Tom Chance wrote:
If a pavement/sidewalk deviates significantly, just add a footway / cycleway
/
other way branching off from the main highway as appropriate. If the
pavement/sidewalk is really quite separate, as in your Milton Keynes example
(http://osm.org/go/eu4qDpI_3--) then by all
maning sambale wrote:
For example, I search a POI in G and it points me to an OSM node.
The simple answer has to be no. Unless the search engine finds links to follow
it's blind. It will not fill in search boxes just to see where it can get.
However if there are pages USING links to POI then a
Lester Caine wrote:
maning sambale wrote:
For example, I search a POI in G and it points me to an OSM node.
The simple answer has to be no.
But the complicated answer is yes: in that I am working on the
namefinder index to make it available through URLs (and a set of
gazetteer pages).
David Earl wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
maning sambale wrote:
For example, I search a POI in G and it points me to an OSM node.
The simple answer has to be no.
But the complicated answer is yes: in that I am working on the
namefinder index to make it available through URLs (and a set of
anyone got any ideas on tagging potential radioactive sites?
a search of the wiki produced nothing so far
*thinking*
radioactivity=yes
type=depleted_uranium
type=*
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:49:17 +0100, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
maning sambale wrote:
For example, I search a POI in G and it points me to an OSM node.
The simple answer has to be no.
But the complicated answer is yes: in that I am working
At 10:20 PM 7/08/2009, OJ W wrote:
sidewalks in villages - what to do?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.172898lon=-0.524788zoom=18
are they footpaths or are they road attributes?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Footway
A corollary but very important issue is
Lester Caine wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
maning sambale wrote:
For example, I search a POI in G and it points me to an OSM node.
The simple answer has to be no.
But the complicated answer is yes: in that I am working on the
namefinder index to make it available through
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:37 AM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
i.e. everything with a name (or other identifier like ref), which is all
the useful ones. (Of course we already have URLs by number for every
node, way and relation in the system, though those aren't usually
exposed
Nic Roets wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:37 AM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
mailto:da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
i.e. everything with a name (or other identifier like ref), which is all
the useful ones. (Of course we already have URLs by number for every
node,
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
In other words, at any node which is a junction of way
segments with different layers (whether the segments are part of the
same way or different ways), the physical implication is that the
slope of the way changes in
Sympathy from a pom! Deciduous and evergreen are orthogonal. Coniferous is
not even quite a sub-set of evergreen as there are a few deciduous conifers,
e.g. larch. So OSM to use evergreen vs. deciduous and show its innate
superiority to OS?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Liz
... In exchange for a German contribution to London, Coventry, Plymouth,
Liverpool ... ? Could we also put end_date= to the blame game and all learn
from the mistakes of the past? Some of us are old enough to have been there
at the time!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Laurence
If I understand rightly, this sounds like barrier=turnstile?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:delta_foxt...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 26 July 2009 16:16
To: osm-talk; vi...@thevikas.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] park barrier
--- On Sun, 26/7/09, ヴィカス ヤダワ (vikas yadav)
But is you use barrier=stile doesn't that imply that a pedestrian can (and
is intended to) climb over it? Whereas a turnstile is most often something
that you cannot climb over and access is usually (but perhaps not always)
subject to a coin- or car-in-the-slot payment or validation?
Mike Harris
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:15 AM, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
a previous poster (I've lost the thread as I'm using my webmail)
said that these could be assumed in residential areas.
While residents here would like concrete paths provided in residential
areas they are not standard by any means.
no, it's not, it's about relative order in the db.
Fair enough. In other words, at any node which is a junction of way
segments with different layers (whether the segments are part of the
same way or different ways), the physical implication is that the
slope of the way changes in the close
Create a web page for every suburb, village and
hamlet. Create a link to
the nearest city or town in bold (if there are
multiple cities at the
same distance, create multiple links. Find all the
streets that are
closest to this suburb and create links for each one.
The same goes
Hi all,
I want to point attention to the potlatch-funtion tidy-points (similar
to JOSM simplify way). I encourage everybody not to use these
functions (at least not on data someone else entered) as it harms
severly the data. IMHO OSM is a project about drawing a collaborative
map, not about
David Earl wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
maning sambale wrote:
For example, I search a POI in G and it points me to an OSM node.
The simple answer has to be no.
