On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> I would have thought so, because afaik these rules are to reduce
> traffic noise. Bicycles not being noisy, I would have thought they
> weren't included.
Maybe, but it's unclear... Anyone good at chasing down legal
definitions of road sign
Not strictly OSM, but worth a look to see the distribution and scale
of the impact
http://www.abc.net.au/news/events/haiti-earthquake/map.htm
jim
--
_
Jim Croft ~ jim.cr...@gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
http://www.google.com/profiles/jim.croft
'A civilized society is one which tol
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> I don't know. What are you basing that on? Can you legally ride a bike
> through a Local Traffic Only area? No idea, but I suspect not...
I would have thought so, because afaik these rules are to reduce
traffic noise. Bicycles not being noisy,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> Logically, "access=destination" would apply to all forms of traffic.
> So you should tag it "motor_vehicle=destination", right?
I don't know. What are you basing that on? Can you legally ride a bike
through a Local Traffic Only area? No i
I've played around with the alcohol relations a bit, changing the type
of relation to site, rather than multipolygon.
And have created a special relation for St Leonard's park, as it's
weird.
Alcohol free: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/384684
Alcohol prohibited: http://www.openstree
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> For roads with e.g. "Local Traffic Only" or "Through Traffic Keep
> Right" signs, should these be tagged with:
>
> access=destination (as is, I understand, common practice), OR
> vehicle=destination, OR something else?
>
> Apparently (says Davi
For roads with e.g. "Local Traffic Only" or "Through Traffic Keep
Right" signs, should these be tagged with:
access=destination (as is, I understand, common practice), OR
vehicle=destination, OR something else?
Apparently (says DavidDean), Gosmore excludes roads tagged with
access=destination whe
That relation proposal looks useful. I had one awkward situation
recently where a bike path and a road cross a freeway together. But
half way over the bridge, the bike path crosses the road (that is,
switches from the right side to the left, by making a right angled
crossing). Since both bike path
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 07:04 +1000, John Smith wrote:
I never did get round to doing the one I was going to do before I had
> to leave, so well done...
>
> The only comment is on the prohibited relation, is it really needed to
> do the inner sections of St Leonards Park, when you have the outer
> s
Often, if a bridge is named, I think it should be rendered. In
Brisbane, for example, everybody knows the Storey Bridge. Hardly
anybody recognises the name of the road that crosses it (which is no
longer than the bridge plus ramps). If you were given directions in
cross the river on the Story bri
Totally missed the Proposed Features as mentioned by Roy.
I went with the "bridge_name=..." option, the reasoning being that the road
goes over the bridge & therefore labelling the way that crosses the bridge
with the bridge name is topologically incorrect.
If you name the road section with the bri
This is exactly how I envisaged that it would be done - well done.
Will use the same methodology for the Alcohol Free Zone in central Bendigo
(when I get the chance).
I decided tonight I might try and play around with alcohol-free zones
> using a few relations using North Sydney as an example.
>
>
2010/1/15 :
> 1. mapping does exist in the first place which is stored off-site (ie
> internationally)
Yes, but up to date imagery gives allows us to create up to date maps,
which gives emergency services better information so they can come up
with better plans to deal with disasters and better p
> 2010/1/14 Jim Croft :
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Haiti#2010_Earthquake_Response
>> http://blog.ushahidi.com/index.php/2010/01/13/haiti-earthquake/
>
> I'm not trying to detract from how badly off people are in Haiti...
> but nothing like this occurred when Australia had tho
-- Forwarded message --
From: Cameron Shorter
Date: 2010/1/15
Subject: Re: [Aust-NZ] OSGeo booth at upcoming international
Federation of Surveyor's conference?
To: John Smith
Cc: Jody Garnett , "aust...@lists.osgeo.org"
John,
We'd welcome OSM on the OSGeo stand if we get one.
2010/1/15 John Smith :
> 2010/1/14 :
>> As always, suggestions are welcome :)
>
> I never did get round to doing the one I was going to do before I had
> to leave, so well done...
>
> The only comment is on the prohibited relation, is it really needed to
> do the inner sections of St Leonards Park
2010/1/14 :
> As always, suggestions are welcome :)
I never did get round to doing the one I was going to do before I had
to leave, so well done...
The only comment is on the prohibited relation, is it really needed to
do the inner sections of St Leonards Park, when you have the outer
section of
2010/1/15 Liz :
> I just put name=Whatever Bridge on the bridge section.
> It'll be interesting to hear how others do this and if there are particular
> reasons why.
+1
I'm yet to find a roundabout name, so far I've left them all blank,
even ones where there is no intersecting streets.
_
2010/1/14 Jim Croft :
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Haiti#2010_Earthquake_Response
> http://blog.ushahidi.com/index.php/2010/01/13/haiti-earthquake/
I'm not trying to detract from how badly off people are in Haiti...
but nothing like this occurred when Australia had those really
2010/1/14 Jim Croft :
> forgotten the context, but there was some chat a few weeks back on
> standard date formats, date ranges. etc.
>
> this may be of interest:
> http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/examples.html
I think you are referring to the thread on opening hours, but this
isn't simple d
>From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:
"For the name of the bridge itself there are two proposals:
bridge_name [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bridge_Name]
and one using relations
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels#Tags]";
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Craig Feuerherdt wrote:
> I know I have seen a thread on this but I can't find it again.
> I am wanting to name a bridge on a road. Current keys for the road are;
> highway=unclassified
> name=River Road
> layer=1
>
> For the bridge section I have added;
> bridge=yes
> layer=1
I know I have seen a thread on this but I can't find it again.
I am wanting to name a bridge on a road. Current keys for the road are;
highway=unclassified
name=River Road
layer=1
For the bridge section I have added;
bridge=yes
layer=1
How do I capture the bridge name "Noel Tuohen Bridge"? Do I a
I decided tonight I might try and play around with alcohol-free zones
using a few relations using North Sydney as an example.
Alcohol free: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/384684
Alcohol prohibited: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/384683
("View relation on larger map" mak
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Haiti#2010_Earthquake_Response
http://blog.ushahidi.com/index.php/2010/01/13/haiti-earthquake/
jim
--
_
Jim Croft ~ jim.cr...@gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
http://www.google.com/profiles/jim.croft
'A civilized society is one which tol
forgotten the context, but there was some chat a few weeks back on
standard date formats, date ranges. etc.
this may be of interest:
http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/examples.html
jim
--
_
Jim Croft ~ jim.cr...@gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
http://www.google.com/profiles/jim
26 matches
Mail list logo
