Minh Nguyen writes:
> For what it's worth, the argument about transparency would probably be
> more effective if it were actually an upfront expectation that applies
> to everyone. As it is, anyone could simply set source=survey or
> local_knowledge on their changeset and call it a day.
>
>
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 9:00 PM Minh Nguyen
wrote:
> Vào lúc 07:11 2022-10-30, Greg Troxel đã viết:
> > But then the company doing the editing should document which company's
> > imagery and which revision year they are using. Things should be as
> > transparent as possible, and this doesn't
Vào lúc 07:11 2022-10-30, Greg Troxel đã viết:
But then the company doing the editing should document which company's
imagery and which revision year they are using. Things should be as
transparent as possible, and this doesn't feel that way.
There was a recent subthread on this issue on the
Darafei Praliaskouski via talk writes:
> This is okay. You still have the access to the reality to check if the edit
> matches the reality.
>
> The core reason why companies can't share the imagery is that satellite
> imagery providers often put a seat license on the imagery, with "publicly
>
This is okay. You still have the access to the reality to check if the edit
matches the reality.
The core reason why companies can't share the imagery is that satellite
imagery providers often put a seat license on the imagery, with "publicly
available" costing ten times as much as "this specific
Am 27.10.2022 um 06:17 schrieb Michael Collinson:
and note that Bing imagery is provided to us on the same basis - for
use in OSM but not otherwise.
Mike
Bing imagery is available for inspection to everybody, for use in OSM
terms are relaxed that would otherwise prohibit tracing etc.
Not
and note that Bing imagery is provided to us on the same basis - for use
in OSM but not otherwise.
Mike
On 2022-10-27 00:08, Clifford Snow wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 2:59 PM Mike Thompson wrote:
Concerning this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128035436
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 2:59 PM Mike Thompson wrote:
> Concerning this changeset:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128035436
>
> Changeset comment:
>
> added missing roads according to proprietary aerial imagery
>
> Editing organization's follow on comment:
> "Proprietary" for Lyft
Concerning this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128035436
Changeset comment:
added missing roads according to proprietary aerial imagery
Editing organization's follow on comment:
"Proprietary" for Lyft meaning "provided to us for use in OSM but not the
general public"
Is
9 matches
Mail list logo
