Re: [talk-au] Tagging fire stations

2022-10-09 Thread Phil Wyatt
Hi Folks, Well I am not too sure that the correct tagging of buildings is applied at all in Australia as I can only see about 200 uses of building:use=* in all of Oz! Seems most folks use the building tag to denote current use rather than initial construction intention. I am sure there are

Re: [talk-au] Tagging fire stations

2022-10-09 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 09:27, Mark Rattigan wrote: > > There are also plenty of minor RFS brigades which operate out of buildings > that weren't originally built to be fire stations. > But how then do we tag all of those where the firies operate out of a tin shed? Is it a

Re: [talk-au] Next tagging clean up project

2022-10-09 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 19:14, Phil Wyatt wrote: > > > Should it always be the case that the ‘plot’ on which the fire station > building resides is the ‘amenity’ and the ‘building’ should be separate > within the plot? To me, its not 100% clear in the wiki’s. > That was the way I thought it was

Re: [talk-au] Tagging fire stations

2022-10-09 Thread Mark Rattigan
Hi Phil I suspect that 'cleaning-up' these tags would require local knowledge for each location, and is certainly not as clean-cut as making sure that either one or the other is used. There are cases when only the building tag should be used, and some when only the amenity tag should be used.

Re: [talk-au] Cycle permissions by a user

2022-10-09 Thread Phil Wyatt
Hi Folks, Its also worth looking at planning documents that highlight the “shared trails” and ‘key pedestrian circulation” areas as well as ‘On Road cycle lanes” https://vpa-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Botanic-Ridge-Precinct-Structure-Plan-updated-May-2017.pdf

Re: [talk-au] Cycle permissions by a user

2022-10-09 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 21:21, Sebastian Azagra via Talk-au < talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > This was had no visible sign to indicate it was a shared way but it is > tagged as a shared way in OSM. > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903736648#map=17/-38.15145/145.29173 > With no street image

Re: [talk-au] Cycle permissions by a user

2022-10-09 Thread Phil Wyatt
Hi Sebastian, In the case you have highlighted, it looks to me that through that subdivision there is a wide path in some areas and a narrow path in others (Maxaar Imagery). That would seem to denote to me that the wider one is a shared path/cycleway. That also seems to match with the

Re: [talk-au] Cycle permissions by a user

2022-10-09 Thread forster
Hi Sebastian I want to draw you attention to an example I can across today. This was had no visible sign to indicate it was a shared way but it is tagged as a shared way in OSM. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903736648#map=17/-38.15145/145.29173 Can I get peoples opinion when it is

Re: [talk-au] Cycle permissions by a user

2022-10-09 Thread Sebastian Azagra via Talk-au
Dian, The permissive tag can be a bit misleading as it assume that permissions is allowed until such time that it is revoked. The reality is that the State Government or local council arent going to go and specifically revoke access to a user. Whatever happened to mapping what’s on the

[talk-au] Next tagging clean up project

2022-10-09 Thread Phil Wyatt
Hi Folks, I am looking for my next tagging clean-up project and wondered about amenity and building tags for fire stations amenity=fire_station - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mAq building=fire_station -