Am Mo., 4. Nov. 2019 um 12:16 Uhr schrieb James :
> Conspiracy: tagging a grassy knoll "the place JFK was shot from"
>
> Nitpicking: You rounded off the 16th decimal on a city's name tag, losing
> a maximum on 10cm of precisionon...a...city...nametag.
>
>
"nitpicking" and "no conspiracy
On Monday 04 November 2019, James wrote:
> Conspiracy: tagging a grassy knoll "the place JFK was shot from"
>
> Nitpicking: You rounded off the 16th decimal on a city's name tag,
> losing a maximum on 10cm of precisionon...a...city...nametag.
Conspiracy: tagging a grassy knoll "the place JFK was shot from"
Nitpicking: You rounded off the 16th decimal on a city's name tag, losing a
maximum on 10cm of precisionon...a...city...nametag.
On Mon., Nov. 4, 2019, 4:56 a.m. Martin Koppenhoefer, <
dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
I've read this several times in different occasions, but I never understood
the "no conspiracy theory" clause. Who decides what a conspiracy theory is,
and what a conspiracy? Wouldn't it be a perfect means to silence criticism,
if one wanted, to declare any critique a "conspiracy theory"?
4 matches
Mail list logo
