[talk-au] VIC addresses import (was Re: How to efficiently improve AU address coverage?)

On Tue 2023-10-03 14:27:28 +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 23:48, Yuchen Pei wrote: > On Mon 2023-10-02 21:42:01 +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > [... 15 lines elided] > > It's been a while since I worked on this, but I believe it was > the > > matching

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Absence de crédit

Le 05/10/2023 à 15:48, Vincent Bergeot a écrit : Le 05/10/2023 à 14:22, Yannick a écrit : Le 05/10/2023 à 13:57, Yannick a écrit : Bonjour, Je viens de signaler,2-3 jours, l'absence d'attribution sur cette page https://www.sglb.org/page/2104577-8e-forum-de-genealogie-rhone-alpes La remarque

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 06/10/2023 14:23, Martin Trautmann wrote: On 23-10-06 14:24, Tom Hughes wrote: Maybe it would be easy to avoid and maybe it wouldn't but until we know what the actual problem is we can't tell and none of the developers are likely to have such an old browser to reproduce it even if they

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 23-10-06 14:24, Tom Hughes wrote: Maybe it would be easy to avoid and maybe it wouldn't but until we know what the actual problem is we can't tell and none of the developers are likely to have such an old browser to reproduce it even if they wanted to so unless you can provide more details

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 06/10/2023 12:53, Martin Trautmann wrote: On 23-10-06 13:41, Tom Hughes wrote: On 06/10/2023 12:12, Martin Trautmann wrote: On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote: No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last security patches. To answer the original question there have

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 23-10-06 13:41, Tom Hughes wrote: On 06/10/2023 12:12, Martin Trautmann wrote: On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote: No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last security patches. To answer the original question there have been any deliberate changes that I know but

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 06/10/2023 12:12, Martin Trautmann wrote: On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote: No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last security patches. To answer the original question there have been any deliberate changes that I know but given the error it's entirely possible

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

This is not OSM's problem to solve. Ancient web browser slowly becomes unusable = expected behavior. On Fri, Oct 6, 2023, 7:26 AM Martin Trautmann wrote: > On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote: > > No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last > > security patches. > > > >

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote: No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last security patches. To answer the original question there have been any deliberate changes that I know but given the error it's entirely possible that FF has fixed something in what CSP rules

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 23-10-06 12:34, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: Firefox 78 EST has reached end of life over year ago, see https://endoflife.date/firefox It was released in October 2021. I would strongly encourage to update it for security reasons. I know - but there is

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last security patches. To answer the original question there have been any deliberate changes that I know but given the error it's entirely possible that FF has fixed something in what CSP rules it checks for what requests. I don't see that

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

Firefox 78 EST has reached end of life over year ago, see https://endoflife.date/firefox It was released in October 2021. I would strongly encourage to update it for security reasons. And would not be surprised if random things are breaking. Oct 6, 2023, 11:54 by tr...@gmx.de: > Have there

[OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

Have there been any changes for a minimum software version to use the openstreetmap editor? I can still browse with my old firefox version 78.15.0esr, but when I try to edit anything, the editor's area remains empty. Inspecting the pages names "The page’s settings blocked the loading of a

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Classifying settlements (Was Re: Filling in blank space (Was Re: Tagging towns by relative importance, not just population size))

Thanks Graeme, it’ll be great to hear what others think too. Cheers Ian ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Classifying settlements (Was Re: Filling in blank space (Was Re: Tagging towns by relative importance, not just population size))

On 6/10/23 14:08, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: Thanks Ian & Steve Looking at the numbers from a Qld perspective, I'd go inbetween the two samples! e.g. Hamlet <250 Village 250-1000 Town 1000-15000 City 15000< Which would produce https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Bup It also becomes obvious that