Re: [talk-au] Using data from traditional owners of the land / Current waiver form

I had a quick check of the area and I reckon the trail ‘follows’ many of the roads/4wd tracks in the area and then deviates to places of interests so it’s not a rigidly defined track/walk. One each guided walk there may well be different places visited depending on the season or the conditions

Re: [talk-au] Using data from traditional owners of the land / Current waiver form

Intentionally not mapping a path in public space seems unsafe. What if someone gets lost on this trail and needs to find the way back? On 24 August 2018 6:48:18 am ACST, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: >On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 20:38, Ewen Hill wrote: > >> >> It's an interesting conundrum that

Re: [talk-au] Using data from traditional owners of the land / Current waiver form

On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 20:38, Ewen Hill wrote: > > It's an interesting conundrum that perhaps going forward we need to flag > how > we deal with sacred areas and knowledge that should be respected by not > being mapped. > But the Trail itself is open for anybody to walk along, isn't it? So

Re: [talk-au] Using data from traditional owners of the land / Current waiver form

On 23/08/18 20:37, Ewen Hill wrote: It's an interesting conundrum that perhaps going forward we need to flag how we deal with sacred areas and knowledge that should be respected by not being mapped. Some of the problem is that in signifying and area as 'not to be mapped' it may draw

Re: [talk-au] Using data from traditional owners of the land / Current waiver form

Phil, Thank you for the reply and insight into some of the difficulties. I dealt with a community during an emergency recently and their knowledge of what was sacred and historic was immense and appeared spot on. The trail is the Lurujarri Heritage Trail as you suspected. I have just had an