Cartinus schrieb:
But when routing for
pedestrians, you will want to be able to reach the bus stops.
This and the rest is very valid reasoning. Therefore I also
convinced that bus_stops deserve a node besides the road.
--
Karl Eichwalder
___
graham wrote:
Steve Hill wrote:
How are people tagging bus stops? I have been setting tagging nodes that
are members of the way, which means they are part of the road they are on.
Is this the right way to do it? It seems right since it unambiguously
shows which road the stop is on, but
Lester Caine schreef:
graham wrote:
Steve Hill wrote:
How are people tagging bus stops? I have been setting tagging nodes that
are members of the way, which means they are part of the road they are on.
Is this the right way to do it? It seems right since it unambiguously
shows
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Niclas Andersson wrote:
I've always used a node in the way to represent a bus stop. This works
fine when there's a stop on each side of the road. Otherwise I've made
use of the bus_direction=(N|S|E|W) tag (from
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Buses ) on the node to
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Cartinus wrote:
Up till now I used the node in the road method. But lately I have been
thinking about how routing applications would use osm data. I doubt bus
companies will be using osm to route their busses. But when routing for
pedestrians, you will want to be able to
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Steve Hill wrote:
I think this is the one I was thinking of: http://www.transportdirect.info
No, sorry, it was probably http://www.traveline.org.uk/
- Steve
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/
Servatis a periculum, servatis
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a difficult problem - I can't think of any way to tell (from
existing data) whether a road is safe to cross without an explicit
pedestrian crossing. You can't just go on whether it is primary,
secondary, etc - there are
Nick wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a difficult problem - I can't think of any way to tell (from
existing data) whether a road is safe to cross without an explicit
pedestrian crossing. You can't just go on whether it is primary,
How are people tagging bus stops? I have been setting tagging nodes that
are members of the way, which means they are part of the road they are on.
Is this the right way to do it? It seems right since it unambiguously
shows which road the stop is on, but it doesn't allow any indication as to
/cartographers08/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Burgess
Sent: 06 April 2008 13:26
To: Steven te Brinke
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik: amenity=bus_station
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 13:38 +0200, Steven te Brinke wrote
Steve Hill wrote:
How are people tagging bus stops? I have been setting tagging nodes that
are members of the way, which means they are part of the road they are on.
Is this the right way to do it? It seems right since it unambiguously
shows which road the stop is on, but it doesn't allow
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, graham wrote:
I have mapped quite a few bus stops where the bus stop is on a pedestrian
island and I want to show not only 'side of road' but also a fairly exact
physical position. I'd be reluctant to give that up to plonk all my bus stops
in the middle of the road...
graham wrote:
I've been doing the opposite, and have only recently realised that your
way is the way I was supposed to do it..
I have mapped quite a few bus stops where the bus stop is on a
pedestrian island and I want to show not only 'side of road' but also a
fairly exact physical
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 14:53:40 graham wrote:
Steve Hill wrote:
How are people tagging bus stops? I have been setting tagging nodes that
are members of the way, which means they are part of the road they are
on. Is this the right way to do it? It seems right since it
unambiguously
Hi,
The current mapnik rules will render amenity=bus_stop, but the map
features define it as amenity=bus_station.
highway=bus_stop: A small bus stop. Larger stations should be tagged as
amenity=bus_station instead.
Best regards,
ce
___
talk
On Sunday 06 April 2008 12:38:59 Steven te Brinke wrote:
Hello,
The current mapnik rules will render amenity=bus_stop, but the map
features define it as amenity=bus_station.
Well, in my mind a bus stop and a bus station are different amenities. A bus
stop is just a place where the bus will
Matt Williams schrieb:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 12:38:59 Steven te Brinke wrote:
Hello,
The current mapnik rules will render amenity=bus_stop, but the map
features define it as amenity=bus_station.
Well, in my mind a bus stop and a bus station are different amenities. A bus
stop
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 13:38 +0200, Steven te Brinke wrote:
Hello,
The current mapnik rules will render amenity=bus_stop, but the map
features define it as amenity=bus_station.
Steven
I seem to remember that the rendering for amenity=bus_stop was put in
because it was in use prior to the
18 matches
Mail list logo
