On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Rory McCann wrote:
> Great to see people using the BBB server. We didn't ask to delete
> anything, the video is still there (I sent you the link off-list). When you
> view the Room in BBB, you should see “Room Recordings” underneath, which
> should have the
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, at 8:21 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Can you confirm that we can leave the recordings on the server and are
> able to link to the recordings for other sites, like the wiki?
No, you can't rely on it like that. We only have limited storage space. Alas,
we cannot offer a video
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:41 PM Rory McCann wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, at 8:21 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
> > Can you confirm that we can leave the recordings on the server and are
> > able to link to the recordings for other sites, like the wiki?
>
> No, you can't rely on it like that. We only
Thanks for the responses! I wasn't going to rely on BBB for long term availability, which is why I wanted to download the video. I use archive.org to make the videos available longer term.MartijnOn Sep 17, 2020 12:38, Rory McCann wrote:On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, at 8:21 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Can
Hi Martijn,
Great to see people using the BBB server. We didn't ask to delete anything, the
video is still there (I sent you the link off-list). When you view the Room in
BBB, you should see “Room Recordings” underneath, which should have the
recordings, do you see that? Then click on
Servus,
Gibt es eigentlich einen Grund warum in den JOSM image presets für das
basemap.at Orthofoto nur die maximale Zoomstufe 19 eingestellt ist? [1]
In Städten sind die Orthofotos bis Zoomstufe 20 verfügbar. [2]
lg, Florian (Woazboat)
[1]
I was able to download the video(s). There's actually two of them, a separate
video for the screenshare and one for the webcam which has the audio. In order
for me to upload these as one integrated video to archive.org, I will need to
post-process the video, mixing the sound and webcam stream
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 20:07, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> >
> > 1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a reference,
> > the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be more specific
> > then ref:psma or something like that
Bonjour Yves,
Sur certaines fontaines, les popup fonctionnent - d'autres non .. Les
modals correspondent plutôt aux parcs où se trouve la fontaine que la
fontaine elle-même. Est-ce que la licence sur les popups concerne toutes
les données sur la carte ? Il me semble ambigu.
Aussi, je n'ai
Hey,
Editam prin Tecuci și am văzut că e considerat „town”, deși el e
municipiu. A fost o discuție scurtă pe Telegram acum ceva timp despre
asta, dar s-a ajuns la concluzia că nu foarte multă lume e acolo și că
mai bine să ridice cineva problema aici.
Ideea e că municipiile din România ar
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 19:08, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpostal_code indicates
> post code areas should be type=boundary + boundary=postal_code +
> postal_code=* on a relation or way. Given we don't have a good open data
> set for postal code
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpostal_code indicates
post code areas should be type=boundary + boundary=postal_code +
postal_code=* on a relation or way. Given we don't have a good open data
set for postal code boundaries, it's hard to map these anyway. They
probably don't need
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 07:41, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> I think the other two we have 6 for LGA and 10 for Suburb/Localities are
>> well used already and reasonable and what's being proposed for the PSMA
>> import.
>>
>
> So the admin level table shows 10 as "Locality Border (Suburbs or
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 13:29, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
>> That part I'm not sure what the original intent was or what it means.
> Which ABS boundary, why are statistical boundaries even relevant here.
>
Could be wiped off the list & left as another "Not in Use" then?
If there's a case for
14 matches
Mail list logo
