Le 14/07/2020 à 18:29, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit :
> Certes la situation est un peu différente mais après avoir essayé
> (souvent avec succès) de récupérer les développeurs de bibliothèques et
> d'outil OpenSource (comme Dane Springmeyer ouVladimir Agafonkin), voici
> que MapBox
On 13/07/2020 17.46, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us wrote:
Jul 13, 2020, 20:29 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com:
It is still required to use a separate account for manually audited changes?
Is it going to be "by comparing dataset X and OSM I found places to map roads
that I added
using aerial
On 7/14/2020 7:44 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Around me the norm is that residential driveways (98% of them) are not
signed no trespassing, but that it is considered reasonable to use them
if 1) you live there 2) you are delivering something 3) you are a guest
4) you are going there for some other
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 5:46 AM Greg Troxel wrote:
> So a router that does not allow use of access=private for a final
> segment, by default, is broken.
+1
Even if we go with the idea that driveways are not access=private unless
posted, there are some driveways that are posted, and people
On 14.07.2020 17:21, o...@poppe.dev wrote:
> ... again, your wording sounds like you don't trust the organizations further
> that you could throw a rock and basically discard their efforts as those of
> money-hungry, evil corporations that aren't interested in the humanitarian
> aspect at all
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 09:30:00PM +0100, Adam Snape wrote:
>
> this point if we're actually advocating the hitherto undocumented usage of
> segregated=yes to mean 'cycleway is separate from main carriageway' because
> I suspect I'm not the only one whose been using it as per the wiki to show
>
A noter que le nouveau pont comprend une piste à une voie côté nord et une
piste à deux voies côté sud. J'ai vérifié aujourd'hui, ce qui confirme que les
travaux ne sont complétés que pour la voie côté nord et la voie côté sud ne
sera pas opérationnelle avant l'automne. Aucun accès à proximité
I'm not saying it's terrible but as you note it's not exactly an optimum
example of good mapping.
Just as with roads, I tend to view cycleway surface tags as distinctly
optional/low priority where they confirm to the default of being asphalt
and of great importance where they deviate from that
I do have to say that surface info is very useful. A lot of cycleways have
gravel sections and that can be no fun on, say, a Brompton bike with 16” wheels.
Much like pavements, I’d start my focus on the details which are not what you
might expect, like where a road doesn’t have a pedestrian
Quite agree, whilst harmless oneway=no seems a bit OTT, as tbh does marking
the surface on every single asphalt cycleway...
I have utmost respect for cyclestreets but that tagging guidance does seem
garbled at points
Since when has the segregated=yes/no tag on a cycleway referred to the
Am 13.07.20 um 22:42 schrieb Manuela Schmidt:
> Hallo,
>
>> Vielleicht kannst Du mir aber helfen. Gibt es Arbeiten welche sich mit
>> dem Potential im Einsatz von OpenSource Software wie Fossgis, und
>> OpenStreetMap auseinandersetzen.
> Es gibt eine Vielzahl akademischer Arbeiten in diesem
At least in English,
"not reuse the Information in a way that suggests that it is official or
that Licensor approves your use of the Information;
take all reasonable steps to ensure that the uses permitted above do not
mislead others and that the Information itself is not misrepresented."
reads as
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 05:07:04PM +0200, Martin Schmidl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In a project of mine I am using OSM data from a city for 7 different years.
> Recent data from 2020 acts as the reference. I want to see how different
> changes in the data will affect the routing for quality
Certes la situation est un peu différente mais après avoir essayé
(souvent avec succès) de récupérer les développeurs de bibliothèques et
d'outil OpenSource (comme Dane Springmeyer ouVladimir Agafonkin), voici
que MapBox continue sa politique de sortie du libre.
On les avait déjà vus à l’œuvre
sent from a phone
> On 14. Jul 2020, at 15:28, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> Maybe they assume that it is covered
> anyway by moral rights?
>
> But ODBL waives moral rights if allowed
> by law,
> it attempts to block asserting such claims,
> and so on.
