On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Daniel O'Connor daniel.ocon...@gmail.comwrote:
I started out with buildings, but got a bit excited in my local area;
getting down into trees, power lines, fences, driveways etc.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-34.84928/138.52277
Not super pretty
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:41:29 +1100
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Daniel O'Connor
daniel.ocon...@gmail.comwrote:
I started out with buildings, but got a bit excited in my local area;
getting down into trees, power lines, fences, driveways etc.
On 07/12/13 17:34, Will Rouesnel wrote:
Ok this is what I got from a brief walk around the neighborhood with
OSMPad on my phone:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2569340857#map=17/-33.82359/151.25009layers=ND
The addresses line up to the post-box / domestic entrances where
possible - my
On 07/12/13 17:34, Will Rouesnel wrote:
Ok this is what I got from a brief walk around the neighborhood with
OSMPad on my phone:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2569340857#map=17/-33.82359/151.25009layers=ND
Looks pretty good.
I'd add
addr:suburb=Balmoral or where ever
I also always add:
I suspected I was ignoring a really obvious tag. Guess I'll see how far
my feet can take me for a while - thanks for the advice all.
On Sat 07 Dec 2013 20:15:55 EST, Ross Scanlon wrote:
On 07/12/13 17:34, Will Rouesnel wrote:
Ok this is what I got from a brief walk around the neighborhood with
I'm still a little confused about the separate node model (which
seems to make more sense to me, in so far as it resolves better for
dealing with some large areas like farms).
But where should the node go? Referring to here
But where should the node go? Referring to here
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_feature/associatedAddress
it seems like the address node should be inside an area assocated
with
the object it assigns an address to, but in the case of parcels of
land/buildings this wouldn't be the
Ok this is what I got from a brief walk around the neighborhood with
OSMPad on my phone:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2569340857#map=17/-33.82359/151.25009layers=ND
The addresses line up to the post-box / domestic entrances where
possible - my motivation here is to get places I travel to
A simple example starting with my own house - how should residential
buildings be tagged?
The block they sit on is more of a land use concern, but the specific
buildings don't occupy the entire block - and seem like they should be
tagged house.
Is this a correct way to go about things? The goal
From: Will Rouesnel [mailto:w.roues...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:34 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] Adding residential properties?
A simple example starting with my own house - how should residential
buildings be tagged?
The block they sit
@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] Adding residential properties?
A simple example starting with my own house - how should residential
buildings be tagged?
The block they sit on is more of a land use concern, but the specific
buildings don't occupy the entire block - and seem like they should
I'd suggest you read these wiki pages:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Address
My personal opinion is that the address should be on a separate node at
the entrance to the property. This is preferred for disability access
programs.
It also
Hi Will,
I’ve been mapping the building outlines and tagging the feature appropriately,
e.g. house and then adding address data to each building. I’ve also added in a
smaller area the boundary fences or walls. There is I understand, two competing
models for recording addresses, one where the
13 matches
Mail list logo
