Here's another example where it fails to spider because it doesn't want to
cross, or even get close to, paved dips at intersection boundaries, no
doubt because it thinks they are sidewalks. That should probably be a
pattern it is sensitive to (roadColor-borderColor-roadColor) and allow it
to go
We
>> can modify the code to keep more significant digits if need be.
>>
>>
>>
>> J.M.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* christian.bro...@gmail.com [mailto:christian.bro...@gmail.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Chris Browet
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 14, 2
gt; Behalf Of *Chris Browet
> *Sent:* Monday, February 14, 2011 3:12 AM
> *To:* John-Michael Wiley
> *Cc:* talk@openstreetmap.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] magical road detector to play with
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:25, John-Michael Wiley
> wrote:
>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:25, John-Michael Wiley wrote:
> Not sure that was helpful.
>
> Anyway, I updated the staging servers with a new build that hopefully
> addresses the issues. Give it a try and let me know if you any issue.
>- modified osmchange to osmChange
>- removed the
At 2011-02-03 09:17, Steve Coast wrote:
http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2011/02/03/automatically-detect-roads-with-bing-aerial-imagery.aspx
This is something that has the potential to greatly increase mapping
productivity!
A couple of things:
1. When I run the sample
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:42 AM, David Murn wrote:
> A program that came out of Microsoft, trying to slightly modify a
> defacto file format standard, say it isnt so.
Dude. It's 2011. We've moved on. Let's stop attacking Microsoft
employees when they come here to do something helpful, because of
/
Thanks,
J.M.
-Original Message-
From: David Murn [mailto:da...@incanberra.com.au]
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 4:42 PM
To: Chris Browet
Cc: John-Michael Wiley; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] magical road detector to play with
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:52 +0100, Chris
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:52 +0100, Chris Browet wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 19:25, Chris Browet
> wrote:
> Busy implementing in Merkaartor
>
> A bug:
> you output while it is , with a capital
> "C". see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 19:25, Chris Browet wrote:
> Busy implementing in Merkaartor
>
> A bug:
> you output while it is , with a capital "C". see
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OsmChange
>
> - Chris -
And, AFAIK, below is not valid.
___
iley
> *Cc:* Chris Browet; talk@openstreetmap.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] magical road detector to play with
>
>
>
> Maybe put the magicshop version number in the creator?
>
> Steve
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:12 PM, John-Michael Wiley
> wrote:
>
>
>
Hello Serge,
I hope Richard convinced you that my intentions was purely to further
the debate and not to attack anyone. It is however not the point of
this email...
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> Nic, Richard has a long history with this community of being one of
> ou
On 4 February 2011 15:16, John-Michael Wiley wrote:
> The wiki page is not clear about what the version is supposed to be, is it
> for the version of OSM that output is written for or the version of the
> creator? I can do either, without much trouble.
I believe 0.6 is the expected value for vers
-Michael Wiley
Cc: Chris Browet; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] magical road detector to play with
Maybe put the magicshop version number in the creator?
Steve
On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:12 PM, John-Michael Wiley
mailto:jmwi...@microsoft.com>> wrote:
I made the changes, checked
.com] On Behalf
Of Chris Browet
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 1:55 AM
To: John-Michael Wiley
Cc: Steve Coast; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] magical road detector to play with
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 06:12, John-Michael Wiley
mailto:jmwi...@microsoft.com>> wrote:
I made th
Is there a minimum zoom requirement for the images?
I've tried it in Sao Miguel, Azores ( http:// www.openstreetmap.org/?
lat=37.7583&lon=-25.61075&zoom=17), where the bing imagery only goes to
level 17, and I keep getting a server exception.
Cheers,
João Carreiro
François Van Der Biest wrote:
I felt quite frustrated when I saw the silverlight stuff warning, so I
decided to create a simple client with OpenLayers.
Here it is: http://maps.qualitystreetmap.org/bingtracing/
Thank you - that let me try it !
In a few tests, I saw the tool prefer to route thr
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 06:12, John-Michael Wiley wrote:
>
>
> I made the changes, checked in the code and published them to the staging
> servers. If someone else wants to take a look at the output and let me know
> if you think. Unless I hear complaints I will update the production servers
> tomo
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:19:17 +0200
Nic Roets wrote:
> For example, when you spider the web and find references to
> 5, 20 and 48 Lion Street, Pretoria, then it may help the user who is
> mapping that street. Perhaps it's a cul de sac and now he doesn't need
> to travel all the way down it to see w
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: christian.bro...@gmail.com [mailto:christian.bro...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Chris Browet
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 6:4
.