>
> Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer etc
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 7:46 AM Greg Troxel wrote:
> ...
>
> As for access=private 'breaking' routing, this discussion feels very
> much like tagging for the router, instead of tagging what is and fixing
> the router. If you are driving someplace and you have permission, then
> it should be
Hi Andy and mappamercia
I've delved into this some more and it appears that the Geopark is a
collection of pre-existing sites so mapping them as a relation shouldn't be
too difficult. However the list of sites is published on the geopark
website
Hola,
Hace 1 mes aproximadamente escribí un script que añade el enlace de
los visores de conjuntos de cambios (achavi y osmcha) a las páginas en
osm.org de detalles de los elementos OSM (punto, línea, área), página
de historial, página de cambios de amigos, y página de ediciones de
usuarios
> I've been asked to clarify this as it might come across as a personal
> attack which was not intended, sorry.
Apology accepted, but ...
> The, very well funded, organizations in OSM space that claim
> "Humanitarian" for themselves, market themselves mainly by having a
> never ending stream of
Hi,
In a project of mine I am using OSM data from a city for 7 different years.
Recent data from 2020 acts as the reference. I want to see how different
changes in the data will affect the routing for quality reasons (e.g: If i
used data from 2014 today, will my route be better or worse?).
For
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, July 14, 2020 10:15 AM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> The (possible) problem with having access implied by service=driveway is
> that a lot of access roads to stores/businesses/offices are also
>
I've been asked to clarify this as it might come across as a personal
attack which was not intended, sorry.
The, very well funded, organizations in OSM space that claim
"Humanitarian" for themselves, market themselves mainly by having a
never ending stream of emergencies (some real, some not,
First I heard about it. I created teams for Cork and Ireland.
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 15:14, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> On 07/07/2020, Donal Hunt wrote:
> > https://osmcha.org has a teams function which allows you to see changes
> > over time. See https://osmcha.org/teams
> > Pascal Neis also
On 14/07/2020 09.44, Alex Hennings wrote:
Regarding:
a driveway to a house should not be tagged access=yes
because a no trespassing sign cannot be seen. That is a complete
violation of verfiability, becuase the mapper has zero evidence that
access should be yes.
*Given our defaults, no access
On 07/07/2020, Donal Hunt wrote:
> https://osmcha.org has a teams function which allows you to see changes
> over time. See https://osmcha.org/teams
> Pascal Neis also has some tools. e.g. you can visualise by hashtag here:
>
Hola llista,
He fet un repàs amb el overpass de les velocitats màximes a Catalunya per
tindre una idea orientativa de com estan i es el següent:
*Tipus de via* *Elements sense maxspeed*
motorway 36
trunk 610
primary 5407
secondary 8424
tertiary 21527
Jo usant OpenStreetCam i Mapillary he pogut
Per quelle che conosco nel Nord Milano sono spesso indicate le sedi vecchie
di almeno 10 anni.
Il mar 14 lug 2020, 15:02 Cascafico Giovanni ha
scritto:
> Ciao,
>
> se qualcuno vuole fare qualche valutazione sulla precisione delle
> coordinate:
>
> http://u.osmfr.org/m/480434
>
>
Regarding:
> a driveway to a house should not be tagged access=yes
> because a no trespassing sign cannot be seen. That is a complete
> violation of verfiability, becuase the mapper has zero evidence that
> access should be yes.
*Given our defaults, no access tag is equivalent> to that.*
You're
Ciao,
nella mia zona, tranne qualche eccezione, le biblioteche sono
posizionati abbastanza male. Inoltre, sono presenti anche biblioteche
chiuse o trasferite da diverso tempo.
Ciao,
Andrea
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 3:02 PM Cascafico Giovanni
wrote:
> Ciao,
>
> se qualcuno vuole fare
14 Jul 2020, 14:54 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>
>> On 14. Jul 2020, at 12:40, Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk
>> wrote:
>>
>> Such data is incompatible with
>> OSM requirements, must not be
>> imported, must be removed as
>> copyright violation if added already.