But the complicated answer is yes: in that I am working on the
namefinder index to make it
2009/8/8 Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) skipp...@gimnechiske.org:
Is that really information interesting to the main map? I would rather
think that such highly special information could be available as a
openlayer overlay from other/independent sources.
she was asking about tagging, not rendering.
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Giving a practical example of where currently pedestrian routing can't be
carried out ..
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.52986lon=-0.44605zoom=17layers=B000FTF
( I lived in Hewens Road many years ago so know that area )
There is a fence down the middle of the
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Austin Martinajmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, does OSM need a collective icon set, because by looking at this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features. It seems like just a random
mishmash of icons, but maybe I'm wrong on this.. However if I'm right, I
First of all welcome! Always good to see new members of our ever growing
community :)
If you want to buy a GPS you might want to go with a Garmin since then you can
use OSM maps, which is awesome. However there are people here that know a lot
more about GPSes, which to buy, which to avoid.
I tend to disagree - the purpose, design and access aspects of a turnstile are
normally very different from those of a stile. I think there is a good case for
barrier=turnstile - even, if like many other barrier tags, it is not yet
rendered. I do not regard a turnstile as a subtype of 'stile'.
Do not tag for the renderer! And I still don't think turnstile is in any way a
type of stile any more than a stile is a type of gate. In fact, to be
contentious, perhaps a turnstile is indeed a type of gate!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: John Smith
Hello, OJ, Roeland, all
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com wrote:
If you want to buy a GPS you might want to go with a Garmin since then you
can
use OSM maps, which is awesome. However there are people here that know a
lot
more about GPSes, which to buy, which
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
page of history EVEN WITH NO FOLLOW SET - having millions of indexed pages
does not necessarily increase presence, since they then ignore all the
duplication and treat it as attempts to distort the search results!
Not
I've noticed a lot of new data on Korea.
Who is working on Korea and is there a separate email list?
--
Jeffrey John Martin
dogs...@gmail.com
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
There
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Lized...@billiau.net wrote:
anyone got any ideas on tagging potential radioactive sites?
a search of the wiki produced nothing so far
How would we confirm potential radioactive sites? Is a
decommissioned power plant or quarry potentially more radioactive than
Hi,
Richard Weait wrote:
I'm inclined to think that _actual_ _radiation_ _measurements_ are
interesting for the database. Guesses and suppositions; much less
interesting.
Forgive my scientific ignorance, but are actual measurements even static
enough - I mean, if I measure radiation X at a
You cant confidently split trees into two groups, although Ordnance Survey
have tried to.
I believe in the future there will be a desire to give areas of woodland a
tag that describes the type of woodland. But there is not rush and
Evergreen, Deciduous and Mixed seem like a safe start
Jason
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Nic Roets wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
anyone got any ideas on tagging potential radioactive sites?
a search of the wiki produced nothing so far
*thinking*
radioactivity=yes
type=depleted_uranium
Hi Liz,
Many scientific
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Forgive my scientific ignorance, but are actual measurements even static
enough - I mean, if I measure radiation X at a certain place, is there
reason to believe that it will (in the absence of catastrophic events)
be more or less unchanged one month
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion about which automated functionalities
we want to allow
As long as the automated functionalities are initiated and
controlled by human judgment, there is no need to limit them.
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Roeland Douma wrote:
If you want to buy a GPS you might want to go with a Garmin since then you
can use OSM maps, which is awesome. However there are people here that know
a lot more about GPSes, which to buy, which to avoid. Also by searching on
the wiki you can find a
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 00:42:37 +0200 (CEST), Stefan de Konink
ste...@konink.de wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Forgive my scientific ignorance, but are actual measurements even static
enough - I mean, if I measure radiation X at a certain place, is there
reason to believe that
--- On Sat, 8/8/09, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
So if we take normal uranium it will only be alpha
radiation,
unless you eat, breath in dust etc. it is not harmful. (So
you know
exactly the reason why you shouldn't eat mushrooms in
East-Europe)
What about Uranium mining areas?
