Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Ian Sergeant
Delta Foxtrot delta_foxt...@yahoo.com I recently started adding data to OSM, Welcome. but one thing that caused me a little confusion was the fact that one of the towns I was mapping round has a river running through it, but there is no river plotted on the map, and now that I think about

Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Delta Foxtrot
--- On Tue, 19/5/09, Ian Sergeant iserg...@hih.com.au wrote: Waterways should be mapped Sometimes landsat or yahoo imagery can help. What's the url for landsat or how do I make use of it, yahoo images are pretty course in rural areas from what I've seen so far. Sometime the ABS

Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Ian Sergeant
Delta Foxtrot delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote: What's the url for landsat or how do I make use of it, yahoo images are pretty course in rural areas from what I've seen so far. They are. I guess this is one of the reasons why your waterway hasn't been mapped. If you are using potlatch, then the

Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Ross Scanlon
So what is the problem you are having, if not with the location or the tag? Making a river look like a river... Put more nodes in the way that shows the river. Had a look at what you have done but given the lack of hi-res images from yahoo there is not much else that can be done. Welcome

Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Delta Foxtrot
--- On Tue, 19/5/09, Ian Sergeant iserg...@hih.com.au wrote: You may want to consider JOSM.  It allows you to lock the imagery scale at the best available, and then zoom in.  Sometimes that makes things easier, and I'm not sure if potlatch can do that.  Still, I would have thought that

Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Ian Sergeant
Delta Foxtrot delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm curious as to why yahoo sat images can be used and google ones can't? Yahoo have sent an OSM contributor an email, confirming that their imagery is okay for use in the way OSM uses it. Google have not given their permission, and have given

Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Delta Foxtrot
--- On Tue, 19/5/09, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: The source tag is part of the OSM data not part of the GPS information, have a look at the source tag on Glen Innes Road. I thought information could be included in the GPX files that would be imported by something, JOSM or OSM

Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Ross Scanlon
--- On Tue, 19/5/09, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: The source tag is part of the OSM data not part of the GPS information, have a look at the source tag on Glen Innes Road. I thought information could be included in the GPX files that would be imported by something, JOSM or OSM

Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Delta Foxtrot
--- On Wed, 20/5/09, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: AFAIK it is only lat, long and elevation data.  How did you enter the name and surface tags for the ways.  The source tag is the same. GPX files can contain a lot of data and meta data, the schema for GPX 1.1 can be found here:

Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Delta Foxtrot
--- On Tue, 19/5/09, Ian Sergeant iserg...@hih.com.au wrote: I would leave the river running down the centre, and mark the lake area polygons with natural=water.   You can also use waterway=riverbank to draw a wider river.  See how other people have tagged other rivers. Just looking at,

Re: [talk-au] Rivers

2009-05-19 Thread Ian Sergeant
Delta Foxtrot delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote on 20/05/2009 03:36:26 PM: Just looking at, I think, the Clarence river near Grafton: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-29.6174 lon=152.9053zoom=14layers=B000FTF The river banks are listed as natural=coastline Which is the better/correct way to