The version1 level 10 ABS boundaries have now been removed.
Now when you see a red way you know that it does indeed need
work on it.
If you use a mapnik rendering (whether Bing maps or
openstretmap.org) the remaining level 10 boundaries show up
well in purple.
These will almost always be of two
Thanks for doing that.
- Ben.
--
Ben Kelley
ben.kel...@gmail.com
On Feb 9, 2012 9:13 PM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
The version1 level 10 ABS boundaries have now been removed.
Now when you see a red way you know that it does indeed need
work on it.
If you use a mapnik
On 2/02/2012 9:41 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
Does anyone know if there are old (August 2008) Australian
OSM extracts available otherwise I'll start the planet download
(only 5 gig !!!)
I might have them - I've got nearly nightly Australia NZ dumps tucked
away somewhere - whether they go back as
Mark wrote
Mark wrote
I haven't looked at all the state borders yet, but some of them at
least are based on ABS data - prior to the ABS import, was there other
data for state borders that can be undeleted, or will we need to add
these in again?
Yes - it's still a very good question.
Once I've
On 02/02/2012, at 9:41 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
Does anyone know if there are old (August 2008) Australian
OSM extracts available otherwise I'll start the planet download
(only 5 gig !!!)
I don't have an OSM extracts, but there might be another way: undeleting the
old ways.
At
Mark wrote
I don't have an OSM extracts, but there might be another way: undeleting
the old ways.
Thanks Mark,
There is one more consideration which applies to state boundaries and
coastlines.
Some CT-agreers have put in a lot of hard work actually surveying and
improving these borders after
On 01/02/2012, at 9:09 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
So, should we clear out the doomed relations now or leave the
broken ones for the DWG to remove for us in April?
I think leave in the broken ones for now. I've started work on removing the
version 1 ways, but if someone with a faster internet
I'll scream about tomorrow lunchtime.
Can you explain why the DWG need to be involved here?
I'm not sure I see the benefits of a bulk remove prior to everything else.
I have had no difficulties in removing the ABS boundaries when they get it
my way.
Ian.
On Feb 1, 2012 11:50 PM, Nick Hocking
I think doing a JOSM search for user:ABS2006 does everything we want here.
Because JOSM is only aware of the most recent user, this selects all V1
ABS2006 imported objects only. Relations, nodes and ways. These can then
be deleted with a single click.
If the relations, ways, and nodes are all
Quoting Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com:
I think doing a JOSM search for user:ABS2006 does everything we want here.
Because JOSM is only aware of the most recent user, this selects all V1
ABS2006 imported objects only. Relations, nodes and ways. These can then
be deleted with a single
Mark wrote
I haven't looked at all the state borders yet, but some of them at
least are based on ABS data - prior to the ABS import, was there other
data for state borders that can be undeleted, or will we need to add
these in again?
That's a very good question.
The coastline in particular has
Okay, It sounds like your way further down this line of
thought/implementation than me.
I'm happy to drop any objection, and keep my fingers crossed for a good
result.
Looking forward to any data you can produce from your analysis.
Thanks,
Ian.
On 2 February 2012 10:46, Nick Hocking
On 2 February 2012 11:22, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest we get back our old state natrional boundaries
from before ABS and then improve them over the next year
or so, at our leisure.
There is nothing stopping us using the 2011 ABS boundaries, from the areas
where we
+1
Nick, you've obviously put a lot of thought into this and I trust your
judgement.
I think removing the boundaries sooner rather than later will make the
remapping effort easier, and spreading the pain across a few blows now is
better than waiting for a knockout hit on April 1st.
Cheers,
14 matches
Mail list logo
