(I suppose your reply was meant to t...@? If not, sorry for posting it)
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:32:06 +0100, Matt Williams wrote:
2009/8/24 David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:11:59 -0500, David Lynch wrote:
I suspect that I'd end up creating a set of ways that look
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:06 PM, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no physical barrier, and the lanes are divided by continuous lines
-- that would be a no-changing-lanes restriction, but I'd still be
uncomfortable with drawing two separate ways -- that doesn't reflect real
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:42:53 -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:06 PM, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no physical barrier, and the lanes are divided by continuous lines
-- that would be a no-changing-lanes restriction, but I'd still be
uncomfortable
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:11:59 -0500, David Lynch wrote:
I suspect that I'd end up creating a set of ways that look something
like this, plus a whole bunch of oneway tags and turn restrictions:
http://dl1050.dyndns.org:/images/osm/cfi.png
Wouldn't that make routers say turn left and at the
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:25, Konrad Skerikon...@skeri.com wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:11:59 -0500, David Lynch wrote:
I suspect that I'd end up creating a set of ways that look something
like this, plus a whole bunch of oneway tags and turn restrictions:
I suspect that I'd end up creating a set of ways that look something
like this, plus a whole bunch of oneway tags and turn restrictions:
http://dl1050.dyndns.org:/images/osm/cfi.png
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 17:33, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some issues with
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:11:59 -0500, David Lynch wrote:
I suspect that I'd end up creating a set of ways that look something
like this, plus a whole bunch of oneway tags and turn restrictions:
http://dl1050.dyndns.org:/images/osm/cfi.png
Thanks for the suggestion -- but I'd avoid drawing
7 matches
Mail list logo
