Re: [talk-au] Discussion E: how to find faults in maps

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden David Wales
An example from the page Warin linked which may interest you is the [Bicycle Tags map][1]. [1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle_tags_map) For example, [here is Canberra][2] with all 'highway=cycleway' and 'bicycle=yes' tagged ways highlighted: [2]:

Re: [talk-au] Discussion E: how to find faults in maps

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Warin
On 29/09/19 07:30, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au wrote: I welcome your comments. 1) This is not Australian specific. 2) The topic is an FAQ 3) Before you post .. do some research Read and use the tools from here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance There are at least 264

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing buildings in Canada

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Steve Singer
On Sat, 28 Sep 2019, Nate Wessel wrote: I for one would be happy to support a local effort to import high quality buildings in Toronto and/or the GTA. I think if we can actually meet up face to face our discussions may remain a bit more civil and productive. Hopefully consensus will be a bit

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing buildings in Canada

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden stevea
And several years later, here we are. I'm glad to see such a "new arrival" at a place where good data can meet a good crowdsourced mapping database, and furthermore, I wish the project all good luck. SteveA California ___ Talk-ca mailing list

[talk-au] Discussion E: how to find faults in maps

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Herbert.Remi via Talk-au
# Discussion E: how to find faults in maps ## The Issue The ACT has 3000km of roads, 2000km of footpaths, and 329 km of shared bike paths, 1000s of km of formed trails (2/3 the state is rideable), a few 100kms of mountain biking "single-track" and a few dozen active planners at best. How do

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] switch2OSM

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Vincent de Château-Thierry
Bonsoir, Le 28/09/2019 à 22:48, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : Christian, tu dis que les entreprises sont assez réactives si on les titille sur Twitter, tu peux vérifier : https://twitter.com/Mappy Twitter c'est bien quand on ne connaît pas ses interlocuteurs et qu'on veut leur

[OSM-talk-fr] switch2OSM

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden osm . sanspourriel
Joli poisson : sur la carte des Pages Jaunes (Mappy) j'ai eu la surprise de voir : © Mappy | 2018 TomTom, OpenStreetMap. Bien ? Oui et non car seul Mappy est muni d'un lien. Et le lien

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing buildings in Canada

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden John Whelan
My suggestion would be to amend and clean up the original import plan to split out the country into regions and have a regional coordinator for each region based on local input.  I'd also add in the two other data sources as alternative data sources. The reason for this approach is an amended

Re: [Talk-at] Pflanzfläche Bäume Mur Graz

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Robert Grübler
Am Freitag, 30. August 2019 15:26 schrieb Lars Schimmer: > Dort habe ich mal an der Stelle des Ausgleichsbereiches > https://osm.org/go/0Iz_pZwBc--?layers=N > das Wasser eingezeichnet, ... > ... > das Wasser hat Verbindung mit der Mur, > möchte aber die Murrelation ned kaputt machen Das

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing buildings in Canada

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden John Whelan
And I totally agree.  Because the Stat Can data has come from many sources the data quality is variable to put it politely.  The Microsoft data has been shown in the US to also be of variable quality.  I'm not so sure about the NR Can LiDAR data hopefully it is at least consistent. If we look

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Andrew Hain
We can check for properties where the brand:wikidata tag was left behind by checking the other tags, particularly name= and shop=. -- Andrew From: SK53 Sent: 28 September 2019 17:32 To: Silent Spike Cc: Talk GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing buildings in Canada

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Nate Wessel
I for one would be happy to support a local effort to import high quality buildings in Toronto and/or the GTA. I think if we can actually meet up face to face our discussions may remain a bit more civil and productive. Hopefully consensus will be a bit easier to achieve with smaller groups

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing buildings in Canada

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Jarek Piórkowski
Hi all, To be a bit more positive: If we want to get buildings on the map, but we can't get Canada-wide data improved by Statcan to a standard acceptable to all mappers in Canada, IMO the best bet will be to split this into much smaller batches and support local mappers who would be interested

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden SK53
The specific problem with that suggestion is that you miss lots of Thomas Cook shops (particularly old Co-op Travel & Ilkeston Co-op travel): it hits about 3 within 15 miles of Nottingham whereas there are nearer 11 (for obvious reasons), and one of those is apparently is not

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing buildings in Canada

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Pierre Béland via Talk-ca
Je comprends que c'est la saison des tomates. Mais essayons de les utiliser pour nos conserves et non comme argument pour convaincre les autres contributeurs !  ;) Comme les autres l'ont exprimé, c'est à ceux qui proposent de faire des imports de bien documenter le processus, non l'inverse. Et

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Silent Spike
It's unclear to me if there's a consensus on the tagging here. Personally I like the `disused:` prefix. I couldn't see if it was mentioned anywhere, but we can also query for all the locations explicitly marked as part of the Thomas Cook brand using the `brand:wikidata` tag:

Re: [Talk-GB] Next quarters project will be fixmes and notes

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Philip Barnes
OSMand also shows them. Phil (trigpoint) On Tuesday, 24 September 2019, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 24/09/2019 13:24, Michael Booth wrote: > > Fixmes can only be viewed in iD or with a QA tool, while notes can be > > viewed on osm.org and StreetComplete which is useful for actually > > going

Re: [Talk-it] Tag ref anche per Codice Fiscale

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Francesco Ansanelli
Ciao Marco! In realtà le aziende italiane hanno entrambi i codici anche se spesso coincidono... Il sab 28 set 2019, 09:54 mbranco2 ha scritto: > Ciao Francesco, > visto che lasciamo perdere i codici fiscali personali, e quindi parliamo > solo del codice numerico di 11 cifre dei soggetti che

Re: [Talk-it] Tag ref anche per Codice Fiscale

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden mbranco2
Ciao Francesco, visto che lasciamo perdere i codici fiscali personali, e quindi parliamo solo del codice numerico di 11 cifre dei soggetti che non sono persone fisiche, c'è già il tag ref:vatin che avevi citato all'inizio... Il giorno sab 28 set 2019 alle ore 09:23 Francesco Ansanelli <

Re: [Talk-it] Tag ref anche per Codice Fiscale

2019-09-28 Diskussionsfäden Francesco Ansanelli
Ciao, se nessuno ha qualcosa in contrario, propongo di togliere i codici fiscali alfanumerici che, come segnalato da Andrea, sono anche dati personali e di indicare solo quelli numerici, visto che si tratta di un dato specifico per le aziende italiane, associazioni/enti e bed and breakfast,