[talk-au] Qld topo map usable?

G'day all I've just come across an online Qld topo map, published by Dept of Natural Resources. Map is at http://qtopo.dnrm.qld.gov.au/Mobile/ Also makes reference to copyright being licensed under CC BY 4.0: https://www.dnrm.qld.gov.au/legal/copyright, & includes "Under this licence you are

Re: [OSM-talk] Adding wikidata tags to the remaining objects with only wikipedia tag

Verifiability is critical to OSM success, but it does not mean it must only be verifiable by visiting the physical location. Tags like "wikipedia", "wikidata", "url", "website" and some IDs cannot be verified that way. You must visit some external website to validate. Stopping by Yellowstone

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] DIT study of Balbriggan

Hi, Over time, Stabilo_boss, others and I have added a fair bit of detail to Balbriggan, such that the map there is generally in a better condition than the surrounding towns, the big difference being that the the other towns generally have a higher percentage (but still low) of individual

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] DIT study of Balbriggan

DIT Study of Balbriggan Thanks for the suggestions Donal, Ruairi and Dave, these give me a few things to explore with the class and teachers. On using HOTOSM, generally you need some sort of humanitarian/environmental call to action that is urgent and I don't think Balbriggan has that. Mapcraft

Re: [OSM-talk] All the subway systems in the world

W dniu 30.09.2017 o 18:35, Ilya Zverev pisze: usable, I've compiled a list of practices on this page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Metro_Mapping Some questions are answered on the Talk page there. Next week I'll open a voting, so that tagging schema could be made

Re: [Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

On Sep 24, 2017 8:33 AM, "Greg Troxel" wrote: Adam Franco writes: > One additional note is that at least in my area, the TIGER import > incorrectly added access=private to many driveways and privately maintained > residential roads. Upon surveying these

Re: [Talk-at] Wochennotiz Nr. 374 12.09.2017–18.09.2017

Hallo Manfred, Manfred Brandl schrieb: > Ich habe die Wochennotiz Nr. 375 nicht per Email bekommen, bisher war das > ausgenommen Nr. 368 sehr zuverlässig. Wurde die Notiz nicht verschickt oder > gab es auf meiner Seite ein Empfangsproblem? ohne das jetzt größer auszuführen: Durch interne

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

>One more thing to know about GNIS: entries are never deleted. One minor exception to this is if they determine that a given feature has 2 IDs, one of the IDs will often be removed. Max ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] All the subway systems in the world

Nice! I like the detail you guys are applying. Keep up the good work! 2017-09-30 18:35 GMT+02:00 Ilya Zverev : > Hi, > > I have made a script that parses and validates subway systems. It prints the > number of subway lines and stations that an automated system can extract from

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

I sense a topic for the next Many Mappy Minutes or a BOF at State of the Map US —> cleaning up old imports. I sure appreciate all the knowledge shared here! So much I didn’t know about GNIS data. Martijn > On Sep 30, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Wolfgang Zenker > wrote: > >

Re: [OSM-talk] All the subway systems in the world

Cool stuff. I was clicking around and the link to the github repo is either dead or to a private repo. Not sure if this was intentional? \FredrikLindseth On 30. sep. 2017 19:06, Ilya Zverev wrote: My definition of a subway is a network of lines that are marked "subway" on official subway

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

Hello, Le 30. 09. 17 à 18:36, joost schouppe a écrit : > I think everyone agreed that this is nothing more than "maquillage" not me, not always :) > https://www.google.be/maps/@50.8674422,4.3297542,3a,60y,141.06h,86.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1srWr6HwmC8P9LgEfOSk2Xpg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 this traffic

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

* Carl Anderson [170930 17:21]: > ​A little history on GNIS data, and the Board of Geographic Names. > The US Board of Geographic Names manages names for places and features > shown on US govt maps. They have been using a database to manage the names > across maps and

