On 13/08/19 10:02, David Wales wrote:
I mainly do it if I need a break from adding useful data... And it
makes the map look pretty.
Also, could it be useful for fire fighters?
It is useful for fire-fighters here, there is even a movement to place
signs on the street to indicate where they ar
I mainly do it if I need a break from adding useful data... And it makes the
map look pretty.
Also, could it be useful for fire fighters?
On 13 August 2019 9:50:01 am AEST, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>On 13/8/19 09:22, Ian Sergeant wrote:
>> For OSM it's nothing more than a colouring-in exercise.
>
On 13/8/19 09:22, Ian Sergeant wrote:
For OSM it's nothing more than a colouring-in exercise.
Once again it depends on what use you think the data is going to be used
for. If you're interested in selling tennis court maintenance services
then it's useful information. Maybe you're interested i
On 13/8/19 08:59, Sebastian S. wrote:
I've also been mapping pools occasionally.
Thinking about it I'm actually not sure what the value for the map could be but
they stand out a lot on good quality aerial images.
Mapping them is probably adding about the same amount of value to the
map as map
In my view - the reason apple is mapping private tennis courts, is not
because it actually sees a benefit in mapping peoples backyard, it's
because it's using a level of automation that recognises them. For OSM
it's nothing more than a colouring-in exercise.
I agree with Andrew that marking a bui
I've also been mapping pools occasionally.
Thinking about it I'm actually not sure what the value for the map could be but
they stand out a lot on good quality aerial images.
access=private for sure.
On 13 August 2019 8:23:08 am AEST, David Wales wrote:
>I think in this day and age, we can't rea
I think in this day and age, we can't really consider anything private
if it's visible from space...
Apple appears to be mapping backyard tennis courts now.
https://www.justinobeirne.com/new-apple-maps
Just make sure that you tag them as access=private !
On 12/8/19 7:58 pm, Warin wrote:
> On 12/
Thanks for that information I will defiantly work on implementing those.
Thanks, Ben.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 21:09, Michael Collinson wrote:
> I usually mark all residential buildings, including the main house or
> strata building, as building=residential. I feel it useful but safe. I
> usuall
I usually mark all residential buildings, including the main house or
strata building, as building=residential. I feel it useful but safe. I
usually map in Sweden where planning regulations encourage a plethora of
out-buildings whose use is difficult to judge from imagery: garages,
spare rooms
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 20:00, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/08/19 19:46, Benjamin Ceravolo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been tracing in residential swimming pools
Please use access=private on those that aren't open to the public.
> > and I have not as yet
> > found an appropr
On 12/08/19 19:46, Benjamin Ceravolo wrote:
Hi all,
I've been tracing in residential swimming pools and I have not as yet
found an appropriate tagging for the small poolside buildings that
(from my experience); may have an area to get changed and to store
pool-toys, chemicals and other pool c
Hi all,
I've been tracing in residential swimming pools and I have not as yet found
an appropriate tagging for the small poolside buildings that (from my
experience); may have an area to get changed and to store pool-toys,
chemicals and other pool care items.
My current guess is just to mark it a
12 matches
Mail list logo