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 14:42:43 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I want to point attention to the potlatch-funtion tidy-points (similar
to JOSM simplify way). I encourage everybody not to use these
functions (at least not on data someone else entered) as it harms
I know that some people like this tidy-points-function to work on
TIGER-Data, but I tell you: if the TIGER-Data is not good/precise, it
won't get better using this function ;-)
bad data doesn't get worse either. for a lot of tiger data it can compact
without any loss. And tiger is not a
while the Garmin ones can use OSM maps, the chips they are still using is
not
the newest and best
so it is harder to get a fix
My newest logger can actually get a fix inside my house, which was
constructed
with a near complete Faraday cage design, although a fix takes much longer
than
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 03:38:48 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/8 David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com:
Inoltre, sarebbe carino inventarsi una relation per legare gli ingressi alle
biglietterie. Suggerimento:
type= ???
Ruolo shop → dove comprare i biglietti (uno o più)
Ruolo
Buongiorno a tutti.
Prima volta che scrivo qui, sono un nuovo arrivato nel progetto e ho
iniziato a mappare il mio comune (Orbassano, provincia di Torino) da
pochi giorni.
Volevo alcune delucidazioni, se c'è qualcuno che mi può chiarire un
problema: con l'utente Cervo,che è impegnato a mappare
2009/8/8 Maurizio Daniele maurizio.dani...@gmail.com:
Ovviamente non esiste nulla di fisico che ci dica qui passa il confine
amministrativo da poter mappare con un gps,
in realta` in teoria dovrebbero esistere dei cippi di confine anche
tra i comuni, la cui posizione potrebbe essere rilevata
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:14:40 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/8 David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com:
Io intendevo proprio qualcosa di specifico per legare biglietterie ed
ingressi :-)
Volendo, posso inventarmi i due ruoli tickets ed entrance ed usarli in
questa relazione... uhm.
IMHO no. Poi c'è anche la critica che si scrive palaeontoligical in
ingleterra. I tifo geological=palaeontological_site, ma concordo anche
su qualsiasi altro tag ;-)
ciao,
Martin
Ciao Martin,
ma diventa un po' piu lunga la cosa se inoltriamo una doppia richiesta?
ovvero una per
2009/8/8 marcellobil...@gmail marcello.bil...@gmail.com:
IMHO no. Poi c'è anche la critica che si scrive palaeontoligical in
ingleterra. I tifo geological=palaeontological_site, ma concordo anche
su qualsiasi altro tag ;-)
ciao,
Martin
Ciao Martin,
ma diventa un po' piu lunga la cosa se
2009/8/8 David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com:
Ecco:
type=site
site=archaeological_site
name=Sito Archeologico di Segesta
Membri (ruolo -- oggetto)
monument area/nodo
shop area/nodo
tickets area/nodo
entrance nodo
Cioè implementare ruoli specifici per
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
IMHO the solution is simple. Name it after what you are mapping.
For vehicles:
The route the cyclist follows is route=bicycle.
The route bus 5 follows is route=bus.
The route tram 13 follows is route=tram.
The route the
Hi Mike,
Thanks for bringing the OSMF perspective here.
I'm not experienced in these things, but I don't think membership fees would
be feasible as the main source of funding of OSMF in the long run with
respect to the technical operating costs (legal, administrative, etc. costs
are fine). As I
--- On Sat, 8/8/09, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
someone keeps on telling me not to tag for the renderer
The other reason they were elevated is due a lot of them being of regional
importance.
___
Talk-au mailing list
--- On Sat, 8/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
I'd
say that the best solution would be
tourism=picnic_site;shelter/cover/rainproof=yes. The reason
being that it's not just a shelter, it's a picnic
site which happens to be under cover.
I suggested:
Just noticed there is 3 or 4 suburbs near the Blacktown area that are marked
highway=road
http://maps.bigtincan.com/map.php?zoom=14lat=-33.74831lon=150.92984layers=B
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 08:42:56 + (GMT)
John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've been looking for some kind of simple search that can be added to the map
page, so far I haven't found anything open source or something I can easily
hack into a website so I've cooked up a proof of
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:53:41 +1000
Ashley Kyd a...@kyd.com.au wrote:
Hi all,
I was having a conversation the other day when the purpose of
amenity=shelter was brought into question.
http://barstool.ash.ms/photos/07082009-shelter.jpg
Above is a photo I took while out the other day. It's
I also started logging searches, that way common spelling mistakes can be dealt
with as well.
I'm also thinking if they don't supply the street type, it can go through half
a dozen or a dozen common street postfixes and see if anything matches that way
too.