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

I also seem to have observed that, at least in rural New Mexico where I do most of my mapping, GNIS features like historic places seem to have only been entered to the resolution of what town they were in, and then all ended up at something like the centroid of the town or county limits. The

Re: [OSM-talk] All the subway systems in the world

My definition of a subway is a network of lines that are marked "subway" on official subway maps. Though validator also processes light rail lines (with obviously similar definition). Ilya > 30 сент. 2017 г., в 19:59, john whelan написал(а): > > Silly question but

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:11:06 +0700 Dave Swarthout wrote: > "Second, many entries have their coordinates specified using the old > NAD 27 datum, but somewhere along the line, that fact was lost and the > coordinates were assumed to be in either NAD 83 or WGS 84. This >

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

Ciao, 2017-09-30 17:52 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > sent from a phone > > > On 30. Sep 2017, at 11:02, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > > > civici associati a un edificio mentre in Italia sono sempre associati a > un'entrata > > > non è

Re: [OSM-talk] All the subway systems in the world

Silly question but what is your definition of a subway? Is it different to commuter rail? Thanks John On 30 Sep 2017 12:38 pm, "Ilya Zverev" wrote: > Hi, > > I have made a script that parses and validates subway systems. It prints > the number of subway lines and stations

hebdoOSM Nº 375 2017-09-19-2017-09-25

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 375 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/9500/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-talk] All the subway systems in the world

Ilya ha pubblicato i risultati di un nuovo sistema per verificare le metro del mondo in osm. Questo è il link per lItalia: http://osmz.ru/subways/italy.html Ciao, Martin sent from a phone Begin forwarded message: > From: Ilya Zverev > Date: 30. September 2017 at 18:35:18

hebdoOSM Nº 375 2017-09-19-2017-09-25

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 375 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/9500/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

hebdoOSM Nº 375 2017-09-19-2017-09-25

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 375 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/9500/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

hebdoOSM Nº 375 2017-09-19-2017-09-25

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 375 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/9500/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[OSM-talk] All the subway systems in the world

Hi, I have made a script that parses and validates subway systems. It prints the number of subway lines and stations that an automated system can extract from the OpenStreetMap data. See the latest report here (these are updated manually for now): http://osmz.ru/subways/ It is still in beta:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

We also discussed this quite extensively on Riot. I think everyone agreed that this is nothing more than "maquillage", but that the proper tag for this maquillage is in fact shared_lane. > Jo: we could use shared_lane, but then we either have to do that on all highways where bicycles aren't

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

sent from a phone > On 30. Sep 2017, at 11:02, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > civici associati a un edificio mentre in Italia sono sempre associati a > un'entrata non è necessariamente un errore. È vero che ogni ingresso dovrebbe avere un civico, ma quando non c’è più di

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

On 9/29/2017 11:06 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Mark Bradley > wrote: In the course of my mapping in the American Midwest, I have come across several small country churches of GNIS origin that

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

On 30-09-17 08:13, Jo wrote: > True, we could use shared_lane, but then we either have to do that on > all highways where bicycles aren't banned, or we go on with that as the > de facto standard. > > The fact that a bicycle is drawn, doesn't make it 'more' of a shared > lane than it would be

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

On 9/30/2017 3:19 AM, Mark Wagner wrote: Second, many entries have their coordinates specified using the old NAD 27 datum, but somewhere along the line, that fact was lost and the coordinates were assumed to be in either NAD 83 or WGS 84. This results in an offset that increases the further you

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

Benvenuto Daniele e complimenti per la proposta di importare i numeri civici Il 29 Set 2017 16:46, "Maurizio Napolitano" ha scritto: Come Daniele ha già spiegato il Comune di Trento georefernzia ogni etichetta che rappresenta un numero civico. Questo fa sì che una

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Importation des hauteurs de bâtiments sur Nice

Le 27 septembre 2017 à 23:25, Philippe Verdy a écrit : > Un problème entre Cantaron et Falicon, le MNT ne semble pas correct (plat > là où il y a des montagnes) du coup, on a des tas de "tours": > Pour info j'ai corrigé cette zone, merci pour le report. A priori c'était la

Re: [Talk-it] Task incompleto, da me bloccato.

