I've just sent an enquiry to the AGIMO asking if this is true because
the LWG has given no proof.
Just like others I would like to know if the AGIMO has the authority
to do a blanket license grant on other agencies data, or if they have
actually received this special permission from each agency wh
On 24 September 2011 00:30, Richard Weait wrote:
> even though the data is unencumbered. I couldn't possibly comment on
> why a particular user might continue to decline CT/ODbL with their
> import account for a particular data set, when that dataset is
> suitable and permitted for inclusion unde
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Grant Slater
wrote:
> The Licensing Working Group has obtained explicit special permission
> to incorporate geographic datasets from data.gov.au
Grant
Would you be kind enough to provide a link to this explicit special
permission please?
80n
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Grant Slater
> wrote:
>> The Licensing Working Group has obtained explicit special permission
>> to incorporate geographic datasets from data.gov.au in the
>> OpenStreetMap project database publish
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Grant Slater
wrote:
> The Licensing Working Group has obtained explicit special permission
> to incorporate geographic datasets from data.gov.au in the
> OpenStreetMap project database published under any free and open
> license, including ODbL
That is a huge reli
The Licensing Working Group has obtained explicit special permission
to incorporate geographic datasets from data.gov.au in the
OpenStreetMap project database published under any free and open
license, including ODbL, provided that
a) we provide primary attribution in a reasonable manner ( current
6 matches
Mail list logo