Also I could probably make state
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 13:39:38 + (GMT)
John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
This case is an exception since there is a place=* node for Perth which is
marked as a capital city, does anyone know 2 towns or villiages or ... with
the same names in different states? or even same state I
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Evan Sebiree...@sebire.org wrote:
Bush walking paths should also be tagged as path not footway, except for
National parks were bicycles / horses are typically banned.
I think these should
That ain't going to happen - far too much effort involved to do that properly
everywhere on every shared path.
John
--- On Sat, 8/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
For width, use width=*.
___
Talk-au mailing list
When new to an area, what would lead me to take one path over several
alternatives.
I don't really want to ride them all before I know which one cyclists usually
use.
John
--- Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
highway=path; bicycle=designated; foot=yes.
Why isn't that a good idea? All
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:50 AM, j...@talk21.com wrote:
With all footpaths being shared paths here in the ACT, what makes a good
cycling path is sometimes difficult to pin down.
If the meaning of a tag is difficult to pin down, IMHO it is
probably not verifiable and therefore probably not a good
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:03 AM, j...@talk21.com wrote:
Think of the situation with roads, and the multitude of different tags
available to show how important the road is.
We only need two (or maybe three at most) to say whether a shared path is a
good cycling path. And then a few guidelines
At the moment I'm not trying to define anything. But a shared path that's
frequently used by cyclists means it's used as a cycleway.
And that';s worth knowing.
John
--- Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you suggesting that a cycleway should be defined as the path that cyclists
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, j...@talk21.com wrote:
At the moment I'm not trying to define anything. But a shared path that's
frequently used by cyclists means it's used as a cycleway.
And that';s worth knowing.
John
--- Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you suggesting that a
On 08/08/2009, at 11:58 PM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 13:39:38 + (GMT)
John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
This case is an exception since there is a place=* node for Perth
which is marked as a capital city, does anyone know 2 towns or
villiages or ... with the
--- On Sat, 8/8/09, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
I'm sure there are *lots* of places with the same name, a
couple more
I was hoping to make it easy for people so they don't need to enter the state,
but there isn't enough info in the OSM database to distinguish between them,
and
Sven Sommerkamp s_sommerk...@gmx.de [Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:00:59AM CEST]:
Am Freitag, 7. August 2009 01:09:41 schrieb Garry:
[...]
Seit hier so eine Kiste steht fahren die Leute sehr viel nervöser.
Es wäre wirklich mal interessant die Statistik zu lesen.
Ob an den Kreuzungen wo geblitzt
Am Samstag, 8. August 2009 08:06:47 schrieb Johannes Huesing:
Sven Sommerkamp s_sommerk...@gmx.de [Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:00:59AM
CEST]:
Am Freitag, 7. August 2009 01:09:41 schrieb Garry:
[...]
Seit hier so eine Kiste steht fahren die Leute sehr viel nervöser.
Es wäre wirklich mal
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 7. August 2009 00:24 schrieb Tirkon tirko...@yahoo.de:
Ich bin ja auch fuer gute Kommunikation und alles, aber so ein kleines
bisschen ist Information schon auch eine Holschuld - wir koennen leider
niemandem anbieten, dass er sich auf eine
Johannes Huesing johan...@huesing.name wrote:
Tirkon tirko...@yahoo.de [Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:26:29AM CEST]:
[...]
Die Mailingliste hier ist alles Andere als barrierefrei
Kannst Du mir sagen, welche Grundsätze der BITV durch die
Mailingliste verletzt werden?
Stephan o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
Tirkon wrote:
Während der Installation wurde erwähnt, es sei 6-14 installiert. Nach
dem Update auf 6-15 bleibt JOSM leider bunt und unbrauchbar, wie
zuvor.
klingt nach einem Problem mit der Ansteuerung der Grafikkarte. Treiber
der Grafikkarte aktuell?
so noch mal zurück zu diesem schon etwas angestaubten Thema.
In der Zwischenzeit gibt es ein Proposal für
natural=palaeontologic_site was meiner bescheidenen Meinung nach
besser passt als der ursprüngliche Vorschlag
historic=paleontologic_site.
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Eventuell kannst Du einige der Befehlszeilen-Parameter, die die
Graphikdarstellung von Java beeinflussen, aus diesem alten Posting von
Tobias Wendorff mal ausprobieren:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2008-August/018375.html
Ist zwar
Michael Kugelmann michaelk_...@gmx.de wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
zur openaerialmap gab es auf der SOTM einen Workshop (wie's mit dem
Projekt weitergeht) von Cristiano. Evtl. gibt da auch ein Video.
