too large a scale for gaining a quick overview
of an area, and 1:50k often miss detail which is important for
navigation. However, we still lack easy to use render chains designed
for print.
Jerry
On 26 April 2017 at 12:53, Marco Boeringa <ma...@boeringa.demon.nl
<mailto:ma...@boeringa.dem
A bit off topic I admit, but I just received my first two OS UK custom
maps, with my own chosen print extent. I love it!
Being custom digital print, the quality does not fully hold up with my
1990's era "Snowdon & surrounding area" offset version, but it is still
entirely acceptable, and it
ael,
"but your habit of not commenting on most of your changesets did
contribute to people's suspicion. I really would urge you to make some
sort of comment, even if brief, and maybe repetitive where you are doing
similar things."
Yes, this was part of my confusion. I saw at least three
Hi all,
Since there was no more real discussion, I have decided to also revert
the other two changesets. This means all the heath should re-appear on
the map as it used to be before, except for the single edit by Brian
based on his local knowledge of Snowdonia.
I think the suggestion by one
Hi all,
Dyserth contacted me through a changeset comment about the changes I
made and explaining his point of view. I have henceforth decided to
revert the changes I made involving his edits. I have also invited him
to join the Talk-GB discussion.
I have not yet reverted the other changes,
Hi all,
Following Brian's example, and "playing the ball" as Warin pointed out,
I have now taken some action.
To document what I have done:
1) I first selected all features tagged as "natural=heath" using
Overpass Turbo in an area roughly the extent of Wales (but actually
larger as the
Andy, so what is your suggestion right now, do this manually or with
automated tools? Personally, I only did a few reverts using the JOSM
plugin, only reverting an entire changeset, not selectively as you seem
to suggest here. I have no experience with the other tools you mention.
Would the
Hi all,
I now had a very preliminary and short look at some of the changesets
involved in the Wales area, which was revealing. I now noticed most of
these features seem to have been added by multiple users / accounts:
- Sam888, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413378224
- Glucosamine:
iscussions.
Regards
Brian
On 8 February 2017 at 10:37, Marco Boeringa <ma...@boeringa.demon.nl
<mailto:ma...@boeringa.demon.nl>> wrote:
Hi David,
I know the opinions about the need to create multipolygons are as
diverse as there are political opinions. It was just
with these
features, or if there is any consensus whether they are desired or not.
If not, would the community oppose someone else removing them?
Marco
On 07/02/17 19:19, Marco Boeringa wrote:
> Lastly, the lack of proper multipolygon creation, means that other types
> of renderers and styles than
Hi all,
I noticed that in Wales, large parts of the Snowdonia National Park have
been covered with natural=heath, much of which seems blatantly
incorrect. Although I am from the Netherlands, having studied for half a
year in Bangor in 1993, I know the area around Snowdon mountain and
Martin,
I have now added a type=building relation to group the Pantheon's Simple
3D features in a logical way. It is this relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6325840.
I added the "outline" role to the multipolygon representing the
building's footprint, and added the "part" role
I agree there are currently issues. It is an unstoppable trend, but it
would be good if there was better support and enforcing of "best
practices" so as to avoid loosing the ability to create proper 2D maps
in a quest to map every detail of 3D (or for that matter Indoor) buildings.
One thing
13 matches
Mail list logo
