Gday Ross -
Good news is there are mappers out there who'd love the challenge of
fixing this intersection up, so instead of letting this bring you
down, I think a better idea is to report this on openstreetbugs. The
Melbourne region is 'clean' of bugs which to me indicates either
nobody
Interesting attitude by some people when your just trying to help.
Cheers
Ross
Original Message
Subject: [OpenStreetMap] Re: Roundabouts
From:** m-154722-c98...@messages.openstreetmap.org
Date:Fri, December 31, 2010 4:42 pm
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:11 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can't remember which side you fell on, but wouldn't this fall into
the same category as private pools? or private tennis courts... etc?
Yeah, though I think the case might be stronger for airstrips. One
reason
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275lon=151.13694zoom=17layers=M
Along the edge of the bay/water there is
land-- | --trees in water-- | -- water
A B C
In the changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6723657
I moved the edge of the
Are you sure this is the right changeset.
It only shows one deleted node and one new node.
Cheer
Ross
On 5 December 2010 17:43, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that this
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6545161 should be
reverted on the grounds that my
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:21:02 +1000 (EST)
i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Nick, My worry with the Old map + yahoo combo is that some armchair
mappers may over-ride existing surveyed data (I've already seen
surveyed stuff over-ridden by someone looking at yahoo a few times)
maybe even as far as
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
This is really simple.
If the source=survey don't change it unless you have resurveyed it.
Under no circumstances change source=survey data with traced data.
It is simple, but there are mappers who have done so.
Then if someone has not marked
I have since been tagging very extensively with source. I only trace stuff
like rivers, canals and railways that I am not going to be travelling
down.
Like wise.
Maybe there needs to be some thought put into the osm side of things about
survey being a required tag.
ie the editors (josm etc)
And if someone enjoys tracing roads or some other feature exclusively
are we to tell them to go away because it's not our idea of the best
way to spend their time on OSM?
Missed the point of my suggestion totally didn't you. I am not saying
don't do it just that if you want to improve the
9 matches
Mail list logo