Il 29/09/2017 21:40, Alessandro Palmas ha scritto: > > Il tsk è stato terminato. > > Sbiribizio ha dato una mano al server a tirarsi su. > > Ok, grazie, comunque per il quadrato in questione quando saranno sul posto verificheranno meglio. Grazie ancora. -- Simone Girardelli

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

It definitely is not always permitted to ride a bicycle against the flow of traffic on oneway streets. The law was changed at some point to allow administrations to create oneway streets where bicycles are allowed in both directions, but it's not for all oneway strees. Jo 2017-09-30 11:56

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

> Another point is that if you have the outline for something that GNIS shows > as a node, please conflate! I've done that with a lot of buildings and parks > locally - just copy-and-paste the GNIS tags from the node to the polygon and > then delete the node. The utilsplugin2 [1] for JOSM and

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

I thought was always allowed to drive in the opposite direction under Belgian law. What does not mean that a sign to remind car drivers is welcome. m. On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 9:19 AM, marc marc wrote: > Hello, > > Le 29. 09. 17 à 22:42, eMerzh a écrit : >>

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Centre commercial déplacé

Bonjour, > Ok. Du coup, le plus simple est d'utiliser les imageries Cadastre pour > les bâtiments et BDOrtho IGN pour le reste visible du ciel. > C'est ce que je viens de faire (j'avais trop envie, c'est une vraie > drogue ce projet !). ;-) Super ! Merci. Librement. -- Lionel Allorge April :

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

Ciao, 2017-09-30 0:40 GMT+02:00 Maurizio Napolitano : > > La pagina wiki deve essere in inglese perché poi deve essere commentata > > nella ML di import e il parere della ML di import è vincolante. > > Certo. > Per la discussione in italiano però è meglio l'italiano :) > In

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

"Second, many entries have their coordinates specified using the old NAD 27 datum, but somewhere along the line, that fact was lost and the coordinates were assumed to be in either NAD 83 or WGS 84. This results in an offset that increases the further you go from central Indiana; the offset in

Re: [Talk-at] Wochennotiz Nr. 374 12.09.2017–18.09.2017

Hallo liebes Wochennotizteam! Ich habe die Wochennotiz Nr. 375 nicht per Email bekommen, bisher war das ausgenommen Nr. 368 sehr zuverlässig. Wurde die Notiz nicht verschickt oder gab es auf meiner Seite ein Empfangsproblem? Viele Grüße Manfred Brandl Sent mobile. Am 22.09.2017 um 00:16

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Talk-be Digest, Vol 117, Issue 6

Ik rij toch liever met de velo door een straat waar de plaats van de velo in herinnering gebracht wordt voor de automobilist dan door een straat zonder dat. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 06:56:31 +0700 Dave Swarthout wrote: > Glad you mentioned that GNIS import, Ian. > > This isn't a pressing issue but I've been doing considerable mapping > in Alaska and encounter GNIS features constantly. Many of them are > nodes and refer to mines,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

Hello, Le 29. 09. 17 à 22:42, eMerzh a écrit : > https://www.google.be/maps/@50.8674422,4.3297542,3a,60y,141.06h,86.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1srWr6HwmC8P9LgEfOSk2Xpg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 imho the bike painted in the opposite direction to what appears to be a one-way street is intended to warn that

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

True, we could use shared_lane, but then we either have to do that on all highways where bicycles aren't banned, or we go on with that as the de facto standard. The fact that a bicycle is drawn, doesn't make it 'more' of a shared lane than it would be without the wasted paint. All it does is

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

cycleway=shared_lane https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Shared_cycle_lanes note that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shared_lane says nothing about any required legal status. m. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:42 PM, eMerzh wrote: > hi, > > i