>>
sent from a phone
> On 14. Jul 2020, at 14:48, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> ho anche trovato un paper che lo dice:
> https://www.jlis.it/article/downloadSuppFile/5461/271
in realtà dice che è “probabilmente“ ok, visto la dichiarazione del license
steward, per la IODL2, mentre per la
Non per fare il menagramo, ma quando è stata decretata l'emergenza
c'erano molti meno casi di oggi ...e la discesa ha rallentato.
Il 14/07/20, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 14. Jul 2020, at 13:13, Francesco Ansanelli
>> wrote:
>>
>> Gli orari di apertura covid
Ciao,
se qualcuno vuole fare qualche valutazione sulla precisione delle coordinate:
http://u.osmfr.org/m/480434
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
sent from a phone
> On 14. Jul 2020, at 12:40, Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk
> wrote:
>
> Such data is incompatible with
> OSM requirements, must not be
> imported, must be removed as
> copyright violation if added already.
on the plus side there is a declaration of the license steward
sent from a phone
> On 11. Jul 2020, at 19:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> non è questione della ODbL, la questione è il progetto OpenStreetMap, che
> consente a chiunque di modificare tutto
in realtà sembra che sia problema della compatibilità con la Odbl, così hanno
scritto in ml
sent from a phone
> On 14. Jul 2020, at 13:13, Francesco Ansanelli wrote:
>
> Gli orari di apertura covid andrebbero trasformati in orari di apertura o
> assumi che sia tutto come prima?
assumo che sia tutto come prima.
Se pensate che avrebbe senso lasciare i tag un altro po’, potrebbe
Après essai la gestion des doublons est prisent en compte. Un message
d'information indique que l'envoi est déjà prévu ou déjà fait.
J'ai tellement de séquences à envoyer que la file d'attente est longue mais
d'autres tests doivent être fait.
J'ai constaté que si un envoi est déjà prévu et
Perso j'indique la limite sur la voie concernée. Pour le panneau et pour
alléger les modifications pour le jour où les limites changent je m'abstient de
créer les panneaux.
Prends le cas ou la vitesse est changée sur place et tu a les deux
informations. Si tu en oubli une, un autre
"Is it one-way? oneway=yes / oneway=no"
is it really a good idea to always include oneway=no?
I would consider it as kind of pointless to require
oneway tag to be always present
I added some advertisement for StreetComplete
(I implemented for example bicycle_parking quests
as part of my plan for
Jul 14, 2020, 13:17 by jm...@gmx.com:
> On 7/14/2020 4:53 AM, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us wrote:
>
>>
>> Jul 14, 2020, 02:20 by >> jm...@gmx.com>> :
>>
>>> If there was reason to believe you needed explicit permission to
>>> be on
>>> that way, then access=private would be
Tod Fitch writes:
> There are “gated communities” where you can’t get in unless you have a
> card key or speak with a gate keeper. Those should, I think, have
> access=private as you need explicit permission on each entry.
>
> But for the case where the road is privately owned but the owner
>
Ahoj,
eh, jo, pardon, v mezičase jsem to smazal, protože jako chorvatština to
byl zjevný nesmysl. Vráceno tedy jako němčina.
BTW, tady[1] je z nějakého důvodu arabsky napsáno prostě "rovník", takže
je otázka, jestli tyhle věci vůbec dávat do "name:xx", a ne třeba do
"inscription:xx".
[1]
On 7/14/2020 4:53 AM, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us wrote:
Jul 14, 2020, 02:20 by jm...@gmx.com:
On 7/13/2020 4:09 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 13/07/2020 15.16, Kevin Kenny wrote:
The immediate curtilage of a house is presumed to be
private; at least
Ciao Martin,
Ti riferisci solo all'Italia, vero?
Gli orari di apertura covid andrebbero trasformati in orari di apertura o
assumi che sia tutto come prima?
