Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
It applies to the world.
There is nothing Australian specific that I can see in your thoughts ..
Nor can I see why ACT should be different from the rest of the world in
how it maps bicycle infrastructure.
On 06/10/19 09:47, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au wrote:
I apologise for the tone of the first post yesterday. I was a bit unwell.
***
# The ATG proposed changes for paths in the ACT
I have decided to write this as a proposal of changes to the ATG in
the ACT (if any) and consideration of the
On 6/10/19 8:12 am, David Wales wrote:
Why did he remove the bridge tag?
I think he doesn't understand how to tag man_made=bridge because he took
the bridge tags off the other ways as well:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69845883
___
I apologise for the tone of the first post yesterday. I was a bit unwell.
***
# The ATG proposed changes for paths in the ACT
I have decided to write this as a proposal of changes to the ATG in the ACT (if
any) and consideration of the consequences. For the paths found in the ACT, I
will
So long as access and gates are correctly tagged, I can't see a reason not to
map private roads.
On 5 October 2019 8:34:59 pm AEST, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
>
>
>
>5 Oct 2019, 01:44 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
>> The problem here is that some raise the "not map the interiorprivate
>roads in
Why did he remove the bridge tag?
On 5 October 2019 8:16:35 pm AEST, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>On 4/10/19 10:53 pm, Andy Townsend wrote:
>>
>>
>https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1698#issuecomment-134914770
>
>>
>
>Thanks for that. I hadn't realised there was yet another
5 Oct 2019, 12:53 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
> As I see it the options are;
>
> * Do not map.
> * Map the entry only.
> * Map it all.
>
There are some objects where not mapping
them and removal of mapped objects is justifiable[1].
Maybe even hiding old entries in history.
It is not one of
On 05/10/19 20:34, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
5 Oct 2019, 01:44 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
The problem here is that some raise the "not map the interior
private roads in detail" as not mapping them at all
Are they not mapping them or also
(incorrectly) deleting what others
mapped?
I
5 Oct 2019, 01:44 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
> The problem here is that some raise the "not map the interiorprivate roads in
> detail" as not mapping them at all
>
Are they not mapping them or also
(incorrectly) deleting what others
mapped?___
On 4/10/19 10:53 pm, Andy Townsend wrote:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1698#issuecomment-134914770
Thanks for that. I hadn't realised there was yet another prioblem with
using the path tag: highway=path bicycle=designated is currently
rendered differently to
On 4/10/19 10:53 pm, Andy Townsend wrote:
In places like Germany, however, dedicated infrastructure is more
common, and there are usually signs telling you exactly what you are
allowed to do. As I understand it (and this was before my time, so this
is largely hearsay) "cycleway" and
Even I'm not from AU, I would recommend adding private roads, especially
because we had a flood situation couple of years ago. In that time we were
mapping buildings (for rescue teams) and all kind of trails or roads just
to help people to escape flooded area. We didn't pay attention if it is
On 05/10/19 10:03, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au wrote:
# Principle of tagging
1. Tagging should be consistent with the laws of the jurisdiction
2. Tagging should not be code but be explicit
3. Tagging should be useful
4. Tagging should be intuitive
5. Tagging should be easy (regional presets)
I
5 Oct 2019, 02:43 by mapp...@consebt.de:
> Thinking of a delivery vehicle I am even considering if access=permissive
> would be appropriate.
>
access=permissive is used in cases where everyone
may enter, but owner may revoke access at any time
___
Maybe add the tag norender=yes when the owner or responsible body
requests that a feature not be rendered. This might apply to private
property, illegal tracks on public land , military bases and more. It
would be up to individual map renderers whether they would respect the
norender
15 matches
Mail list logo