Nein, leider nicht: das Workshop-Room war ohne Video-Aufzeichnung (die
Berücksichtigung
wollte gerade - aus aktuellem Anlass - mal die U55 in Berlin auf der
ÖPNV-Karte anschauen.
Aber irgendwer oder irgendwas hat die Relationen alle gelöscht? Auf
jeden Fall stimmt da
irgendwas nicht:
http://www.öpnvkarte.de/?lat=52.51766lon=13.3757zoom=16layers=BT
vgl.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Achso, okay. Dann wirds das sein, ich hatte nicht die Muße, mir die Relationen
im Editor
anzuschauen.
Danke für die Info...
- - Fips
- --
Andreas Pothe schrieb:
wollte gerade - aus aktuellem Anlass - mal die U55 in Berlin auf der
ÖPNV-Karte
SB79 sb-lis...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
Sowas müsste auch die Mapper in den von _sightwalk abgedeckten Städten
erreichen. Doch außer Einträgen im OSM-Wiki wüßte ich auch nicht, wie
man gezielt Mapper in den entsprechenden Städten erreicht. Hat jemand
eine Idee? :-)
Ich habe es mal auf den
Hi,
mir ist in letzter Zeit aufgefallen, dass Wege (residentials, aber
sicher auch andere) doppelt übereinander liegen. Teilweise ganze
Straßenzüge...
Daher ein kleines Check Programm, das (für residentials) dies prüft:
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/gary68/waydupes.pl
Wiki
Habe gerade im Zeitungsladen des Vertrauens gesehen, dass das Magazin
PCgo 09/2009 mit einer kostenlosen Navi-Update für ganz Deutschland
wirbt. Natürlich ist OSM drin :-) Beim kurzen Überfliegen las ich,
dass eine Karte für Garmin angeboten wird, sowie eine kleine Anleitung
wie man diese ins
Am 8. August 2009 14:34 schrieb André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com:
... sowie eine kleine Anleitung, wie man diese ins
Garmin-Gerät
bringt.
confused 8-/
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Zunächst einmal vielen Dank für die ausführlichen Erklärungen :-)
SLXViper slxvi...@gmx.net wrote:
(Start-Ausführen-cmd.exe öffnen dann im Terminal (schwarzes
Fenster) diesen Befehl eingeben und Enter drücken). Das Ergebnis wäre
interessant.
Mit Deinen Erläuterungen habe ich es verstanden.
Am 8. August 2009 11:28 schrieb Olaf Kotzte olaf.kot...@gmx.net:
so noch mal zurück zu diesem schon etwas angestaubten Thema.
In der Zwischenzeit gibt es ein Proposal für
natural=palaeontologic_site was meiner bescheidenen Meinung nach
besser passt als der ursprüngliche Vorschlag
Am 8. August 2009 09:00 schrieb Sven Sommerkamp s_sommerk...@gmx.de:
Ich meinte eigentlich beides.
Argumentation die Überwachung durchzuführen ist die hohe
Unfallwahrscheinlichkeit.
Und gleichzeitig ist die Überwachung auch ein neuer Auslöser für Unfälle.
(Huch bin ich grad zu schnell,
Raimond Spekking raimond.spekk...@gmail.com wrote:
Das würde ich nicht so laut sagen ;-) Andrew arbeitet im Moment im
Auftrage der Wikimedia Foundation an der MediaWiki-Erweiterung
LiquidThreads. Diese soll die Diskussionsseiten in MediaWiki vereinfachen.
Das hört sich ja vielversprechend an.
Gary68 wrote:
mir ist in letzter Zeit aufgefallen, dass Wege (residentials, aber
sicher auch andere) doppelt übereinander liegen. Teilweise ganze
Straßenzüge...
ist mir auch schon aufgefallen. Hat oder hatte da mal ein Editor Probleme?
Was würde denn bei Netzwerkproblemen passieren wenn der
Tirkon wrote:
Zunächst einmal vielen Dank für die ausführlichen Erklärungen :-)
SLXViper slxvi...@gmx.net wrote:
(Start-Ausführen-cmd.exe öffnen dann im Terminal (schwarzes
Fenster) diesen Befehl eingeben und Enter drücken). Das Ergebnis wäre
interessant.