Grazie
Francesco
Il mar 14 lug 2020, 11:02 Martin Koppenhoefer ha
scritto:
> Come da oggetto, propongo un edit automatico per cancellare
14 Jul 2020, 11:37 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
> Can we guarantee that the contained information is not "misrepresented"?
>
No. ODBL has no such restrictions.
Therefore OSM data can be used in
several evil or non-evil ways
that would violate such clauses.
Such data is incompatible with
OSM
El usuario en cuestión fue bloqueado ayer para 6 meses:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3799
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 13:29, Miguel Sevilla-Callejo
wrote:
> Hola,
>
> En su mensaje a esta misma lista de correo la persona que está detrás del
> usuario jlcc78 (José Sánchez) afirma [1]:
On 7/13/2020 3:22 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
Out of curiosity, I looked at the tagging of a neighborhood I know of
which has privately owned roads (maintained by the homeowner’s
association) but no gate blocking entry. There are signs indicating
that the roads are “private” but that state road
In recent local discussions it has emerged that some license has conditions
for the reuse of the data, which may eventually not be completely
compatible with OSM.
In particular it relates to an Italian license which states as a condition
you have to
"not reuse the Information in a way that
Bonjour,
Je fais des capture d'itinéraires avec Mapillary.
Quelques temps plus tard Osmose me propose les panneaux maxspeed /
maxweight.
Autant que possible je reporte les restrictions sur la route.
Mais j'en fais quoi de ces panneaux ?
- posés sur le bord/dans le fossé ?
- sur la way de
Come da oggetto, propongo un edit automatico per cancellare gli
opening_hours:covid19=*
(e forse altri tag covid19, se ci sono).
Ciao
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Jul 14, 2020, 02:20 by jm...@gmx.com:
> On 7/13/2020 4:09 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>
>> On 13/07/2020 15.16, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The immediate curtilage of a house is presumed to be private; at least
>>> in the US, one does not drive or walk directly up to someone's house
>>>
Le 19/06/2020 à 11:59, Jean-Christophe Becquet a écrit :
Bonjour,
Comment bien taguer ces points qualifiés par erreur comme panneaux
publicitaires alors qu'il s'agit de panneaux de direction ?
Les 2 premiers indiquent des quartiers ou des équipements structurants
pour la ville.
Le 10/07/2020 à 13:36, Jacques Lavignotte a écrit :
Ce noeud
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7701888072
"Nouveau lieu de loisirs et d’animations familiales"
selon :
https://www.lanouvellerepublique.fr/vienne/a-biard-ce-soir-le-mana-ouvre-ses-portes-en-fanfare
comme on y joue à la
Hi Calayde,
have you seen the following advice already?
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/28829/upload-shapefile-to-osm
Best, Reuben
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 09:45, Calayde Davey wrote:
> Thank you,
>
> I am unfamiliar with the details - I will try my best this week, and reach
> back out
Bonjour,
Le site http://bestofosm.org ne répond plus.
Si, c'est juste le certificat qui a expiré depuis... mars.
Jean-Yvon
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Thanks Frederik,
Looking on the positive side, it's nice to know that people out there want
our maps.
Regards,
Jez
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, 20:56 Frederik Ramm, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the DWG has received the following message:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > A bit of feedback.
> > The openstreet map
Bonjour,
Le site http://bestofosm.org ne répond plus.
La page FR:Cartothèque sur le wiki OpenStreetMap qui propose de recenser
des exemples de qualité n'a pas été mise à jour depuis 2018.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartoth%C3%A8que
Je trouve très utile d'avoir sous la main une
J'ai testé cet nuit et ça fonctionne bien.
Par contre ce matin sur mon petit écran j'ai appuyé de nouveau sur upload.
J'espère que ça ne va pas repartir en double.
Tu a des infos à ce sujet ?
Le July 11, 2020 7:52:48 PM UTC, Jacques Lavignotte a
écrit :
>Lu sur le foroum Mapillary :
>
>
>I
58 matches
Mail list logo
