On 20 June 2011 14:49, Mark Pulley wrote:
> Maybe Richard should have asked him privately first - I was mainly
> responding to John's attitude that it didn't matter.
Well, what does it matter now that they're going to start deleting non-CT data?
> Obviously there had to be some sort of source -
Quoting David Murn :
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 09:29 +1000, Mark Pulley wrote:
Quoting John Smith :
> On 20 June 2011 02:11, Richard Weait wrote:
>> Please clarify for us the sources of these edits?
> What does it matter since I'm never going to agree to the CT...
Now you're being rude.
Actually
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 09:29 +1000, Mark Pulley wrote:
> Quoting John Smith :
> > On 20 June 2011 02:11, Richard Weait wrote:
> >> Please clarify for us the sources of these edits?
> > What does it matter since I'm never going to agree to the CT...
>
> Now you're being rude.
Actually, I would sug
Quoting John Smith :
On 20 June 2011 02:11, Richard Weait wrote:
Please clarify for us the sources of these edits?
What does it matter since I'm never going to agree to the CT...
Now you're being rude.
It does matter - if you don't put a comment (and I happen to think
that your usual "fix
What does it matter since I'm never going to agree to the CT...
On 20 June 2011 02:11, Richard Weait wrote:
> "JohnSmith" your four changesets today are missing descriptive
> changeset comments.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JohnSmith/edits
>
> The barrier here http://www.openstreetmap.or
"JohnSmith" your four changesets today are missing descriptive
changeset comments.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JohnSmith/edits
The barrier here http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8480159
does not advise of the source you used. The connected way claims
yahoo as source, but that s
6 matches
Mail list logo