Mit Deinen Erläuterungen habe
Hi Gary,
Gary68 schrieb, am 08.08.2009 14:15 Uhr:
mir ist in letzter Zeit aufgefallen, dass Wege (residentials, aber
sicher auch andere) doppelt übereinander liegen. Teilweise ganze
Straßenzüge...
das ist mir auch in letzter Zeit häufiger auch schon bei schon länger
existierenden
Hi!
Auf openstreetmap.de werden schon seit längerem die lokalen Gruppen aufgelistet
und sie können auch auf der Karte angezeigt werden. Das ging bisher immer
komplett manuell und war daher umständlich und schwer aktuell zu halten.
Ich habe das jetzt etwas automatischer gestaltet: Es gibt im Wiki
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Tirkon wrote:
Wenn sich JOSM öffnet, dann wird beim Durchlesen des Startbildschirms
als erstes empfohlen, diese beiden Seiten anzuschauen
Wo wird das? Die Hinweise mit den Zahlen sind doch recht eindeutig
Neuigkeiten (immerhin steht ganz am Ende der Liste auch weitere
Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de wrote:
Für Beginner gibt es sogar einen eigenen Punkt und auch auf die
Hilfe-Seiten wird verlinkt. Du kannst nicht erwarten, dass die gesamte
Seite den Einsteigern gewidmet wird, immerhin sieht jeder Nutzer diese
Seite jedesmal. Deswegen ist der obere
SteMo schrieb:
Hi Gary,
Gary68 schrieb, am 08.08.2009 14:15 Uhr:
mir ist in letzter Zeit aufgefallen, dass Wege (residentials, aber
sicher auch andere) doppelt übereinander liegen. Teilweise ganze
Straßenzüge...
das ist mir auch in letzter Zeit häufiger auch schon bei schon länger
Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de wrote:
Wenn alles klappt verhält sich JOSM wie jedes andere Programm auch. Wenn
nicht, dann fängt die Fehlersuche an. Da hören Kommandozeilenargumente
dazu. Dass ist aber bei anderen Programmen genauso.
Leider hat die Windows-Monotonie dazu geführt, dass
Jochen Topf schrieb:
Hi!
Auf openstreetmap.de werden schon seit längerem die lokalen Gruppen
aufgelistet
und sie können auch auf der Karte angezeigt werden. Das ging bisher immer
komplett manuell und war daher umständlich und schwer aktuell zu halten.
Wo findet man denn die
Hallo,
darf man Radwege und Knotenpunkte aus dem Radroutenplaner NRW in OSM
übernehmen?
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Wolfgang Wienke
___
Talk-de mailing list
Wolfgang Wienke schrieb:
Hallo,
darf man Radwege und Knotenpunkte aus dem Radroutenplaner NRW in OSM
übernehmen?
Ich würde jetzt mal ganz spontan NEIN sagen. Gibt es denn in den
Nutzungsbedingungen irgend eine Passage die dich zu dieser Frage bewegt hat?
André
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Alle Seiten, die dieses Template benutzen, werden auch automatisch in die
Kategorie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Lokale_Gruppe
eingetragen.
Die Funktionalität überschneidet sich etwas mit dem Template
Tirkon tirko...@yahoo.de [Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 10:14:20AM CEST]:
[...]
Da liegt ein Mißverständnis vor. Das barrierefrei bezog sich auf die
notwendigen technischen Kenntnisse zum Zugang auf Mailinglisten, was
aus dem Kontest des oben Zitierten hervorgegangen sein dürfte.
Nun, barrierefrei ist
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 05:59:54PM +0200, André Reichelt wrote:
Jochen Topf schrieb:
Hi!
Auf openstreetmap.de werden schon seit längerem die lokalen Gruppen
aufgelistet
und sie können auch auf der Karte angezeigt werden. Das ging bisher immer
komplett manuell und war daher
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 07:17:26PM +0200, Tirkon wrote:
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Alle Seiten, die dieses Template benutzen, werden auch automatisch in die
Kategorie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Lokale_Gruppe
eingetragen.
Die Funktionalität überschneidet sich
Tirkon schrieb:
Raimond Spekking raimond.spekk...@gmail.com wrote:
Das hört sich ja vielversprechend an. :-) Siehst Du attraktive
Features, welche die Nutzer der Mailinglisten auf die
Diskussionsseiten des Wiki locken könnte?
Abwarten, das mag ich noch nicht beurteilen. Erstmal muss das
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
