If you read the opendefinition
“A piece of content or data is open if anyone is free to use, reuse,
and redistribute it — subject only, at most, to the requirement to
attribute and/or share-alike.”
(here more details - http://opendefinition.org/okd/)
you can understand that the CC-NC, CC-ND and
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Pavel Melnikov positro...@gmail.com wrote:
My point was, I thought there are many more open licenses than listed in the
picture.
If the topic is the open data license the schema must be compliant with the
open definition where there are only two optional
I thank Maurizio for his precise answer. I quote it completely.
And thanks also for sharing Hatcher's schema. Very clear.
If you like to deepen the open database licensing topic, you can
also read my article:
- Italian version: Open licensing e banche dati (Informatica e
diritto, n. 1-2/2011);
-
(sorry, I forgot the links)
- Italian version: Open licensing e banche dati (Informatica e
diritto, n. 1-2/2011) - http://www.aliprandi.org/pub/aliprandi_ied_database.pdf
- English version: Open licensing and databases (International Free
and Open Source Software Law Review, Vol 4, No 2, 2011) -
I realized a diagram including all the most important opendata
licenses that are now available, and classifying them according to
their legal effects (attribution and share-alike, attribution only,
public domain). I hope this work can be useful to better understand
the actual situation of geodata
Forgive my incompetence, but what about other open licenses? Say,
CC-non-commercial, Cc-no-derivatives, and a whole bunch of combinations of
by, sa, nc, nd? Em you consider them not-open?
I'm sure there are more examples, I only know about cc ones.
On Sep 3, 2012 3:04 AM, Simone Aliprandi
://freedomdefined.org/Permissible_restrictions#Restrictions_which_are_no
t_permissible. CC doesn't claim that any NC or ND license is open either.
From: Pavel Melnikov [mailto:positro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 8:31 PM
To: Simone Aliprandi
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk
.
** **
*From:* Pavel Melnikov [mailto:positro...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, September 02, 2012 8:31 PM
*To:* Simone Aliprandi
*Cc:* talk@openstreetmap.org
*Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] opendata diagram
** **
Forgive my incompetence, but what about other open licenses? Say,
CC-non-commercial
On 03.09.2012 07:08, Pavel Melnikov wrote:
My point was, I thought there are many more open licenses than listed in
the picture.
Yet you did not give even one example.
Imo, since the diagram only claims to list the most important opendata
licenses, it does exactly what it says on the tin.
9 matches
Mail list logo
