this
> icon is so
> prevalent:
>
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/thumb/5/5f/Osm_element_tag.sv
g/200p
Hi
Bearing in mind the wiki is used more often by new OSM contributors &
therefore should be a clear & concise as possible, I'm curious why this
icon is so prevalent:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/thumb/5/5f/Osm_element_tag.svg/200px-Osm_element_tag.svg.png
There's no description o
12 matches
Mail list logo