From: christian.bro...@gmail.com [mailto:christian.bro...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Chris Browet
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 6:47 PM
To: John-Michael Wiley
Cc: Steve Coast; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] magical road detector to play with
I am also wondering if we should
> I am also wondering if we should switch to osm change as the enclosing tag
> although the idea is not to give someone something they submit right to OSM.
> In our prototypes we have been adding the detected ways onto the map for the
> user to edit and approve. I generate new id’s for the ones pas
r the ones passed back to me so they
don't conflict with current changes the user has already made.
Sincerely,
J.M. Wiley
From: Chris Browet [mailto:c...@semperpax.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 6:26 PM
To: Steve Coast
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] magical road d
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 03:25, Chris Browet wrote:
> Small details:
>
> in ""(just
> clicking "Go" on
> http://magicshop.cloudapp.net/Default.aspx)
>
> 1) "false" is misspelled to "flase"
> 2) Why "false" in the first place?
> 3) What/who/why is the uid mentioned?
> 4) same about version (hardcod
Small details:
in ""(just clicking "Go" on
http://magicshop.cloudapp.net/Default.aspx)
1) "false" is misspelled to "flase"
2) Why "false" in the first place?
3) What/who/why is the uid mentioned?
4) same about version (hardcoded to 5?)
It will be experimentally enabled in Merkaartor soon.
Regar
Thanks for the feedback. Eyal and jm any chance of confidence?
Steve
On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:10 PM, François Van Der Biest
wrote:
> Thanks for this new service.
>
> I felt quite frustrated when I saw the silverlight stuff warning, so I
> decided to create a simple client with OpenLayers.
> Here
Thanks for this new service.
I felt quite frustrated when I saw the silverlight stuff warning, so I
decided to create a simple client with OpenLayers.
Here it is: http://maps.qualitystreetmap.org/bingtracing/
I really like the whole idea, but the service lacks a confidence index
for the returned
That's an interesting idea, I wonder what else lurks on the web, like postcodes
for example?
Steve
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Nic Roets wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Another thing that Bing can help us with is determining address ranges
> of roads. For example, when you spider the web and find refere
Ah, we can continue our discussion elsewhere, preferably over a beverage.
If I could drag myself back to the topic, I might wonder aloud if this
technology could be used to add buildings for Project of the Month.
;-)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstree
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Nic Roets wrote:
>> "I only infringed a little bit" is still infringing.
>
> My understanding is that extracting a single fact from a single source
> is always legal (in the US, in the UK, everywhere).
Unfortunately in our case, the distinction between a single sm
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Nic Roets wrote:
>> A little bit of care will be needed to suppress databases that may be
>> legally protected. But I can't see any problem if you extract 1
>> address per website.
>
> I can see a problem with
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Nic Roets wrote:
> A little bit of care will be needed to suppress databases that may be
> legally protected. But I can't see any problem if you extract 1
> address per website.
I can see a problem with that idea.
"I only infringed a little bit" is still infringin
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Steve Coast wrote:
> http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2011/02/03/automatically-detect-roads-with-bing-aerial-imagery.aspx
That's really neat.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://li
Steve,
Another thing that Bing can help us with is determining address ranges
of roads. For example, when you spider the web and find references to
5, 20 and 48 Lion Street, Pretoria, then it may help the user who is
mapping that street. Perhaps it's a cul de sac and now he doesn't need
to travel
Stefan de Konink wrote:
After toying with markov models and viterbi for image tracing maybe we
could do the same for _all_ GPX tracks that OpenStreetMap has stored.
Or maybe just the not-too-noisy ones... But I guess that tracks that
jump too erratically around a mean vector can be filtered
Steve Coast wrote:
http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2011/02/03/automatically-detect-roads-with-bing-aerial-imagery.aspx
Very interesting. I wonder how it relates to the research I had cited at
http://www.mail-archive.com/talk@openstreetmap.org/msg25869.html - I'm
eager
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Steve Coast wrote:
http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2011/02/03/automatic
ally-detect-roads-with-bing-aerial-imagery.aspx
After toying with markov models and viterbi for image tracing maybe we
could do the same for _all_ GPX tracks that OpenStreetMap
On Thursday, 3 February 2011, Steve Coast wrote:
> http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2011/02/03/automatically-detect-roads-with-bing-aerial-imagery.aspx
Ooh! Just what I've always wanted.
[goes off to play with it]
Dermot
--
--
Igaühel
http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2011/02/03/automatic
ally-detect-roads-with-bing-aerial-imagery.aspx
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
38 matches
Mail list logo
